I done this last year when I had my 7D and Tamron 17-50 2.8
Let me know what you guys think. Thanks in advance
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DownsPhotography Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Feb 18, 2011 23:55 | #1 I done this last year when I had my 7D and Tamron 17-50 2.8 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Autonomous Senior Member 720 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: NYC More info | Feb 19, 2011 16:46 | #2 you have a nice gear and more than enough of lighting equipment, you gotta use your creativity more. with that being said, these pics looks very amateurish and has the feel of just plain snap-shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
collierportraits Goldmember 1,896 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Virginia Beach, USA More info | Feb 19, 2011 17:01 | #3 "I done this...?" 5D3 | 16-35L | 45 TS-E | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L | 24-70L | 70-200 II L | 580s | Zero, TT & Crumplers | and an X100!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 19, 2011 19:41 | #4 I can't see and idea or concept in the image. Adrian My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edge100 Goldmember 1,920 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Feb 19, 2011 21:13 | #5 The cake shot is ok. The others are flat and don't really do much for me. Street and editorial photography in Toronto, Canada
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Feb 20, 2011 00:24 | #6 |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Feb 20, 2011 00:26 | #7 Autonomous wrote in post #11874882 you have a nice gear and more than enough of lighting equipment, you gotta use your creativity more. with that being said, these pics looks very amateurish and has the feel of just plain snap-shot. my honest .2cents i can't make out what it is in #3. the only decent one is the last one I agree with you. at that time. I had no idea how to use DoF etc. I shot like f4-5.6 the entire wedding. Thanks again for your input (yes I love honest) | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Feb 20, 2011 00:28 | #8 collierportraits wrote in post #11874958 "I done this...?" ![]() Ok, I'd simply try a little shallower DOF in most of these. Everything is in focus and it becomes distracting. As to the black and white, everything blends together and you have to really look to see the bride and groom. Perhaps this can be fixed in post...? Keep shooting! Thanks yeah for some reason I was unsure about DoF. It seem to me like if it was 2.8 nothing would be in focus besides the point I had the target on | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Feb 20, 2011 00:31 | #9 Darkwand wrote in post #11875708 I can't see and idea or concept in the image. Many images are head on and that is booring and what everyone wth a P&S will take as well. I love those shoes you could have played a little more with them, the first image is a semi good idea i would have used a silouette of the shoes and exposed towards an open window had i done something like that. No:2 is just bad angle selection, those shoes are jus screamign to be photographed up close with that dress laying in the background slightly out of focus. No:3 unuseable, i throw away alot of pictures like this every time i shoot. The swing probably looked nice but this is the wrong angle for it. No:4 don't like the huge mass of blown out sky in the background the dress looks overexposed? Tilting the image is a no no, they're kissing zooming in is a better idea you'd get the flowers and the couple with a Bokeh'ish tree behind them. No:5 you need to photograph the "horsie-car" slightly from the side to give the image depth, i'd move to the left so one can see more of the path it will go up and move the driver out from behind the couple's heads. No:6 not much expetience with cakes and table ornaments but better surroundings the the drapes in the background would do wonders. Maybe go behind it and get the guests in the background also move the camera lower. Thanks man! I love the honesty. Thanks again. I will take this advice and run with it for my next wedding. | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1658 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||