my ocd is acting up and i really want the 24-105L, but having never used this lens, i really wonder if it is worth the price, since i already have the 28-135, gold band.
both are IS, the 135 is sharp at 105, plus has a little better reach.
i already have the 17-40L so the lower end isn't as important, and with the 70-200L, i just need to fill in this mid zone.
so anyone out there who has/ had both can you please give me a good reason to drop or not drop 8 bills for a red ring? (other than the kool factor)
i also have the canon 28-105 3.5-4.5 gold band lens, with macro...
which is not used as much as it should be.
(plus a 50 1.4)
even got 2 2x and 1.4x adapters... ocd can be very expensive.
and because someone will ask....
i take pictures of everything, from landscapes, pets, cemeterys, sports, aircraft, sometime even people...
(ocd= only canon dude!)