Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Feb 2011 (Monday) 10:19
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Are you satisfied with the AF of the 5D MK II"
Owner - Yes
149
42.5%
Owner - Neutral
72
20.5%
Owner - No
55
15.7%
non-Owner - Yes
20
5.7%
non-Owner - Neutral
31
8.8%
non-Owner - No
24
6.8%

351 voters, 351 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

EOS 5D MK II - AF - let's try to clear this up

 
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:19 |  #1

OK, so I have an EOS 5D MK II and I love it - additionally I feel the AF is perfect - it does what it's supposed to do very well - for me anyway.

(And would you buy a pencil expecting to write with ink from an inkwell?)

I know that there are people on here who are very happy with the AF, and personally I don't think I would have liked the AF of the 7D -> why should the AF be "rocket science" (although I do understand that it's very useful for sports shooters)
Other people complain that they would like a more complex AF system - some have the camera some haven't.

So, to clear opinion up a bit, I'll offer a poll - 6 options -> like it, neutral, dislike it, then split between owners and non-owners.

I would like to see how the votes distribute, and if you would like to, do post as well.


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,743 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:26 |  #2

3 owners, 3 answers.

So far...


Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:29 |  #3

Tom W wrote in post #11840666 (external link)
3 owners, 3 answers.

So far...

We'll see how this skews ;)

-> 3 points aren't really enough, but if you had say 10 for both a normal distribution would be expected, anything off is "abnormal" and would show a trend (once it exceeds certain limits I think it was sigma^2 or something like that, I'm not a stats fan).


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:34 |  #4

(directed at the complainers, of which there are many on this forum)

I think people need to learn the difference between linear and cross points and understand the limitations of the body they purchased. If you want a full frame camera with more impressive autofocus from Canon, you should look into the 1DS series. Too expensive? Tough...

For me, the 5D does just fine. Then again, I know how to use the AF properly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,092 posts
Likes: 1593
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:34 |  #5

I'm a 5D owner and a 5DII owner. I love the camera and the MkII is my goto body, but the one thing I do not like about the camera is the AF. It is adequate but no where near as fast and accurate at my 7D. It is the one weakness this body has. If it were not for the stellar IQ, I think this body would have been a bust. Canon needs to look to it's nearest competitor and wise up.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:34 |  #6

I have a 5D, not a 5D Mark II so I picked non-owner and no. While the AF system certainly can be made to work, it was up to date on the original 5D and thus very much behind the times when the 5D Mark II was launched.

Keep in mind the D700 was released before the 5D Mark II. I think Nikon did a little better job with that round (D700 vs. 5D Mark II) in nailing the feature set that was desired by still photographers. The 5D2's saving graces are excellent IQ (not that the D700 doesn't match it) and video for those who desire such a thing.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:35 |  #7

Cesium wrote in post #11840713 (external link)
(directed at the complainers, of which there are many on this forum.

I think people need to learn the difference between linear and cross points and understand the limitations of the body they purchased. If you want a full frame camera with more impressive autofocus from Canon, you should look into the 1DS series. Too expensive? Tough...

There is, of course, the D700. 1Ds Mark III is not the only choice.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,092 posts
Likes: 1593
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:35 |  #8

Cesium wrote in post #11840713 (external link)
... you should look into the 1DS series. Too expensive? Tough......

To big... I would shoot a 1D in a heartbeat if it came in a xxD form factor.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elevenbangbang
Member
91 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Chicago
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:35 |  #9

I wish it was a bit better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:36 |  #10

JeffreyG wrote in post #11840723 (external link)
There is, of course, the D700. 1Ds Mark III is not the only choice.

Did you miss the "from Canon" part? :rolleyes:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:38 |  #11

Cesium wrote in post #11840734 (external link)
Did you miss the "from Canon" part? :rolleyes:

I guess if Canon can get a law passed banning people from buying other brands this would be a reasonable restriction.

Want a decent pickup truck from Chevy? Well, your choices are limited to what Chevy makes. Who cares? If I don't like the Chevy truck I'll buy from somebody else.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:39 |  #12

gjl711 wrote in post #11840725 (external link)
To big... I would shoot a 1D in a heartbeat if it came in a xxD form factor.

Agreed and this is the reason I switched to a 5D body from a 1D.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5DM2User
Member
76 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: North Pole
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:40 as a reply to  @ DetlevCM's post |  #13

The AF from this camera is ok ! Sorry, but people should stop talk/write some bla bla about that. Even in a VERY dark room with a 24-105L i can shoot some nice available light photo's at ISO 3200.
Without the need of software to remove noise ! About speed ? If the photographer has years of experience it isn't a problem to freeze some speedy cars or anything else ! But it could be just a little bit easyer to do with a 1D III...
Ok... ok... it isn't a speed-monster-camera !


2X Canon 1Dx, 2X Canon 5D Mark III, 2X 24-70 f2.8 II, 2X 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 2X 580EX II, L-24mm, L-35mm, L-50mm, L-85mm, A Mack truck full of Pro-Photography stuff, A bunch of Malinois to protect and serve. A Hummer to go where i want to go, to take photographs.... :lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:41 |  #14

JeffreyG wrote in post #11840750 (external link)
I guess if Canon can get a law passed banning people from buying other brands this would be a reasonable restriction.

Want a decent pickup truck from Chevy? Well, your choices are limited to what Chevy makes. Who cares? If I don't like the Chevy truck I'll buy from somebody else.

And none of this changes the fact that I was talking about Canon cameras in my statement. If you want a Nikon, go buy one. The D700 is a wonderful camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:41 |  #15

Actually - 2 of you threw up a good question about the original 5D.
I suppose you'd technically be a non-owner, but you have experienced the same AF -> so that would classify you a bit for the owner's vote.

On that note, especially if you have a 5D classic and something "better" you could do a very valid comparison and easily vote for the owners - I'll leave it up to you. This is also by no means scientific, but it should judge overall opinion pretty well.


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

13,686 views & 1 like for this thread
EOS 5D MK II - AF - let's try to clear this up
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is brotherbear86
878 guests, 375 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.