Canon 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS vs Tamron SP 70-300 f/4-5.6 Di VC USD

thanks much for the info on the canon. My reason question was for CountryBoy who just said "Buy the Tamron".
Like I said, I do like it, but just want to know why you do.
so far leaning in favor of canon.
Thanks for your opinions!

the tamron is a bit more money...but offers things like a non rotating front element, FTM, and a faster focusing system, FF compatability, 50mm more reach...i'm guessing I.Q. is probably close enough on both to be a wash....so if those other perks are worth the money to you...go for the tamron...if not save your money with the canon

actually 250 -> 300 *on crop* the gain is quite a lot.

HyperYagami wrote in post #12022249
actually 250 -> 300 *on crop* the gain is quite a lot.

What??? You need to explain what you are talking about.

spur wrote in post #12024444
What??? You need to explain what you are talking about.

250mm x 1.6 crop = 400mm

300mm x 1.6 crop = 480mm

Bokehlicious wrote in post #12024450
250mm x 1.6 crop = 400mm

300mm x 1.6 crop = 480mm

250mm = 250mm
300mm = 300mm

Equivalent FOV

My vote is for the 55-250 cause i have one

wallleyes wrote in post #12024614
My vote is for the 55-250 cause i have one

I have both. I like the Tamron much more.

Owned both, IQ, build, AF speed goes to the Tamron but of course, it does cost more.

I've never owned or experienced any Tamron lenses so I can't speak for them. However, I have owned the 55-250 before and I must admit, that lens if amazing! Especially for its price too! Its light and equipped with 3-4 stops of IS. I didn't own it for long since most of my shots were indoors, but outdoors, this baby will shine!

55-250IS is a great lens for <$200. Tamron 70-300VC has a quite a few improvement over 55-250IS though. AF is quiet and fast. Faster AF will help for wild-life and sports. Tamron also has longer warranty (6 vs. 1 yr in the US) Tamron also includes a hood as well.

For intro to telephoto, a used 55-250IS is great on the budget. For an extra $200, Tamron will get you quite a bit more. If you can afford it, get it. It will keep you happy longer and more time to save for those big telephotos.

I replaced my 70-200mm f4 non-is with the tammy. I was planning on upgrading to the canon 70-200mm f4 IS, but I was curious about the tammy. I am pretty happy with it so far. The colors aren't as nice and sharp as the canon, but only when I am comparing pics side by side at 100%. For me, the awesome VC and extra reach was worth the loss in sharpness and color.
Another plus of the tammy over the 55-250mm is that you can use the tammy on a full frame.
However, for wildlife you need more reach.

Bokehlicious wrote in post #12024450
250mm x 1.6 crop = 400mm

300mm x 1.6 crop = 480mm

So it's a 20% increase in both cases - i.e. the same improvement.

gcogger wrote in post #12026677
So it's a 20% increase in both cases - i.e. the same improvement.

Yea. Or like I was getting at... 250mm vs 300mm