So there have been a ton of megapixel related arguments on this forum lately. So I was thinking how many megapixels is really ideal. What is the perfect balance of noise and detail in your opinion?
| POLL: "How many megapixels is ideal?" |
4 or less | 4 1% |
6 | 0 0% |
8 | 9 2.3% |
12 | 79 20.4% |
16 | 87 22.5% |
20 | 51 13.2% |
24 | 30 7.8% |
30 | 8 2.1% |
36 | 13 3.4% |
As many as possible | 106 27.4% |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:33 | #1 So there have been a ton of megapixel related arguments on this forum lately. So I was thinking how many megapixels is really ideal. What is the perfect balance of noise and detail in your opinion? Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRisingArms Senior Member 351 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:37 | #2 I reckon that too big, and the amount of space you need for your photos would start getting annoying Bodies: Canon 500D | Canon EOS M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
acornsarebitter Member 156 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Oakland, CA, USA More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:39 | #3 |
arentol Goldmember 1,305 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Seattle WA More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:40 | #4 Depends on the format. 5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phreeky Goldmember 3,515 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Australia More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:40 | #5 So long as the image processor in the camera can handle it, and there are options for reduced resolution options in-camera, as many as possible please.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustAnEngineer Member 81 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Heart of Dixie More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:40 | #6 TheRisingArms wrote in post #11859426 I reckon that too big, and the amount of space you need for your photos would start getting annoying ![]() Storage just keeps getting cheaper. A 2 TB hard-drive is under $90, delivered. 16 GB flash memory cards are under $25, delivered. 40D, 17-55/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 Macro USM, 100-400L, 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:48 | #7 arentol wrote in post #11859437 Depends on the format. I thought about that, but I didn't want to complicate it. It's a useless poll anyway. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sangjiny Senior Member 760 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:53 | #8 tkbslc wrote in post #11859457 I thought about that, but I didn't want to complicate it. It's a useless poll anyway. ![]() Are you expecting me to vote on a useless poll?? Leica M9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Velorium Senior Member 493 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:53 | #9 As many as it takes to make the size of print that I want. Anything else and it's just a pissing contest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Csae Goldmember 3,350 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Feb 17, 2011 00:55 | #10 For event, 16. Feel free to call me Case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ELT_Photo Senior Member 301 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Royal Oak, MI More info | Feb 17, 2011 01:35 | #11 All of them! Passion - Dedication - Inspiration (and some gear)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 17, 2011 01:41 | #12 Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PMCphotography Goldmember 1,775 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Tasmania, Australia. More info | Feb 17, 2011 02:02 | #13 Well, I voted 12. That seemed the sweet spot to me. I'm shooting a 7d now and how often do I really use the full resolution? Not often. I almost use M JPG or mRAW, depending. Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newworld666 Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jan 2009 Location: on earth More info | Of course 40MP or more on a fullframe is a must !!!! Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Feb 17, 2011 02:06 | #15 50 years later when i came back to this forum and saw 36MP, im gonna laugh so hard, i get a heart attack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1732 guests, 151 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||