Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Feb 2011 (Saturday) 23:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question about 'print size' and sharpening in PS

 
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Feb 19, 2011 23:43 |  #1

When sharpening and editing photos, I'm not sure if this is correct, but I've heard it's best to sharpen images in "print size".

I usually set my images to 12x8in at 300 resolution, but when I hit the zoom tool then 'print size' up at the top, the image displayed is much smaller than a 12x8.

I feel like I'm just not getting something. If the image represented is smaller than an actual 12x8 image, how can I be sure that I'm sharpening correctly to fit that size of a print.

If someone could point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 20, 2011 01:39 |  #2

How big in inches does it actually display at?

And, what is the resolution and dimensions in pixels it shows?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Feb 20, 2011 02:08 |  #3

If I put a ruler up to my screen, its 7.75x5.25in.

The pixel dimensions of my images are 3600x2400.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 20, 2011 02:43 |  #4

Well, not sure what's going on, unless Photoshop is using a crazy figure for its screen resolution to use when displaying a document (my preferences use an approximate value of 100 ppi to juggle between two screens).

I open an image and check Image/Image size and one opened at the default ppi of 240 and showed the dimensions in inches to be around 10x15 or so (I had to run upstairs and interrupt someone to do this and run back down here so it's an approximation) and when I clicked the zoom tool and chose Print size it opened a window, the image was enlarged to the proper approximat size in inches, although it over-filled the window so you have to scroll to see it!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Feb 20, 2011 02:58 |  #5

Hmm... This is frustrating me.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Feb 20, 2011 03:06 |  #6

the image was enlarged to the proper approximat size in inches, although it over-filled the window so you have to scroll to see it!

That's the key point. Are you seeing all the image or only a 7.75 x 5.25 section?
At any rate, that print sized zoom is not much used since the quality of the display is not as good when the resize calculations are complicated by needing a 29% or a 37% zoom. The easy ones, 50% (1/2) or 25% (1/4) are better, use them to get an approximation of print sharpening and/or noise - monitor pixels don't behave like ink drops on paper.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Feb 20, 2011 03:18 |  #7

tzalman wrote in post #11877356 (external link)
That's the key point. Are you seeing all the image or only a 7.75 x 5.25 section?
At any rate, that print sized zoom is not much used since the quality of the display is not as good when the resize calculations are complicated by needing a 29% or a 37% zoom. The easy ones, 50% (1/2) or 25% (1/4) are better, use them to get an approximation of print sharpening and/or noise - monitor pixels don't behave like ink drops on paper.

I did some more lurking around, and this is exactly what I found. Thanks for reaffirming this!


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 20, 2011 04:45 |  #8

pxchoi wrote in post #11877388 (external link)
I did some more lurking around, and this is exactly what I found. Thanks for reaffirming this!

Are you saying you saw only the portion of the image that fit into the "normal" window and that you could scroll to see the whole image? If so, that's normal, since the image is too big to view all in the same window!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Feb 20, 2011 10:07 |  #9

What is your screen size and resolution and what setting do you have in

Edit/Preferences/Units and Rulers

Screen Resolution

It should be

Measure the width of your screen and divide it by your horizontal resolution setting.

I believe Photoshop defaults to 80 or something around there which is not high enough for your typical LCD panel.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Feb 20, 2011 11:15 |  #10

tonylong wrote in post #11877573 (external link)
Are you saying you saw only the portion of the image that fit into the "normal" window and that you could scroll to see the whole image? If so, that's normal, since the image is too big to view all in the same window!

No, people were saying that I should look at the screen at 25, 50, and 100% to get a better representation of sharpening.

bohdank wrote in post #11878403 (external link)
What is your screen size and resolution and what setting do you have in

Edit/Preferences/Units and Rulers

Screen Resolution

It should be

Measure the width of your screen and divide it by your horizontal resolution setting.

I believe Photoshop defaults to 80 or something around there which is not high enough for your typical LCD panel.

My 'Print Resolution' = 300, 'Screen Resolution' = 72, and 'PostScript' = 72 points/inch.

I changed the screen resolution to 110.77 (1440/13) and now when I hit print size it comes out in the correct size. Thanks!


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Feb 20, 2011 11:19 |  #11

pxchoi wrote in post #11878739 (external link)
No, people were saying that I should look at the screen at 25, 50, and 100% to get a better representation of sharpening.

100% only; that is pixel-for-pixel on your monitor.

All other views are interpolated, so you cannot be sure what you have.

To know what you'll have in print, you have to print it.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,071 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Question about 'print size' and sharpening in PS
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2787 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.