Rented it from lensrentals.com. Just got here. For my upcoming Florida trip. Anyway, it is huge and quite heavy.
I will look like a pro with a white lens and the large hood attached. Too bad my skills won't back up the impression.
That is all.
probe1957 Member ![]() 107 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Central IL More info | Mar 16, 2010 11:16 | #1 Rented it from lensrentals.com. Just got here. For my upcoming Florida trip. Anyway, it is huge and quite heavy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mule Member ![]() 130 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Massachusetts More info | Mar 16, 2010 11:32 | #2 I think I am going to rent the F4 for our trip to North Carolina in April. I have a feeling I will be in the same boat LOL. Canon 7D w/ 28-135 kit lens, 50mm 1.8, Canon 70-300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wcgryphon Member 122 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 11:51 | #3 mule wrote in post #9807628 ![]() I think I am going to rent the F4 for our trip to North Carolina in April. I have a feeling I will be in the same boat LOL. I was actually quite surprised at how compact and light the f4 version is when I got mine a few weeks ago (f4 IS version). Although, I do shoot with the 24-70L regularly, so my perception of "compact & light" might be quite different than yours.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lyndon Chen Member 191 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Denver, CO More info | Mar 16, 2010 12:01 | #4 The 4L is exactly half the weight of the 2.8L IS and a much less imposing looking lens. http://www.shiningmomentphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonK Goldmember ![]() 2,161 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2004 Location: PA USA More info | Mar 16, 2010 12:35 | #5 The F4 is waaaaay different than the 2.8 Having owned the F4 its long, but its not ridiculously "large" or heavy. 7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
XTshooter Member ![]() 168 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Mar 16, 2010 12:37 | #6 I have the 2.8 and it is a bit heavy. Although, carrying that lens around is about the only exercise I get these days, so I don't mind it. Shooting Fujis and Nikons at work, and Canons on my free time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dawnkyung Senior Member 951 posts Likes: 45 Joined Aug 2009 More info | 70-200 mk I bowled me over the first time I picked it up attached to my gripped 5D. Can't wait to slap it on my new (to me) 1DMark II....I need some exercise, maybe I'll jog around the block with it when I get home...lol. dawn | 29 | gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
snyderman Cream of the Crop ![]() 7,084 posts Likes: 9 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Wadsworth, Ohio More info | Mar 16, 2010 14:55 | #8 Yes, and yes. Heavy and you'll look like a pro! Enjoy the great images you'll certainly get with the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS. Great lens. It almost never leaves my camera body. Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jaytypes Senior Member ![]() 443 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Nyc More info | It is a great lense! you won't think about it when you start seeing the IQ it puts out. Canon 5D MKIII X2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vitacura Goldmember ![]() 1,514 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Tampa Bay, Fl More info | Mar 16, 2010 16:45 | #10 |
ChrisMc73 Goldmember ![]() 3,212 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Mar 16, 2010 16:53 | #11 I want one, I'm finnicky too about it being new vs. used...is that weird?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
theextremist04 Goldmember ![]() 1,224 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Kansas City More info | Mar 16, 2010 17:05 | #12 |
chomish Goldmember ![]() 1,917 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Mar 16, 2010 17:13 | #13 ChrisMc73 wrote in post #9809907 ![]() I want one, I'm finnicky too about it being new vs. used...is that weird? What are used ones going for vs. new? I too like buying everything new. I love being the first to open that lens package and use it. To me its worth the 10-15% ill save to buy new.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisMc73 Goldmember ![]() 3,212 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Mar 16, 2010 21:13 | #14 chomish wrote in post #9810022 ![]() I too like buying everything new. I love being the first to open that lens package and use it. To me its worth the 10-15% ill save to buy new. Thats an excellent lens btw. And if u dont need the 2.8 the f4 IS is even better. Sharperr and more contrasty give the images a much nicer pop to them. Im actually going for the F4 myself. I can't get an f4 over an f2.8 after having my 24-70, it would get mad at me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eyee12 Member ![]() 110 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Mar 17, 2010 16:00 | #15 hahaha. when would you guys rent instead of buying the lens? i always have the trouble of spending the money to rent when i could put that money towads the purchase =[ 5D Mark II | 35mm f/1.4 L | 85mm f/1.2 L | 135mm f/2.0 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1234 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |