Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Feb 2011 (Friday) 10:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Query: Double Exposure Mode?

 
GJim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,233 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Bridger Montana, USA
     
Feb 25, 2011 10:40 |  #1

I'm reading 'The Hot Shoe Diaries' by Joe McNally.

He shoots 'the dark side of the force', mentioning that some of his cameras have a 'double exposure mode'. Neither my 50D, nor my 7D, have this mode (at least not mentioned anywhere in the user-manual). Do any Canon bodies have this capability?

I realize that you could accomplish the effect in PP, but an 'in-camera' feature would also be nice. Not that I would use it all that often - just wondering if any of the Canons can do this.

Edit: I certainly knew how to accomplish this on 35mm film bodies.


G'Jim c):{- ... 2x 50D (Both Gripped), 2x 7D (Both Gripped), 2x 5D Mk II (One gripped), 1x 60D, assorted glass (10-800mm), sundry accoutrements.
The beginner clicks the shutter and says "Let's see what I got." ... The experienced photographer thinks "How can I capture what I see?"
My Photography: http://www.gjimphotogr​aphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tomash
Member
Avatar
135 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 25, 2011 11:21 |  #2

Just use Photoshop to combine the frames.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hennie
Goldmember
1,265 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 104
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
     
Feb 25, 2011 12:56 |  #3

If it is really dark you can also keep the shutter open (B) and use your flashgun multiple times.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Feb 25, 2011 17:32 |  #4

The only option is to combine images in PP.

No DSLR can do actual multiple exposure on a single frame. It's impossible.... aside from Hennie's idea or a long exposure with multiple pops of flash and/or some light painting with flash or something like that... which isn't really multiple exposure.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Feb 25, 2011 19:39 as a reply to  @ amfoto1's post |  #5

But there are DSLR cameras which will bring the images together inside the camera, so they seem to allow double exposure. From the user's point of view, it's as if they did.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
svarley
Senior Member
Avatar
592 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Mar 2009
Location: LA, CA
     
Feb 25, 2011 20:30 |  #6

That's a Nikon feature. With canon, you're on your own, not that I consider it a particular limitation. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Feb 26, 2011 02:56 as a reply to  @ svarley's post |  #7

I had that concern when I made the jump to digital and it was a waste of energy. SHooting double-exposures was always a tricky thing. It was far too easy to screw up and over-expose one thing, or get something just slightly off. With a digital sensor you can't do that at all because the sensor would have to "hold" the previously exposed state while being charged up for a second exposure. So the only way to do it is with software. The question is - do you want the camera to have complete control over this, or do you want to control it? Personally I much prefer doing it myself because i can get it exactly how I want it instead of what some algorithm decides is appropriate. Plus, once you combine them in the camera, you can't "undo" it.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GJim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,233 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Bridger Montana, USA
     
Feb 26, 2011 08:16 |  #8

Thanks to all for comments. As I said in my original post, I'm not sure that I would use it all that much even if available - more curious than anything else as to whether the feature was available on any Canon body and, if so, how well it worked.

kfreels - your hiatus and mine are closely matched (along with the overwhelmed part!)


G'Jim c):{- ... 2x 50D (Both Gripped), 2x 7D (Both Gripped), 2x 5D Mk II (One gripped), 1x 60D, assorted glass (10-800mm), sundry accoutrements.
The beginner clicks the shutter and says "Let's see what I got." ... The experienced photographer thinks "How can I capture what I see?"
My Photography: http://www.gjimphotogr​aphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,395 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
     
Feb 26, 2011 09:50 |  #9

I can see how it might be more fun and challenging to do double exposures in-camera, but in terms of control and final image it must be better to do it in Photoshop. It's of course not the same thing, it would take away some of the charm that comes from randomness and difficulty to control the results.


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddyav
Senior Member
348 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Muskegon,MI
     
Feb 26, 2011 13:06 |  #10

You could also hold the shutter open(like bulb mode)and use a black card in front of the lens(tightly)and use it as the shutter.This might take some trial and error but....


7D (gripped),Tokina 12-24 4.0,Canons;24-70L 2.8,50 1.8mk1,70-200L 4.0 IS,300L 4.0 IS,400L 5.6.,TC 1.4II Speedlights:580EXII,22​0SX-2 AB 800 w/ stands,monopods,tripod​s,bags,filters,etc...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steelhead77
Member
79 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 26, 2011 19:44 as a reply to  @ eddyav's post |  #11

These shots were done using double, even quadruple exposure using my 60D using exactly this method ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Canon 60D, Canon18-135 USM IS, Canon 75-300 IS, Sigma 105 f2.8 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Feb 26, 2011 23:07 as a reply to  @ steelhead77's post |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

kfreels wrote in post #11916723 (external link)
I had that concern when I made the jump to digital and it was a waste of energy. SHooting double-exposures was always a tricky thing. It was far too easy to screw up and over-expose one thing, or get something just slightly off. With a digital sensor you can't do that at all because the sensor would have to "hold" the previously exposed state while being charged up for a second exposure. So the only way to do it is with software. The question is - do you want the camera to have complete control over this, or do you want to control it? Personally I much prefer doing it myself because i can get it exactly how I want it instead of what some algorithm decides is appropriate. Plus, once you combine them in the camera, you can't "undo" it.

^^^ Couldn't agree more!
In-camera double exposure is just a relict from not so good ol' times..


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

18,724 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Query: Double Exposure Mode?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1549 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.