Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Feb 2011 (Thursday) 22:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portrait Professional 10

 
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 17, 2011 22:17 |  #1

I was messing with focal lenghts today and did some quickie self portraits. Since I put them into my computer I thought I'd mess with Portrait Pro 10 since I hadn't really given it much of a go since I did the upgrade.

What I noticed first off is that even with the default settings when you do the ligning up the crosshairs thing, it doesn't look so much like plastic. Then I slid the master slider down from the default setting which was 35 and brought it down to 12 and it looked pretty good except the eyes were just a little bit over sharp and bright to look real. So I went to that slider and pulled the master for eyes down a little and I was literally done. So I did another photo, this looks a lot nicer even for just general people shots that I wouldn't normally go to a lot of trouble processing, probably less than 5 minutes per shot, I'm liking this.


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Feb 18, 2011 07:17 |  #2

The thing I do not like about PP is that it is very poor at figuring out what is skin and what is not.

The "other" software, Portraiture is MUCH better...actually never misses.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 399
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Feb 18, 2011 08:01 |  #3

Yes, the default values seemed pretty strong to me in all versions that I've had.

The first thing I turn off is sculpting. Have still to save that as custom in v.10.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quad-Response
Senior Member
Avatar
716 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
     
Feb 18, 2011 08:23 |  #4

Agree with the points about not knowing where skin starts and ends but you can manually select area's that have been missed with the view/edit skin selection button in the panel on the right.


Chris
Canon EOS 1D Mark II for Sale - £450.00 ONO - PM For Details or see the Members Market

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Feb 18, 2011 11:27 |  #5

True, but one buys a pluging to save time... the more time, the better ;-)a


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quad-Response
Senior Member
Avatar
716 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
     
Feb 18, 2011 12:03 |  #6

bohdank wrote in post #11867785 (external link)
True, but one buys a pluging to save time... the more time, the better ;-)a

Agreed :cool:


Chris
Canon EOS 1D Mark II for Sale - £450.00 ONO - PM For Details or see the Members Market

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 18, 2011 13:31 as a reply to  @ Quad-Response's post |  #7

Portrait professional has provided lots of tools to allow you to get the look that you want. Painting in the area of what should be skin takes a few seconds. Plug ins are great but, imo, they are not supposed to a one click solution. They are are, and so is PP, a great time saver but the user still has to think for themselves.

There are lots of plug ins out there and which one is the right one is a matter of opinion. The one that is right for you is the one that you find good results with and that you learn to master its capabilities.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barkingspud
Senior Member
Avatar
511 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Chi-Town Burbs
     
Feb 18, 2011 19:44 |  #8

ssim wrote in post #11868516 (external link)
Portrait professional has provided lots of tools to allow you to get the look that you want. Painting in the area of what should be skin takes a few seconds. Plug ins are great but, imo, they are not supposed to a one click solution. They are are, and so is PP, a great time saver but the user still has to think for themselves.

There are lots of plug ins out there and which one is the right one is a matter of opinion. The one that is right for you is the one that you find good results with and that you learn to master its capabilities.

Winner!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,190 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Portrait Professional 10
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2853 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.