Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Dec 2009 (Tuesday) 15:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 7D and gaps between exposures

 
firstclass
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Dec 22, 2009 22:34 as a reply to  @ post 9248681 |  #16

Perhaps I don't understand the mechanism, but in continuous mode, isn't the image written to the buffer then to the card? And can't the buffer hold something like half a dozen+ RAW shots at maximum FPS before it starts delaying due to card writes? So why would this have to do with writing to the card?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Dec 23, 2009 02:51 |  #17

amfoto1 wrote in post #9247430 (external link)
First.... There is no need to use mirror lockup on a 30 second long (or longer) exposure. The duration of "mirror slap" is so short, that it's an insignificant part of an exposure that long.....

On any normal long exposure then I'd agree. For star shots though, the point intensity of some stars can be high enough to show some blurr...certainly noticeable using a 600mm lens.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raikyn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,155 posts
Likes: 1123
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawkes Bay , NZ
     
Dec 23, 2009 03:27 |  #18

Maybe it is a problem with the remote+7D?
I've just tried holding down the shutter on a 30sec shot on continuous, and although there was a slight delay the second shot started almost immediately.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosbyKev
THREAD ­ STARTER
Wildlife Photographer of the year 2006
Avatar
157 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Gloucester Uk
     
Dec 23, 2009 04:58 |  #19

all good food for thought thank you. I'll run some more tests today and see what I can find out.

Specifically:
the delay between frames on shorter exposures, this thread, on another forum (external link) showed that the delay reduces as the length of exposure reduces

Holding the shutter button down on my 5D I see the 2.5 s recycling delay with a 30 s shutter speed (2:10 / 4 frames). The delay drops to 1.9 s at T = 15 s (2:15 / 8 frames), 0.75 s at T = 5 s (2:18 / 24 frames), and finally 0.32 s at T = 1 s (16 s / 12 frames). The output image was the same in every frame since I left the lens cap on, and the output file size did not change.

I need to check the effect of the Canon remote against using the shutter and also do a check with single frame shooting mode


regards

Kev Lewis.
My website of wildlife and nature photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raikyn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,155 posts
Likes: 1123
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawkes Bay , NZ
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:11 |  #20

Since you are wildlife photog you don't have the silent shutter mode enabled?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:12 |  #21

2.6 s for the sensor to cool after running for 30s?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosbyKev
THREAD ­ STARTER
Wildlife Photographer of the year 2006
Avatar
157 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Gloucester Uk
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:14 |  #22

Raikyn wrote in post #9250030 (external link)
Since you are wildlife photog you don't have the silent shutter mode enabled?

It isn't something I've played so it's set at default at the moment. Worth taking a look at it and see if it has an effect


regards

Kev Lewis.
My website of wildlife and nature photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raikyn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,155 posts
Likes: 1123
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawkes Bay , NZ
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:22 |  #23

PhotosbyKev wrote in post #9250038 (external link)
It isn't something I've played so it's set at default at the moment. Worth taking a look at it and see if it has an effect

It's just that on the second day after getting my 7D I turned off every noise/quiet reduction feature I could find.
Obviously in this situation the long exp/high iso noise settings would have a far greater impact.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:38 |  #24

Even if you don't get to the bottom of what is causing the 2.6 sec delay, I am surprised it is giving you gaps in your star trails. I only say that because the stars will move so little in 2.6 secs that I am surprised it is noticeable when you stack your images. It will be more obvious if you are using a long lens, but as your exif is not intact, it's not possible to tell if that is a contributing factor.

The only other thing I can suggest to check is that you don't have an interval set in your remote. I've done that before without realising.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 23, 2009 05:47 |  #25

Well, I can tell you that this doesn't happen when I do these sorts of exposures. I set my 7D for 20 or 30 seconds, burst mode. Then just use a cheapo Ebay shutter release and lock it into the 'hold' position. Delay between shots is something like 0.26s

It's nothing to do with the amount of data (which is exactly the same for a 30s exposure as it is for a 1/3000s exposure). It's not Long-Exposure NR as that would add an interval of 30s between shots. It can't be any of the other processing things as you'd see the same delay in ordinary shooting.

It's got to be the remote. So try it just pressing and holding the shutter - I'll bet that gets rid of the delay. If it does then I'd try one of the cheaper, non-timer, remotes and see how that goes.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Dec 23, 2009 07:32 |  #26

I just did this test as well using the shutter button on the camera and held it down continuously. It had something less than a second delay to reopen the shutter for the next 30 sec exposure, so I agree with hollis, it has to be your remote.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosbyKev
THREAD ­ STARTER
Wildlife Photographer of the year 2006
Avatar
157 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Gloucester Uk
     
Dec 23, 2009 09:21 |  #27

Sorarse wrote in post #9250093 (external link)
Even if you don't get to the bottom of what is causing the 2.6 sec delay, I am surprised it is giving you gaps in your star trails. I only say that because the stars will move so little in 2.6 secs that I am surprised it is noticeable when you stack your images. It will be more obvious if you are using a long lens, but as your exif is not intact, it's not possible to tell if that is a contributing factor.

The only other thing I can suggest to check is that you don't have an interval set in your remote. I've done that before without realising.

I was using the Canon 10-22mm lens at the 10mm end. I do use the fancy Canon remote release but just use it to lock the shutter button down and use the camera shutter speed set to 30 seconds.


regards

Kev Lewis.
My website of wildlife and nature photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeutronBoy
Goldmember
2,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: LI, NY
     
Dec 23, 2009 09:29 |  #28

callaesthetics wrote in post #9247322 (external link)
30 seconds is a lot of data, that 2.6 seconds is probably the camera processing the image before it can recreate a new one.

My XTi takes 20-30 secs to process a 30 secs exposure.

It's the same amount of data as any other picture file. The camera is capturing the light photons over a longer period of time is all ... same file size at end of exposure.

Write time?


Sony A7C, Sony A6000, 5D Mark II, 40D, 350d
Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II L | Canon 100-400 IS L [COLOR=black]| Canon 24-70 L | Canon 100mm Macro f2.8 | Canon 50 f1.4| Canon 10-22 | Canon MP-E 65 | Rokinon 14mm f2.8 | Sigma 17 - 70 macro
MT-24 & 430 flashes | other junk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Dec 23, 2009 10:06 |  #29

callaesthetics wrote in post #9247322 (external link)
My XTi takes 20-30 secs to process a 30 secs exposure.

That's almost certainly because you've got Long-Exposure Noise Reduction switched on. After the 30 second exposure the camera takes another 30s exposure without opening the shutter. It then subtracts that one from the original.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosbyKev
THREAD ­ STARTER
Wildlife Photographer of the year 2006
Avatar
157 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Gloucester Uk
     
Dec 23, 2009 10:18 |  #30

hollis_f wrote in post #9250120 (external link)
Well, I can tell you that this doesn't happen when I do these sorts of exposures. I set my 7D for 20 or 30 seconds, burst mode. Then just use a cheapo Ebay shutter release and lock it into the 'hold' position. Delay between shots is something like 0.26s

It's nothing to do with the amount of data (which is exactly the same for a 30s exposure as it is for a 1/3000s exposure). It's not Long-Exposure NR as that would add an interval of 30s between shots. It can't be any of the other processing things as you'd see the same delay in ordinary shooting.

It's got to be the remote. So try it just pressing and holding the shutter - I'll bet that gets rid of the delay. If it does then I'd try one of the cheaper, non-timer, remotes and see how that goes.

and Teamspeed, it does sound like the mirror is dropping and lifting very quickly (which I would expect) but the delay is before this happens I think.

I'm not using any of the programmable modes of the remote all I do is lock the shutter release on it. This closes a mechanical switch in the remote which triggers the camera, no electronics are involved, it even works if the cr2032 battery dies in it so I tried it like that with no change to the delay problem.

I tried your test using only the shutter button but there wan't a change to the time delay. Please repeat your testing with the shutter button BUT set shutter speed to 30 seconds and then press and hold the button for 5 exposures I think you will see a total elapsed time of around 150 seconds PLUS another 13 seconds so approximately 163 seconds for the 5 exposures. This assumes all noise reduction is turned off.

Disabling the Silent Shooting mode did reduce the delay from 2.6 to 2.3 seconds per exposure

regards
Kev


regards

Kev Lewis.
My website of wildlife and nature photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,601 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
Canon 7D and gaps between exposures
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1769 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.