Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Feb 2011 (Tuesday) 11:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Between the 60d and 7d

 
.Davis.
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:33 |  #1

I'm looking to upgrade from my XS(1000d). I shoot in many low light conditions, do a lot of portraiture work, and would like video capabilities.

I'm wondering what specs of each camera would best suit my needs. I've compared them side by side, and I'm wondering if the multitude of auto-focus points is worth the extra money, since I normally use the center focus point and recompose anyways.

Let me know your thoughts! Thank you!


Flickr (external link)
Gear:
Canon 6d | 430EX II | 35L | 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L
FUJIFILM X-A1 | XC16-50 OIS | XF18R
Canon AE-1 | Canon AE-1 Program | 50 1.4 S.S.C. | 35-105 | 70-210

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magwai
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:36 |  #2

Not sure about video, but the still photo advantages are

- more FPS
- more sophisticated AF
- better build/weatherproofing

if none of those matter to you then the 60D should be fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manfesto
Senior Member
303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:37 |  #3

.Davis. wrote in post #11847940 (external link)
I normally use the center focus point and recompose anyways.

Then I don't think you're the group that the 7D is aimed at (action shooters who need 8FPS and a baby-1D AF tracking system).

Out of curiosity, is there a reason that you're not looking at the T2i or T3i? If you're happy with your XS's body size and battery life, they may be good options.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
10megapixel
"I'm a little slow"
Avatar
3,872 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Â…Â…Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:38 |  #4

.Davis. wrote in post #11847940 (external link)
I normally use the center focus point and recompose anyways.

Sounds as if you have already answered your own question.



Gear List & Feedback



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
.Davis.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:46 |  #5

manfesto wrote in post #11847957 (external link)
Then I don't think you're the group that the 7D is aimed at (action shooters who need 8FPS and a baby-1D AF tracking system).

As much as something like a micro-focus adjust would be great, I don't really pixel peep, nor have I, or do I plan to buy any third party lenses anytime soon.

How does the AF-system of something like the t3i compare with the 60d or 7d? and what are the main differences between the 60d and T3i?

manfesto wrote in post #11847957 (external link)
Out of curiosity, is there a reason that you're not looking at the T2i or T3i? If you're happy with your XS's body size and battery life, they may be good options.

I haven't looked into the T3i just because it's so new. Can anyone link me to a good comparison between the T3i and 60d?

I just don't want to sell myself short, I want to get the best camera I can afford that will last and not become out-dated quickly. Thanks for the quick responses guys, this is really helpful.


The size of the 60d/7d appeals to me, as well as the top-screen, I think that would also be really helpful to me.


Flickr (external link)
Gear:
Canon 6d | 430EX II | 35L | 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L
FUJIFILM X-A1 | XC16-50 OIS | XF18R
Canon AE-1 | Canon AE-1 Program | 50 1.4 S.S.C. | 35-105 | 70-210

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magwai
Goldmember
1,094 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Guildford, UK
     
Feb 15, 2011 11:53 |  #6

I think they are all (T2i/T3i/60D/7D) pretty close in AF if you only use the center point.

There are lots of reviews showing they are close in IQ.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:01 as a reply to  @ magwai's post |  #7

You can look at dpreview.com for a preview of the T3i and a review of the 60D. To me it looks like they have the same AF system though. From what you have said you shoot it doesn't look like there is much need for you to go to the 7D. I really like mine but I shoot a lot of sports which is the main reason I bought it.


5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
Full List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
.Davis.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:01 |  #8

magwai wrote in post #11848031 (external link)
I think they are all (T2i/T3i/60D/7D) pretty close in AF if you only use the center point.

There are lots of reviews showing they are close in IQ.

I know this may sound like a dumb question, as I know "it's not the gear, it's the photographer", BUT is the 60d just ok at everything it does? Does the 7d take good video, but it's AWESOME at still photos? I know that the ISO capabilities of both cameras can be stretched to 12,800, but is that something that the 7d can handle better because of it's light sensor?

It seems that the 60d is geared MORE towards someone interested in video, whereas the 7d has the video capability, but is geared more towards a still photographer


Flickr (external link)
Gear:
Canon 6d | 430EX II | 35L | 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L
FUJIFILM X-A1 | XC16-50 OIS | XF18R
Canon AE-1 | Canon AE-1 Program | 50 1.4 S.S.C. | 35-105 | 70-210

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,917 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2262
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:06 |  #9

.Davis. wrote in post #11848073 (external link)
I know this may sound like a dumb question, as I know "it's not the gear, it's the photographer", BUT is the 60d just ok at everything it does? Does the 7d take good video, but it's AWESOME at still photos? I know that the ISO capabilities of both cameras can be stretched to 12,800, but is that something that the 7d can handle better because of it's light sensor?

It seems that the 60d is geared MORE towards someone interested in video, whereas the 7d has the video capability, but is geared more towards a still photographer


If I was worried about video capabilities, I'd get a video specific camera.
I don't own, nor have I used a 60D, but I'd be surprised if the 7D wasn't a better DSLR in comparison.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WebDevGuy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,474 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 416
Joined Nov 2009
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:08 |  #10

What type of photographs do you typically take? Are you into birding for example? If so 7D's faster FPS is better. But, if not it may not be worth spending the extra $, depending on what you shoot and your shooting habits. Personally, I love my T1i, but I'm thinking of upgrading to the 7D for a few reasons. Since I'm growing as a photographer (technique, understanding, etc) it seems to be the next logical step for me personally.


7D Mark ii, T1i/500D, 17-55 2.8, 100-400L mk II - More Gear
Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, (and 230+ 100% ebay)
flickr (external link)
Join the group: Canon 7D Mark II + Canon 100-400mm L IS II on flickr (external link)
5 out of 4 people can't do fractions.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
.Davis.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:11 |  #11

robertnzana wrote in post #11848104 (external link)
What type of photographs do you typically take? Are you into birding for example? If so 7D's faster FPS is better. But, if not it may not be worth spending the extra $, depending on what you shoot and your shooting habits.

As stated before, low-light, portraiture, some landscape, and SOME automotive.


Flickr (external link)
Gear:
Canon 6d | 430EX II | 35L | 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L
FUJIFILM X-A1 | XC16-50 OIS | XF18R
Canon AE-1 | Canon AE-1 Program | 50 1.4 S.S.C. | 35-105 | 70-210

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yourdoinitwrong
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:12 |  #12

.Davis. wrote in post #11848073 (external link)
I know this may sound like a dumb question, as I know "it's not the gear, it's the photographer", BUT is the 60d just ok at everything it does? Does the 7d take good video, but it's AWESOME at still photos? I know that the ISO capabilities of both cameras can be stretched to 12,800, but is that something that the 7d can handle better because of it's light sensor?

It seems that the 60d is geared MORE towards someone interested in video, whereas the 7d has the video capability, but is geared more towards a still photographer

The video recording specs (resolution and fps) are the same for the 60D and 7D. The 60D adds audio gain control which the 7D does not have. The 60D also has the flip-out screen which may or may not be a plus depending on your point of view. Because the sensors in the 60D and 7D are very, very similar there is a negligible difference in still photo image quality. There are a lot of things the 7D has over the 60D but for what you are intending to use the camera for I honestly don't believe you will see a difference between them.


5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
Full List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manfesto
Senior Member
303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:16 |  #13

If you use only the center point, the T2i/T3i's center point is cross type with glass f/2.8 and faster, the 60D's center point is dual cross type (it's crossed with both a "T" and an "X", making it sensitive to horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines) with glass f/2.8 and faster. The 60D's center point will be more sensitive and catch focus better in low light.

That said, if you're not having issues with your XS catching focus in low light, T2i/T3i may be fine.

I want to get the best camera I can afford that will last and not become out-dated quickly.

I wouldn't worry about that, the T2i, T3i, 60D, and 7D all share the same sensor, and they'll all equally be outclassed by the next generation of cameras :). More importantly, they'll continue taking great pictures well past when the new models come out.

The only differences between the T2i and T3i is that the T3i has a swivel screen and wireless flash control. If neither of those would help what you shoot, look at the T2i first.

The differences between the T2i/T3i and 60D are as follows:

- bigger body
- some weather sealing
- second control dial on the back
- top LCD panel
- faster burst FPS, deeper buffer
- longer battery life
- bigger pentaprism viewfinder
- better 9-point AF system (all nine points are cross type, center is dual cross type)

If that sounds like it's worth the extra few hundred dollars over the Rebels, the 60D may be the way to go.

The differences between the 60D and 7D are:

- even bigger metal body
- even more weather sealing
- joystick instead of directional pad
- 8FPS burst mode
- 19-point AF system
- AF microadjust

For those that need these things, it is totally worth the extra money for the 7D over the 60D. I don't think that you sound like you need those things, though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HughR
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:24 |  #14

.Davis. wrote in post #11848073 (external link)
I know this may sound like a dumb question, as I know "it's not the gear, it's the photographer", BUT is the 60d just ok at everything it does? Does the 7d take good video, but it's AWESOME at still photos? I know that the ISO capabilities of both cameras can be stretched to 12,800, but is that something that the 7d can handle better because of it's light sensor?

It seems that the 60d is geared MORE towards someone interested in video, whereas the 7d has the video capability, but is geared more towards a still photographer

I've had my 60D for about 4 months and have taken 2,000 still photos and about 5 minutes of video. The 60D does an outstanding job with still photos, and most reviews indicate that it is as good as the 7D except for frames per second (5.3 for 60D vs. 8 for 7D). The 60D has cross-type sensors at all 9 AF points, while the T2i and T3i only have a cross-type sensor at the central point and non-cross types at the remaining 8 points.

So to answer your question, the 60D does an outstanding job producing spectacular 12"x18" prints from ISO 100 through 1600. I've also produced very good results (albeit with a little noise) at 3200 and 6400. ISO 12800 is usable in a pinch, but it's a significant increase from 6400 in noise.

Two final points: the 60D wireless flash system works flawlessly, even at up to about 20-25 feet outdoors as long as the sensor is facing the pop-up flash. Indoors there are generally enough reflections to permit shooting around corners in moderate sized rooms. I assume that the 7D is equally good, and probably also the T3i. Second, the 60D is extremely well made and fits my hands much better than the smaller T2i. The 60D has been criticized for being made out of plastic compared to the 7D, but remember: football helmets are plastic and survive enormous impacts!
Hugh


Hugh
Canon 60D, Original Digital Rebel (2003)
EFS 15-85mm IS USM, EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tokina 11-16mm
Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 430EX II,
Qbox 16 pro, Lastolite EZbox 24x24, Lumiquest Softbox III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
manfesto
Senior Member
303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 15, 2011 12:24 |  #15

.Davis. wrote in post #11848073 (external link)
I know this may sound like a dumb question, as I know "it's not the gear, it's the photographer", BUT is the 60d just ok at everything it does? Does the 7d take good video, but it's AWESOME at still photos? I know that the ISO capabilities of both cameras can be stretched to 12,800, but is that something that the 7d can handle better because of it's light sensor?

It seems that the 60d is geared MORE towards someone interested in video, whereas the 7d has the video capability, but is geared more towards a still photographer

Between the T2i, 60D, and 7D - same sensor, same image processor, same image quality (both movie and still), same high-ISO performance. The 7D can just shoot more of them more quickly (8FPS vs 5.3FPS or 3.7FPS) since it has two Digic IVs and the 60D and T2i only have one.

And actually, in some ways, the 7D is more geared toward video shooting than the 60D. The 60D must be put into video mode on the mode dial (which is all the way on the other side of the dial from "M" and "Av", annoyingly), the 7D has a switch for it right next to the record button so it's easier to switch between video and stills.

Unless you're shooting in situations where a really good tracking AF system or 8FPS will get you shots that are otherwise impossible (like shooting sports, or birds in flight), the 7D isn't going to get you shots the 60D or T2i couldn't.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,192 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Between the 60d and 7d
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
936 guests, 185 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.