Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Oct 2009 (Tuesday) 16:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The best bang-for-the-buck manual focus lenses

 
rajendra
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Oct 20, 2009 16:19 |  #1

After gaining a lot of new insights on non-Canon lenses (Zeiss, Leica etc.) in another thread (thanks for that!), I was wondering what the best bang for the buck mf lenses are.

It doesn't have to be EF-mount as long as it can be used with an adapter. I heard the Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 is supposed to be good value (I already have the 85L however)... So what other lenses are recommended? The new 21mm distagon maybe?

It doesn't have to be within a certain budget, just looking for the best value lenses :D

Thanks for the input everyone!


5D Mark II | 35L f/1.4 | 85L f/1.2 II | 135L f/2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 20, 2009 16:24 |  #2

The best bang-for-the-buck manual-focus-only lenses that I have are the four "primes" that I bought for my two Nikon F cameras back in 1967.

The price? I forget what they cost :rolleyes:.

Seriously, I doubt that 40-year-old Nikon lenses are going to break anyone's bank, but they were/are superb lenses. I have used the heck out of mine in all sorts of situations including following Formula 1 racing and U.S. drag racing - all with press passes, of course.

None has ever needed any repair. The glass is pristine in all of them, though the external finish shows the use they have been through. That's probably what you'll find if you find used lenses in stores.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JReady
Member
Avatar
229 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 20, 2009 17:06 |  #3

I'd be interested in answers to this question as well. Nice topic!


Gear :: Flickr (external link) :: Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Oct 20, 2009 17:52 as a reply to  @ JReady's post |  #4

Most Olympus OM primes are still a good value, and are excellent performers on a Canon EOS body with an inexpensive adapter. The 18/3.5, 21/3.5, and 24/2.8 are well worth using. Ditto for the 35/3.5 PC shift lens. The 18 is getting tough to find, but they are available (but usually at a premium). Great lens, with little distortion. The longer teles, 200 and 300, are also others to consider (and very inexpensive)...you can get a 200 prime, with adapter, for under $100.

Most C/Y Zeiss primes are also excellent performers and are moderately priced. I use the 28/2.8 and 35/2.8. There's also the C/Y Zeiss 35-70/3.4 zoom...just about as sharp as any prime lens and also very moderately priced. Then there's the legendary Zeiss 21/2.8, but I'm passing on that one.

I'd say the easiest lenses to adapt, with pretty much zero possibility of any interference with the camera's mirror (5D and 5D2) would be the Olympus OM lenses. Very small, very discreet, and basically the same filter size across most, if not all, of the entire range. If you do any hiking, these lenses are so small and light that you could carry a full complement of them and not even notice them. This is why I have so many OM lenses in my gear list.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lonelyjew
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2008
     
Oct 20, 2009 18:13 |  #5

super takumar 50mm f1.4


Canon 40D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS, ∑ 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro, ∑ 105mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro
580ex II
An off brand tank of a tripod w/ Manfrotto 486RC2 Head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Oct 20, 2009 20:42 |  #6

see my sig...all but the 200 and 85 nikkors (bought new 25+ yrs ago for $125-150) were bought in the past 1.5 years....and all were <$75


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 20, 2009 22:16 |  #7

Helios 44-2 or 44-3. 58/2 M42 mount, should be less than $50. w/ S&H from Russia.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdenney
Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney
2,400 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
     
Oct 20, 2009 23:06 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #8

Of the ones I have now:

Tamron SP 90mm/2.5 Macro. Get it with an M42 or Nikon Adaptall mount and adapt it, or get a knockoff chipped EF Adaptall (which is what I did).

Evidence:

IMAGE: http://www.rickdenney.com/images/IMG_5189_emerging_tulip_lores.jpg

There may be better lenses, but not for the money. For example, I have a vintage Nikkor 180/2.8 ED which is truly world-class, but they run several hundred bucks. Worth it, of course, but not really a bang-for-the-buck contender. Now, I paid $55 for an even-more-classic Nikkor 105/2.5, but that falls into the category of manna from Heaven, and the Tamron can be found for what I paid for it (under $100) pretty routinely.

Rick "thinking the bokeh of the Tamron isn't any worse than that Helios 44" Denney

The List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 20, 2009 23:42 |  #9

There are so many bang for buck lenses actually. Least amount I have paid for a lens that I really use, $6. Please don't ask about the most I have paid.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Oct 20, 2009 23:52 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #10

As Skip mentioned AI-S Nikkors from the '70s to the late '80s..Built to last and sharp as a pin..Also easy to adapt to EOS DSLR bodies..

Here are a couple of beauties.. Nikkor AI-S 85mm f/2 (my favourite and probably the sharpest lens I've owned) , 50mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 (not the E Series), 105mm f/2.5, 135mm f/2.8, 180mm f/2.8 ED.. Another lens worth a look is the Tamron SP 135mm f/2.8..

I've got an AI-S 300mm f/2.8 IF ED which is on long term loan to my niece who still shoots film..I'm dying to adapt this lens..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Oct 20, 2009 23:55 |  #11

Tamron SP 90mm/2.5 Macro

This lens has been around since Noah was a boy..It used to be the choice for macro shooters..

The new version, the SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di Macro is a brilliant lens and quite inexpensive..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rajendra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Oct 21, 2009 03:05 |  #12

Thanks for all the replies everyone! I had no idea for example that Olympus made such high regarded lenses... I'll definitely check out all the suggestions.

Where do you usually find these lenses? Online or in your local shop?


5D Mark II | 35L f/1.4 | 85L f/1.2 II | 135L f/2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotch
Goldmember
1,516 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 21, 2009 03:24 |  #13

eBay, where I've found most.
The Contax/Yashica Zeiss stuff is superb. 50/1.7(1.4 too), 85/1.4, 85/2.8...it goes on... and the two zooms :

35-70 and 28-85, both are absolutely stellar. I've the latter, and most go for the 35-70 due to the easier handling...the other, believe me, is a brick.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LAD
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Oct 21, 2009 06:35 |  #14

Check the Sell section, I have a few Olympus for sale. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rajendra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Oct 21, 2009 13:58 |  #15

Lad :)

Anyone else have more input on this?

Thanks everyone!


5D Mark II | 35L f/1.4 | 85L f/1.2 II | 135L f/2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,989 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
The best bang-for-the-buck manual focus lenses
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1799 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.