Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Feb 2011 (Sunday) 16:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I want New GLASS and I want it bad

 
curlydog
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Florida
     
Feb 13, 2011 16:41 |  #1

So I have decided to spring for 70-200mm f2.8 for the upcoming dance season - just a Dad taking pictures of his daughter and her friends at regional competitions - I have a 50D and have used a Tamron 28-300mm VC the past two seasons however I really need more speed.
I also shoot volunteer work at the local regional theater every other month or so.

So after a great deal of research and reading numerous threads here I am down to the the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM or the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM - both fit the $1500.00 budget and the two obvious differences are Brand(Dooh) and IS/OS

I am leaning toward the Sigma, I really could use the 4 stops of stabilization, I know my hands are not the steadiest.

So I plan on pulling the trigger this Friday, so I hope I pick right :0) - and yes I wish I could justify the MarkII it would make the whole choice a lot easier.


Canon 50D / Canon 6D
-Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon 24-105mm L Sigma EF 500 DG Super Photoshop CC Tamron AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM Alien Bees 2-ab400 2-ab800 http://photos.curlydog​.com (external link) Just a Guy With a Camera Shooting His Daughter and Her Friends Dancing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.c.chavez
Member
Avatar
157 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: P-Town, OR
     
Feb 13, 2011 16:43 |  #2

if your panning, its not making much of a difference. atleast i think so... how about adding on a flash?


Filters are like Condoms ... Protection at loss of some quality.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Avatar
3,195 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 55
Joined Aug 2009
Location: South Texas
     
Feb 13, 2011 16:50 |  #3

Im sure you realize the IS or OS wont help with the kids in motion Dancing right ?

But it sure is nice when your taking still shots of the kids or any other static subject matter without the need of an external flash.

If your objectives will be solely moving subjects you could opt for a used 70-200 f2.8 non-IS and also pick-up a new 85 f1.8 for the lower light captures of the dancing activity which both should fit within your budget.

Regards whatever your decision. ;)


Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mk1Racer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,735 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Flagtown, NJ
     
Feb 13, 2011 17:46 |  #4

Or you could pick up a used 70-200 f/2.8 IS Mk I and a 85 f/1.8 from the classifieds here. Should be able to stay in or close to your budget.


7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
curlydog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Florida
     
Feb 13, 2011 18:12 |  #5

Silverfox1 wrote in post #11836296 (external link)
Im sure you realize the IS or OS wont help with the kids in motion Dancing right ?

But it sure is nice when your taking still shots of the kids or any other static subject matter without the need of an external flash.

If your objectives will be solely moving subjects you could opt for a used 70-200 f2.8 non-IS and also pick-up a new 85 f1.8 for the lower light captures of the dancing activity which both should fit within your budget.

Regards whatever your decision. ;)

Yes, I understand that :o) , the IS/OS would really be an advantage shooting theater is my thought

Mk1Racer I thought of that but used scares me to death when spending that kinda of money, probably irrational fear , but nonetheless fear.


Canon 50D / Canon 6D
-Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon 24-105mm L Sigma EF 500 DG Super Photoshop CC Tamron AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM Alien Bees 2-ab400 2-ab800 http://photos.curlydog​.com (external link) Just a Guy With a Camera Shooting His Daughter and Her Friends Dancing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Green_Tea
POTN Poet
Avatar
645 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Columbus, IN
     
Feb 13, 2011 18:31 |  #6

The decision to buy used or not is up to you. I've bought 90% of my gear used and have had nothing but great experiences and have gotten some great deals.

The IS/OS will help with theater(some but less so for dance). For theater you will typically only need 1/60 to 1/100 to stop the action. In that range and at 200mm IS will really help. My recommendation would also be a used 70-200 2.8 IS and an 85 1.8 (I have used both for indoor performances successfully). If you do decide to buy new, then I'd rather have the Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS. You would have the versatility of a zoom, the fast aperture and OS.


6D|7D| Sigma 50mm 1.4 EX| Canon 100mm L IS macro| Canon 24-70 II L| Canon MP-E 65| 600 EX-RT| MT-24EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Feb 13, 2011 19:04 as a reply to  @ Green_Tea's post |  #7

I am not sure how close you are getting, or if you are permitted to use flash.

Just thinking the Canon 135L and 85 1.8 would be a nice combo for this indoor shooting.
Both are offered on the B&S forum here on a regular basis. I have purchased 3 lens on that forum, I have been thrilled with both lens and I used the saved money to buy other "stuff".


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrscls
Goldmember
3,090 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 1716
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
     
Feb 13, 2011 19:13 |  #8

Mk1Racer wrote in post #11836582 (external link)
Or you could pick up a used 70-200 f/2.8 IS Mk I and a 85 f/1.8 from the classifieds here. Should be able to stay in or close to your budget.

Good advice here.


Sony A1, Viltrox 16mm f/1.8 FE, Sony 35mm f/1.4 GM, 24-70mm f2.8 GM II, 70-200mm F/2.8 GM OSS II, 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS, 1.4X TC, Flashpoint flashes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mk1Racer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,735 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Flagtown, NJ
     
Feb 13, 2011 20:45 |  #9

curlydog wrote in post #11836731 (external link)
Yes, I understand that :o) , the IS/OS would really be an advantage shooting theater is my thought

Mk1Racer I thought of that but used scares me to death when spending that kinda of money, probably irrational fear , but nonetheless fear.

A natural concern for someone that is new to the used market. With the exception of my 50 f/1.8, my 40D, and my 7D, everything else in my gear list was purchased used, off of these forums. The 50 f/1.8 and the 40D were bought new, the 7D was a refurb from Canon through the CLP (which I wouldn't have known about it were it not for this place). I have had no problems at all w/ the gear I've purchased from people on here. There are also other lenses that are no longer on the list (because I sold them to people on here) that I bought from members here. I didn't sell them because I had issues with them, I sold them because I upgraded.

This is a pretty decent community, and it's pretty rare that you hear of someone getting scammed or getting equipment that was not as advertised. The 30 days and 30 posts policy that was put in place 2 or so years ago has seemed to really stem the tide of shady people and scammers.

If you see something that you're interested in, check the seller's feedback in the feedback thread.

If I had to buy all my gear new, I'm sure there's stuff I wouldn't have.


7D, BG-E7, BGE2x2 (both FS), 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS (FS), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk I, 70-300 f/4-5.6L, 550EX, Kenko Pro300 1.4xTC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
themadman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
18,871 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Northern California
     
Feb 13, 2011 20:48 |  #10

The Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS is a great lens and since the recent price drop, it is at a good price as well. I would say go for the Sigma. I have shot plenty with the previous version of the lens and it was very good.


Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.​com (external link) | Gear List and Feedback | CPS Member | Have you Pre-Ordered Your 3Dx Yet? | HorusBennu Discussion | In honor of Uncle Steve, thanks for everything! 10-5-2011

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dalebmartin
Member
73 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Feb 13, 2011 20:51 |  #11

Just depending on the situation, a 135mm F2.0 might give you a little more speed if that is what you need.


Gripped Canon 7D,Canon 24-105mm F4 L, Canon 100 Macro IS L, 580EX II, Manfrotto 055CF, 70-200 2.8 Mk II L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Feb 13, 2011 21:46 |  #12

curlydog wrote in post #11836240 (external link)
So after a great deal of research and reading numerous threads here I am down to the the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM or the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM - both fit the $1500.00 budget and the two obvious differences are Brand(Dooh) and IS/OS

I am leaning toward the Sigma, I really could use the 4 stops of stabilization, I know my hands are not the steadiest.

I've shot with numerous copies of the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS as well as many different Canon 70-200 f2.8 MK1 and MK2 IS lenses. Recently I did some comparison shots between the OS and the MK2. While not directly related to your issue of the f2.8 L non-IS, I think the Sigma is an excellent choice based on what I found when compared to the amazing L IS MK2 (which is better than the L non-IS).

Overall, the Sigma OS was always behind the new MK2 but always put in a strong effort. I would take the new OS lens over any 70-200 f2.8 lens currently out except for the new MK2.

Here are some sample 100% center crops:

Sigma 70mm f2.8

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5283/5249587637_a6ce2424c4.jpg

Canon 70mm f2.8
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5085/5250190398_39b35fc549.jpg

Sigma 200mm f2.8
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5085/5249582967_45aa0358f7_b.jpg

Canon 200mm f2.8
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5202/5250185462_98f75e8182_b.jpg

Sigma 280mm f5.6
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5081/5250185686_35c6cb2cfd_b.jpg

Canon 280mm f5.6
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5086/5249583125_7621e1172b_b.jpg

Canon 70-200 F4 L IS at 280mm f5.6
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5163/5250185662_d47c0e1399_b.jpg

Tamron 70-300 VC USD at 280mm f5.6
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5122/5249583191_6e0f3da3aa_b.jpg

The Tamron 70-300 VC USD actually put in a solid performance too. Huge bang for buck telezoom lens in my book. See my comments and more crops here http://www.flickr.com …1/sets/72157625​445936481/ (external link) .



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
curlydog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Florida
     
Feb 17, 2011 21:08 |  #13

Thanks all, I am gonna pull the trigger in the AM


Canon 50D / Canon 6D
-Canon EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon 24-105mm L Sigma EF 500 DG Super Photoshop CC Tamron AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM Alien Bees 2-ab400 2-ab800 http://photos.curlydog​.com (external link) Just a Guy With a Camera Shooting His Daughter and Her Friends Dancing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,912 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
I want New GLASS and I want it bad
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
862 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.