Date code....does it really matter?
shutterpat Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 14, 2011 10:30 | #1 Date code....does it really matter? Follow me --> https://www.instagram.com/shutterpat/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JEC Senior Member 334 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Centerville, Ohio More info | Feb 14, 2011 10:46 | #2 For milk, yes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2011 10:48 | #3 Permanent banNot really. However, people like new things. The newer the date, the better is supposed to be, despite the same lens could be using the same design for the past 7 years. Older date lens may be sold cheaper if buying it used. If you bought a new lens with an older date, this may mean that the seller couldn't move this lens out of the inventory for a while. One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 532 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2011 10:51 | #4 Permanent ban
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 44 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 14, 2011 10:56 | #5 Condition and function are more important than date, but all else being equal I would take the newer lens. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JEC Senior Member 334 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Centerville, Ohio More info | Feb 14, 2011 11:32 | #6 TooManyShots wrote in post #11840830 I believe the OP is referring to the date code on L lenses. Camera bodies??? I think they do but the manufactured date is usually indicated from the serial numbers. In fact, this date is even more important than the date code on the lenses. Take the 1dmarkIII for an example. Earlier models have AF issues. Only the later models with the later serial numbers that the AF is fixed. But, but, but :::gasp:::......maybe after making thousands or millions of the same camera or lens the robots are all worn out and aren't making them as good as they used to.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
funkyfones Senior Member 350 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: Bradford, Uk More info | Feb 14, 2011 11:58 | #7 Lens number 999999 is never any good, watch out for those Gear: Afew bodies and afew pieces of glass | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeHoyer Senior Member 252 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | Feb 14, 2011 11:59 | #8 As long as it works, don't care. My 70-200 looks like it has been in a war, and has been repaired several times (generally me dropping it!), but it still does the business! Motorsport Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 14, 2011 13:24 | #9 tkbslc wrote in post #11840861 Condition and function are more important than date, but all else being equal I would take the newer lens. Yup. Especially if it still has some warranty balance left.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 44 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 14, 2011 13:25 | #10 JEC wrote in post #11841091 But, but, but :::gasp:::......maybe after making thousands or millions of the same camera or lens the robots are all worn out and aren't making them as good as they used to. ![]() Well aside from bad batches, it is not so much what the robot did, but what humans, dust, corrosives and microbes have done to the lens since it left the robot's pincers. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 785 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||