Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Feb 2011 (Monday) 10:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question to all POTNr's....

 
shutterpat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,538 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 11
Likes: 8327
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Orange, CA.
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:30 |  #1

Date code....does it really matter?


Follow me --> https://www.instagram.​com/shutterpat/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JEC
Senior Member
Avatar
334 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Centerville, Ohio
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:46 |  #2

For milk, yes.
For hardware and gear...not so much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:48 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Not really. However, people like new things. The newer the date, the better is supposed to be, despite the same lens could be using the same design for the past 7 years. Older date lens may be sold cheaper if buying it used. If you bought a new lens with an older date, this may mean that the seller couldn't move this lens out of the inventory for a while.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:51 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

JEC wrote in post #11840803 (external link)
For milk, yes.
For hardware and gear...not so much.


I believe the OP is referring to the date code on L lenses. Camera bodies??? I think they do but the manufactured date is usually indicated from the serial numbers. In fact, this date is even more important than the date code on the lenses. Take the 1dmarkIII for an example. Earlier models have AF issues. Only the later models with the later serial numbers that the AF is fixed.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Feb 14, 2011 10:56 |  #5

Condition and function are more important than date, but all else being equal I would take the newer lens.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JEC
Senior Member
Avatar
334 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Centerville, Ohio
     
Feb 14, 2011 11:32 |  #6

TooManyShots wrote in post #11840830 (external link)
I believe the OP is referring to the date code on L lenses. Camera bodies??? I think they do but the manufactured date is usually indicated from the serial numbers. In fact, this date is even more important than the date code on the lenses. Take the 1dmarkIII for an example. Earlier models have AF issues. Only the later models with the later serial numbers that the AF is fixed.

But, but, but :::gasp:::......maybe after making thousands or millions of the same camera or lens the robots are all worn out and aren't making them as good as they used to.
;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
funkyfones
Senior Member
Avatar
350 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Bradford, Uk
     
Feb 14, 2011 11:58 |  #7

Lens number 999999 is never any good, watch out for those


Gear: Afew bodies and afew pieces of glass | Flickr (external link)| Lens/cameras repairs and for sale | (external link)Website for camera/lens repairs (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Hoyer
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Feb 14, 2011 11:59 |  #8

As long as it works, don't care. My 70-200 looks like it has been in a war, and has been repaired several times (generally me dropping it!), but it still does the business!


Motorsport Photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 14, 2011 13:24 |  #9

tkbslc wrote in post #11840861 (external link)
Condition and function are more important than date, but all else being equal I would take the newer lens.

Yup. Especially if it still has some warranty balance left. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Feb 14, 2011 13:25 |  #10

JEC wrote in post #11841091 (external link)
But, but, but :::gasp:::......maybe after making thousands or millions of the same camera or lens the robots are all worn out and aren't making them as good as they used to.
;)

Well aside from bad batches, it is not so much what the robot did, but what humans, dust, corrosives and microbes have done to the lens since it left the robot's pincers.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,758 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Question to all POTNr's....
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
785 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.