I know this has been asked before and I have searched the threads and most are pretty old so here is my question. I am looking to upgrade my 30D which I bought just to get my feet wet in digital I still do most of my shooting on an RZ67 and hand develop and print. I mostly shoot portraits and landscapes and am looking to move completely to digital and MF is out of the budget. So in the current landscape the 1dsmkII and the 1dmkIII are selling used for very close to the same price so my question, does the FF and higher MP negate the 14bit processing and newer sensor and other features such as sensor cleaning, micro adjust ect. I am not really interested in high iso in fact I am more excited that it will go down to 50. So I would really like to hear from those with experience with both is the extra 6.7 MP and full frame make the 1dsmkII the winner or do the newer features and processing give the edge to the MKIII. Also just FYI most of my printing will be 11x14 and 8x10.