Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 06 Mar 2010 (Saturday) 06:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Do I really need IS? Sorry for asking

 
blakephoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
57 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 06, 2010 15:27 |  #16

Wow.... ok, well I currently shoot with a 400D but will be upgrading to either a 5D mkII or a 550D soon. Weight isn't really a problem for me, but sharpness I am rather picky about.

That 800 bucks is not gonna do you much good when you're standing there in the field, with a once in a lifetime shot coming up out of the grass, and not a tripod, tree stump, or fence post in a mile to lean on, all for the lack of that little "switch."

Don't take this the wrong way, but what photog worth his salt would be outdoors with out a tripod or monopod, saying that I lost a monopod while shooting in long grass once.

Well thank you all for your helpful comments, I'm rather swayed towards the non IS not only because of the cost, but the image quality is sharper if only slightly.


Brad Blake Photography (external link)
Facebook page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
DavidR
Goldmember
1,542 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 55
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Titusville, Florida
     
Mar 06, 2010 16:28 |  #17

If your picky about image sharpness maybe a prime is in your future, I sold my 70-200 2.8 non IS for the 135L. Saying that, when I purchase another 70-200 it WILL have IS.


M10 - ZM21 - ZM35

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blakephoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
57 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 06, 2010 17:22 |  #18

DavidR wrote in post #9741899 (external link)
If your picky about image sharpness maybe a prime is in your future, I sold my 70-200 2.8 non IS for the 135L. Saying that, when I purchase another 70-200 it WILL have IS.

I had a look at the primes and I currently use a 50mm for most of my shots, but I really like being able to zoom in on the subject without having to swap the lens or end up standing a foot away from them.


Brad Blake Photography (external link)
Facebook page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,182 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2022
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 06, 2010 17:40 |  #19

Any time you need to hand hold ANY lens at 1/(FL*1.6) shutter speed on APS-C, IS can help. There are techniques that get you below that rule of thumb (like resting the camera against a rail or wall) but they still leave the camera subject to motion when you press the shutter button! And while it might look fine at 4x6", blow it up and you see the motion artifact. Short FL has nothing to do with NOT needing IS, the detail simply needs to be below a certain fraction of the frame size and the motion blur needs to be above a certain amount! To prove that point, here is a shot at 17mm on a hand held APS-C camera (all shots are section crops from full frame area)...
shutter speed, left to right: 1/25 (1/(FL*1.6), 1/12, 1/6, 1/3; top row no IS, bottom row with IS, when I had back pain just standing!

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/17mmIS.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jason ­ C
Goldmember
4,725 posts
Gallery: 308 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 975
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Calabasas, CA
     
Mar 06, 2010 17:54 |  #20

As was probably mentioned already, "IS" does not help freeze a moving or living subject, a higher shutter speed is needed for that.

"IS" does help eliminate your input in hand holding your camera during a capture. "IS" is still a very helpful and useful tool, especially in your longer FL shots. It can also make the difference in getting that shot, or just missing it because of your camera shake.

Jason C


Equipment & Feedback
"I am not interested in shooting new things-I am interested to see things new"--Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Mar 06, 2010 18:03 |  #21

It's seldom mentioned but many shots need an aperture smaller than wide-open. IS allows a photographer to shoot a smaller aperture than possible without it.


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pingflood
Member
247 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
Mar 06, 2010 19:39 |  #22

tkbslc wrote in post #9740536 (external link)
If you want to shoot at under 1/320 shutter speed without a tripod, then get IS. Otherwise, no benefit.

That's just poor advice. There's a huge difference between people when it comes to hand holding. I know some people who are shaky enough to need 1/250 or faster with a 50mm lens, and others that like myself can hand hold a 400mm prime at 1/160 well enough to get more than a few keepers. The "focal length times crop factor" is just a VERY rough ballpark figure, and much like the BMI should not be applied to individuals as some rule to determine what lens they should buy.

Not to mention, if the guy's shooting moving subjects, being able to hand hold at very slow speeds thanks to IS won't help any at all. Keep that in mind, too, before dissing out one liner advice.


1DsII, 7D, EF 85/1.8, EF 50/1.4, EF 24-105L, EF 100-400L, EF 400/5.6L, EF 500/4L, Samyang 14/2.8, Zeiss ZE 50/1.4 Planar

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,375 views & 0 likes for this thread
Do I really need IS? Sorry for asking
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is gunz46
790 guests, 255 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.