Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Feb 2011 (Monday) 19:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide/ macro lens advice

 
hello ­ people
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 21, 2011 19:38 |  #1

As a novice I'm looking for some sound advice on what lenses to buy.

I have a Canon 60D with the 18-135mm kit lens and the cheap 50mm 1.8 lens.

I would like to shoot:

1. landscape shots (particularly night shots of cityscapes etc/ but day time too) & general day time city shots

2. some macro stuff...such as water drops, insects and that kind of thing


So anyway, I was considering these:

Canon EFS 10-22mm f3.5-4.5
Canon EFS 60mm f2.8

I don't have huge amounts of money to outlay...I dunno...$1500...around that much...

So, given what I have and what I think I should get...for my target type of shot...what do you think/ recommend?

Am I on the money? Close? Way off?

thanks


60D, x100S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Feb 21, 2011 19:44 |  #2

for insects i'd go for the 100mm f2.8 macro to give yourself some more working distance...also you didn't mention an external flash...so if you don't have one...put that into the budget as well...you should have enough to pull it off...but i think a flash is practically a necessity for macro shots


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hello ­ people
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 21, 2011 19:50 |  #3

I will get a flash too, I have that in mind.

Why, technically the 100mm? Can you explain that to me? A 60mm would give a wider shot right?


60D, x100S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Feb 21, 2011 19:52 |  #4

hello people wrote in post #11888205 (external link)
I will get a flash too, I have that in mind.

Why, technically the 100mm? Can you explain that to me? A 60mm would give a wider shot right?

well typically with macro shots the idea is more about magnification than wide...since both the lenses give 1:1 magnification...the wideness won't really matter...but you'll have to physically be closer with the 60mm in order to get 1:1 than the 100mm would require...so if you're taking shots of bugs they might be scared off...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hello ­ people
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 21, 2011 19:56 |  #5

I get it. Thanks for the explanation. How about the 100mm for water drops and that kind of thing...how is the depth of field? Is it way, way narrow?

And by the way, how do those macro lenses go when you just take a shot of something...as in, not way close up...if I used it like a standard lens and took shots of a person in a room from 4 meters away...does it still work as that kind of photo lens?


60D, x100S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Feb 21, 2011 20:00 |  #6

hello people wrote in post #11888259 (external link)
I get it. Thanks for the explanation. How about the 100mm for water drops and that kind of thing...how is the depth of field? Is it way, way narrow?

DOF on any macro shots is going to be really shallow...hence why the flash is really necessary cause you'll be stopped down to f10/11 or so to get more in focus, which can cause really slow shutter speeds...for water drops though the 100mm should work out fine...it's all just about different working distances between the two lenses...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anthony11
Goldmember
Avatar
2,148 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Feb 21, 2011 20:27 |  #7
bannedPermanently

Macro lenses in the 90-105mm range are often used for portraits, where their flat focal plane and sharp optics perform well.


5D2, 24-105L, 85mm f/1.8, MP960, HG21, crumbling G6+R72, Brownian toddler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hello ­ people
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 21, 2011 21:10 |  #8

So the 100mm could double up for macro and portrait? I suppose yes


60D, x100S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ coop
Member
120 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NYC
     
Feb 21, 2011 22:06 |  #9

some of the best portraits I've seen have been shot on macros. Canon and other. Personally, I choose the 100L as it boasts both great macro capabilities as well as very sharp portraits. The Non-L also is a great choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anscochrome
Senior Member
Avatar
443 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Jan 2010
     
Feb 21, 2011 22:13 |  #10

One thing with macro +portrait=every pore, pimple,scar, blemish, psoriasis flaking in ALL its super crisp shining glory. Be prepared to give it a run through Portrait Pro 10 plugin when you are done:)


http://anscochrome.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hello ­ people
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 22, 2011 05:18 |  #11

Thanks for the tips.

How about the 10-22mm wide lens...is it good for such things as night cityscapes and day landscapes?


60D, x100S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tilt24
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 22, 2011 05:44 as a reply to  @ hello people's post |  #12

Yep, given your big budget ($1500) that's the widest you are going to get on the 1.6 sensor (with the exception of some third party lenses).

The Canon EF-S 10-22 will be good, and I'd probably recommend also with others the 100 2.8 macro (non-L version) over the 60 2.8 macro just to give a bit more leeway or working room in distance.

The remainder excess cash you can drop for a better tripod set up and some quality multi-coated polarizer + full ND filters for your lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
albatros
Member
71 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Feb 22, 2011 05:47 |  #13

hello people wrote in post #11890511 (external link)
Thanks for the tips.

How about the 10-22mm wide lens...is it good for such things as night cityscapes and day landscapes?

If that focal range suits your needs and style, yes. For my landscape shooting, the 70-200 is regularly too short... Independent of the lens, you'll probably need a good tripod, and a polariser can be pretty useful, too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheRisingArms
Senior Member
351 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 22, 2011 05:55 |  #14

For a wide lens, try the Sigma 8-16. it's the widest you can get, and the wider the better usually.


Bodies: Canon 500D | Canon EOS M
Lenses: Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | EF-M 22mm f/2
Flashes: YN-568EX | 90EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SOX ­ 404
Senior Member
Avatar
574 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2006
Location: I'm a nomad
     
Feb 22, 2011 06:23 |  #15

Canon 10-22mm
Canon 100mm Macro


AJ
1 x Canon 5DSR | 2 x Canon 5D2 | 8-15L | 16-35L | 17-40L (dead) | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L | 180L | 70-200 2.8L IS
Aquatica UW Housing | INON Z240 | Ikelite DS-161 | Sola 600 | 2 x Sola 2000
My Flickr  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,722 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Wide/ macro lens advice
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
516 guests, 153 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.