For wildlife, wildbirds I am not a fan of the 100-400. EF 400/5.6 is a much better choice. It is sharp even with a 2x TC on a monopod, MF of course. But, now we are getting into the area where your technique will make all the difference.
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Feb 20, 2011 09:19 | #31 For wildlife, wildbirds I am not a fan of the 100-400. EF 400/5.6 is a much better choice. It is sharp even with a 2x TC on a monopod, MF of course. But, now we are getting into the area where your technique will make all the difference. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Supersignet Senior Member 504 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Feb 20, 2011 09:34 | #32 I'd look for a Used Sigma 120-300 f2.8 and hook it up with a 1.4 tele later on. Price will be dropping soon on the non-OS models soon. Great lens, unbeatable versatility. Canon 5Dii, Sigma 24mm f1.8, Sigma 50mm f1.4, Sigma 85mm f1.4, Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX Macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 Macro, Canon 135 f2L, Zenitar 16mm f2.8 fish eye (on the way)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Feb 20, 2011 10:42 | #33 But 300 is just not long enough. I sold my copy of the Sigma 120-300/2.8. Did not take TCs well and too much money. General rule for a birding lens: Get the longer lens even if it is slower. I do think the new 120-300/2.8 OS will be wonderful for many outdoor sports. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 20, 2011 14:43 | #34 Markh852004 wrote in post #11875185 Thanks again guys, i think ive settled on the canon 100-400mm. Cant wait to order it! 100-400mm is a fantastic lens. Its so good if you sold it in 3 years time you would get most of your money back, providing you look after it Chas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nightcat Goldmember 4,533 posts Likes: 28 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Feb 20, 2011 17:44 | #35 For any zoo that I've ever been to, 200mm won't do! Some photos can be taken with a 300mm, but my 400mm 5.6 is the best zoo lens I have. I've also used the 1.4 extender with the 400mm which works out well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
outback Member 206 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada More info | Feb 20, 2011 17:55 | #36 I've been fortunate enough to have both the 70-300L and now the 100-400L. Between the two the 100-400 wins hands down for outdoor anything, except portraits maybe. The 70-300 has amazing IQ period. Awesome IS and is lighter, but the 100-400 IMO is still a better outdoor lens for it's versitilaty and extra reach ( I happen to like the push pull zoom). It's no slouch for sharpness with good technique either. I don't care so much about the IS, but weather sealing would be nice. Just me and my elph 300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
encphotogjoe Goldmember 1,362 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: North Carolina More info | Feb 20, 2011 19:08 | #37 I personally doonot think you can go wrong with the 100-400. Canon 7d 100-400 mm zoom.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 20, 2011 19:31 | #38 The 100-400 is a great lens, so useful. You will love it! If you are going to spend the money, you won't regret it. Get what you want, within reason. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2011 19:16 | #39 Gonna grab the 100-400, im super excited except amazon are now out of stock, ah well, they will get more in a few days.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2011 19:37 | #40 Markh852004 wrote in post #11895016 Gonna grab the 100-400, im super excited except amazon are now out of stock, ah well, they will get more in a few days. Thanks for all the comments again, really helped with me purchasing my first good glass lens ![]() I shall post my first picture when i get it ![]() Mark--Just saw this----I have a 100x400MM on my 7D and really really like this lens-----not the best in low light (you should be home by low light anyway) but I give it a 9.999 on a scale of 10----you won't be disappointed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Feb 22, 2011 19:39 | #41 Gatornole wrote in post #11895147 ... (you should be home by low light anyway)... Naw...just switch lenses and shoot some landscapes or something with a tripod. If you're out shooting, I say don't go home until the light is gone and the clouds roll in - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop 8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Feb 22, 2011 22:59 | #42 Snydremark wrote in post #11895165 Naw...just switch lenses and shoot some landscapes or something with a tripod. If you're out shooting, I say don't go home until the light is gone and the clouds roll in (or you get hungry, that's always a good excuse, too)Why switch? The Pump can handle landscapes too. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EvanIdler Goldmember 1,600 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2005 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Feb 22, 2011 23:40 | #43 Although I enjoy my Sigma 150-500 OS which is a great lens, don't rule out the older IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
winnipegk5 Member 33 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | I have been happy with the 100-400. My technique leaves a bit to be desired but you can't blame the lens for that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
minh2pac Senior Member 362 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: New Orleans, LA More info | enjoy your new lens. I LOVE mine Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1846 guests, 112 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||