titi_67207 Senior Member  496 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Strasbourg, France More info | Mar 15, 2012 06:45 | #31 jrbdmb wrote in post #14086617  I'm good with the current 135L for now. It's time for Canon to address real issues in their lens lineup like the 35mm f2 and 50mm f1.4. +1. Wide lens (focal length to 50mm in fact), primes or zooms, have better reason to be updated. Canon 5D MkII + Sony A7 + 24x36 & 6x6 B&W film cameras .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeyBaccala Goldmember  More info | Mar 15, 2012 07:06 | #32 fotoworx wrote in post #11910781 Damn I love my 135mm Same here! MOkoFOko wrote in post #11907005 You people are crazy thinking that the 135L needs to be updated  It's a real gem in the Canon lineup. There's so much they need to focus their attention on before the 135L...I couldn't agree more! JOEY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrbdmb Goldmember  1,291 posts Likes: 12 Joined May 2011 More info | Mar 15, 2012 15:59 | #33 Speaking of lens updates - who exactly was asking for $800 slow WA primes with IS like the 24 2.8 and 28 2.8? Not to mention the rumored 18-135 IS II - where is the uproar for an update to this lens? At least Canon has a sense of humor. Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Mar 15, 2012 16:00 | #34 jrbdmb wrote in post #14092744 Speaking of lens updates - who exactly was asking for $800 slow WA primes with IS like the 24 2.8 and 28 2.8? Not to mention the rumored 18-135 IS II - where is the uproar for an update to this lens? At least Canon has a sense of humor. The video people.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iLvision Cream of the Crop  5,766 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Western pot hole city, Massachusetts More info | Apr 09, 2012 10:44 | #35  Permanent bangonzogolf wrote in post #14092751 The video people. Yup, the video people. You can use a 24mm IS and film handheld and it will look like you’re using a stabilizer. Of course and’s also small and lighter. Ilya | Gear |•• flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrbdmb Goldmember 1,291 posts Likes: 12 Joined May 2011 More info | Apr 15, 2012 11:12 | #36 Sure but for that price get the EFS 17-55 IS and you have a lot more versatility. Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheDeepThought42 Member 63 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Apr 16, 2012 06:07 | #37 jrbdmb wrote in post #14269300 Sure but for that price get the EFS 17-55 IS and you have a lot more versatility. Yes but that's EF-S versus EF, also the 17-55 is still going to be alot bigger/heaver than the primes...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Apr 16, 2012 09:08 | #38 jrbdmb wrote in post #14269300 Sure but for that price get the EFS 17-55 IS and you have a lot more versatility. and for that price you can get the Sigma 17-50 2.8 and even more lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop  6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Apr 18, 2012 16:21 | #39 135L surely does not need an update. It is nearly perfect. I don't care how old the design is! Built like a tank, amazing IQ and no need for IS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeyBaccala Goldmember More info | Apr 19, 2012 02:03 | #40 I am starting to hate my 135. The reason being is that my subject is sharp as a tack and the bokeh is so intense it makes the image look fake! LMFAO JOEY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1153 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
