Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 Oct 2009 (Saturday) 21:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

found a sharpening action for photoshop

 
Grady69
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 483
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 17, 2009 21:03 |  #1

Found this sharpening action for photoshop on Deviantart.com called Mansyk SRS Here is 2 pics i tried with it, please tell me what you think, Please?


Canon 5D MK III Gripped
Canon 7D Gripped
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art
Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Oct 17, 2009 21:44 |  #2

It's completely pointless without having the originals for side-by-side comparison.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grady69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 483
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 17, 2009 22:53 |  #3

Sorry i shouldve known that ill get the originals posted soon


Canon 5D MK III Gripped
Canon 7D Gripped
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art
Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Oct 17, 2009 23:00 |  #4

Well, they don't look not sharp, so I guess it works. At this resolution, I don't see any sharpening artifacts, so I guess it works well enough for this resolution.

Rad

EDIT:

By the way, both shots are apealing. Only small nits. The little leaf in the forground on the cat shot should go - (cute kitty) and the blue areas on the Joy shot should be toned down.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grady69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 483
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 17, 2009 23:05 |  #5

Ok here is the originals they were just converted to jpeg and resized to post no PP at all. Hope this helps this time.


Canon 5D MK III Gripped
Canon 7D Gripped
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art
Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reverend
Senior Member
Avatar
257 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
     
Oct 19, 2009 10:01 |  #6

Just looks like a pretty standard unsharp mask to me.


www.alsphoto.com (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dkorr
Member
65 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Sun Diego
     
Oct 19, 2009 13:41 as a reply to  @ Reverend's post |  #7

might be better to sharpen in RAW




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Oct 19, 2009 14:35 |  #8

Tnx for posting the originals!

The sharpened images do have what I would call an enhanced local contrast. There is a difference between that and "sharpness", but don't ask me to explain it, because I haven't researched that issue in detail. The only explanation that I can offer is that I expect "sharpening" to manifest itself primarily in the boundaries between scene elements, whereas enhanced contrast manifests itself across all areas of a scene, regardless of whether it's a boundary between scene elements or not.

I realize that may still sound a little fuzzy (unsharp), but that is the best I can do at the moment.

Another question might be, does it make the sharpened image noticeably better to the casual observer? I would have to say "no".

Now, how can we explain such a disappointing result?

I think you have to take into account that we are still not looking at the renditions that we must use in order to evaluate the sharpening process. The sharpening was applied either before or after the downsizing. I have no way to know which way it was done (and I should have thought of that before asking you to post the un-sharpened versions.

If the sharpening is applied to the downsized images, it is of little to no value, because it has to be applied to the native JPG image as it came from the camera. (I am assuming these were not RAW images). If you make actual prints at large magnifications, such as 8" x 10", or better yet , 16" x 20", that is where you might see a more significant difference. So long as we are looking at these 0.7 MP images, we are not going to see as much difference as we would at higher resolutions, such as at the native resolution of the JPG file coming from the camera (6.3 MP).

Sory to nickel and dime you like this, but as usual, simple questions do not have simple answers.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grady69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 483
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 19, 2009 15:02 |  #9

Well I did the shapening action in raw then converted to jpeg. But anyway it doesnt always want to work when you start up CS4, even if i reset actions and reload it, so it has issues. So I just went back to using Lonestardigital.com's Texas-Two step action it seems to do what I need just fine. Im sure there is better
out there, I just havent been out there to try other actions. Thanks for the responses, they were greatly appreciated
Grady69


Canon 5D MK III Gripped
Canon 7D Gripped
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art
Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,003 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
found a sharpening action for photoshop
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is droneworx
749 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.