Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 15 Oct 2009 (Thursday) 09:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best Lens for Full Body Portraits or Fashion?

 
Slitherbeth
Junior Member
Avatar
28 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: St Marys, Kansas
     
Oct 15, 2009 09:29 |  #1

I have been doing portraits with my 85mm 1.8 on a 50D, but I would like a lens that is better for full body poses. The catch is that my budget it around $500...any suggestions?

Thanks! :D


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
xdmg
Senior Member
538 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Oct 15, 2009 09:31 |  #2

Try to get a nice copy (no focus issues) of the Sigma 30 f/1.4... around $350-400$ used

or maybe a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8


http://rohofoto.com (external link) | facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,945 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2253
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 15, 2009 10:17 |  #3

What format...135/FF or APS-C? What distance to the subject? Set shots? runway?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,567 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 15, 2009 10:25 |  #4

I am assuming you don't have room to back way up with your 85?

Anyway, I agree on the Sigma 30 1.4 or also look at the Canon 28 1.8. (assuming aps-c camera)

If you are in the studio with strobes and don't have to worry about blurring the BG to death, any decent wider zoom will do.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
Avatar
2,440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
     
Oct 15, 2009 13:23 |  #5

Sigma is very good for it's money!


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Oct 15, 2009 14:36 |  #6

There is no "best" lens for any sort of portraiture. It depends on how far away you are and what look you want.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,251 posts
Likes: 81
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:08 |  #7

I'm also assuming this is for use with one of the crop sensor cameras... (Rebel, 40/50D, etc.)

Canon 28/1.8, Sigma 30/1.4... However, both can impart some wide angle distortion if not careful. Keep people away from the edges of the frame and don't get in too close with them (makes for oversized noses and undersized ears!).

If you have adequate room to work get a 50/1.4, either the Canon or the Sigma. This focal length will render very natural perspective and little distortion. I saw comparative examples from each of these on some website the other day after a Google search... I have been using the Canon for years and had heard a lot about the Sigma, thought I might want to try it. Frankly, after seeing the sample images, I think I'll just stick with the less expensive Canon. I didn't see enough difference in head to head comparisons to make it worth the extra. The Sigma is better built, but the Canon isn't bad.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - ZENFOLIO (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 15, 2009 16:11 |  #8
bannedBack in 2 months

I do most of mine around 50mm, but I've used 24mm and 135mm as well just about every focal length my lenses cover. "Best" is subjective and therefore has no single, definitive answer.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Slitherbeth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
28 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: St Marys, Kansas
     
Oct 16, 2009 08:44 |  #9

Thanks so much everyone, I think I'll go with the 28 1/8 :)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,475 posts
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 16, 2009 09:37 |  #10

Slitherbeth wrote in post #8833420 (external link)
Thanks so much everyone, I think I'll go with the 28 1/8 :)

WAIT. Don't be in a rush to buy glass if you don't know how it will work out for you.

I suspect you may find yourself getting a bit too close to the subject (for a proper perspective) with that focal length on an APS-C format camera.

Do you have any answers to the various questions above about intended camera-to-subject distances, etc?

Do you have a zoom lens that would cover the 28 through 50 or 60mm range? If so, test your ideas with that before buying another lens. Pay attention to the perspective in the test images. You may very well find that you need to change your distance and thus the focal length. After choosing the proper distance to get the desired perspective, THEN you should be choosing a focal length to get the desired framing.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,475 posts
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 16, 2009 09:39 |  #11

amfoto1 wrote in post #8829173 (external link)
Canon 28/1.8, Sigma 30/1.4... However, both can impart some wide angle distortion if not careful. Keep people away from the edges of the frame and don't get in too close with them (makes for oversized noses and undersized ears!).

If you have adequate room to work get a 50/1.4, either the Canon or the Sigma. This focal length will render very natural perspective and little distortion. I saw comparative examples from each of these on some website the other day after a Google search... I have been using the Canon for years and had heard a lot about the Sigma, thought I might want to try it. Frankly, after seeing the sample images, I think I'll just stick with the less expensive Canon. I didn't see enough difference in head to head comparisons to make it worth the extra. The Sigma is better built, but the Canon isn't bad.

Focal lengths, in themselves, do not create perspective distortion. It's the camera-to-subject distance, and nothing else, that causes that. Please read our "sticky" tutorial titled Perspective Control in Images - Focal Length or Distance?.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,945 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2253
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 16, 2009 10:04 |  #12

There never was a reply about format, only presumptions about APS-C. So let me answer in that context and hope the OP has that camera format...

85mm is too long on APS-C for head and shoulders, forcing one to be positioned farther back than optimal to permit easy and quick adjustment to poses and lighitng...back and forth and back and forth.

Conversely, 28mm is a bit wide for full length, although it can work without problem. A 'normal' FL is usual for full length work, at 10' shooting distance it sees 7' x 4.7''

I would not worry about induced perspective distortion with 28mm, as I have found that one can work without much fear of that with a lens as wide as 74 degree angle of view (18mm on APS-C)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Slitherbeth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
28 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: St Marys, Kansas
     
Oct 16, 2009 11:53 |  #13

well I have a crop body, so wouldn't 28mm be about "normal" . and I'd probably be about 10 feet away


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,475 posts
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 16, 2009 12:01 |  #14

Slitherbeth wrote in post #8834575 (external link)
well I have a crop body, so wouldn't 28mm be about "normal" . and I'd probably be about 10 feet away

Yes, a 28mm lens is approximately a "normal" lens on that format camera. However, it may not be appropriate for framing the portraits that you intend to make at the distance you choose to use.

The 10-foot camera-to-subject distance would probably be OK. Make sure you have at least six feet between the subject(s) and the backdrop if you're using a typical studio backdrop.

What lens(es) do you currently have that you could experiment with? If you could set a "kit" lens to 28mm, for example, you could confirm whether or not that focal length would work well for your intended setup.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Slitherbeth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
28 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: St Marys, Kansas
     
Oct 16, 2009 12:45 |  #15

I only have he 85 1.8, so its kind of hard to tell with that


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,488 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Lens for Full Body Portraits or Fashion?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is lindascott
732 guests, 253 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.