Is 1D4 and 1Ds3 AF the same?
Is ID AF better than 7D?
I want to understand the top end of the range better. Please explain to me.
magwai Goldmember 1,094 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Guildford, UK More info | Feb 18, 2011 05:16 | #1 Is 1D4 and 1Ds3 AF the same?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
big_g Goldmember 1,064 posts Gallery: 418 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 2224 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Lincolnshire UK, Live in Scotland More info | Feb 18, 2011 05:24 | #2 1D4 AF is different from the 1D3S. More manually selectable focus points, different (and I guess faster) software, better predictive focus, better tracking.... The list goes on Very lucky to have a lot of nice toys
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOS_uk Member 109 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Feb 18, 2011 05:37 | #3 1D4 for anything other then low light, low light shooting = 1DIII. 1DM2N, 1DIV, 5D2, 10D , TS-E 17L F4, 17-40L F4, 24-105L F4, 35L 1.4, 50 1.4, 85L II 1.2, 100 2.8 Macro, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 135L F2 , 300L 2.8 IS, 550Ex, 580Ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2011 06:51 | #4 EOS_uk wrote in post #11866323 1D4 for anything other then low light, low light shooting = 1DIII. Its interesting that the AF failures that people complained about in the 1dIII, make it probably the best low light focusing camera among canon/nikon current models. If you only shoot with the centre AF, heck the 5D2 is good ![]() If you tell us what you want to shoot, you will get better advice. It is not a specific request I just want to understand as much as possible about AF across the range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember 4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 18, 2011 06:54 | #5 Let me tell you this. Saying the 1DIII and good AF is an oxymoron Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOS_uk Member 109 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Feb 18, 2011 07:04 | #6 smorter wrote in post #11866469 Let me tell you this. Saying the 1DIII and good AF is an oxymoron he he he, at least it works on non sunny days 1DM2N, 1DIV, 5D2, 10D , TS-E 17L F4, 17-40L F4, 24-105L F4, 35L 1.4, 50 1.4, 85L II 1.2, 100 2.8 Macro, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 135L F2 , 300L 2.8 IS, 550Ex, 580Ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cristphoto Goldmember 1,052 posts Likes: 72 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Maryland More info | Feb 18, 2011 09:52 | #7 The 1D4 AF system has been modified from the 1D3 and 1DS3 bodies. All three work exceptionally well. I've not shot with the 1D4 but my 1D3 bodies are head and shoulders better than my previous 5D's. 1DX MK II, 5D MKIV x2, 24L II, 35L II, 50L, 85LIS, 100LIS Macro, 135L, 16-35LIS, 24-105LIS II, 70-200LIS, 100-400LIS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 18, 2011 09:54 | #8 EOS_uk wrote in post #11866323 1D4 for anything other then low light, low light shooting = 1DIII. This...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2011 12:59 | #9 nicksan wrote in post #11867314 This... All depends on your definition of low light. I don't shoot no contrast targets in the dark so I don't have any low light issues with my 1DIV.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edmyloo Senior Member 861 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Feb 18, 2011 13:04 | #10 Is the 1d4 that bad in low light? Or is the 1d3 just exceptionally good? If I were to switch from my XSi to a 1d4 for low light AF, would I notice a drop in speed? Because I've always wondered whether it was actually bad, or it was just bad to people spoiled by GREAT AF.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 18, 2011 13:34 | #11 HKGuns wrote in post #11868295 All depends on your definition of low light. I don't shoot no contrast targets in the dark so I don't have any low light issues with my 1DIV. f2.8 1/160 ISO12800 low to medium contrast. Actually it probably doesn't have to be that low.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Feb 18, 2011 13:36 | #12 edmyloo wrote in post #11868324 Is the 1d4 that bad in low light? Or is the 1d3 just exceptionally good? If I were to switch from my XSi to a 1d4 for low light AF, would I notice a drop in speed? Because I've always wondered whether it was actually bad, or it was just bad to people spoiled by GREAT AF. The combination of low light and low contrast is what gave the 1D4 I used to own problems. The 5DMKII (center AF point) was actually better and the 1DMKIII has no suck issues, period.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 18, 2011 13:36 | #13 1D4 but the 7D is very good and more than adequate for most uses. If you can't get good results with the 7D, it is prolly user error, poor lenses, or you are taking shots of some really nuts action. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davekadolph "Fix the cigarette lighter" 6,140 posts Gallery: 1 photo Joined Mar 2007 Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse More info | Feb 18, 2011 18:25 | #14 nicksan wrote in post #11868553 The 5DMKII (center AF point) was actually better and the 1DMKIII has no suck issues, period. LOL--great Freudian slip. Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2011 20:15 | #15 ^lol! Make yourself heard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1455 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||