Even with f/2.0 set, I'm not getting nice and blurry backgrounds. Any ideas?
dharrisphotog Goldmember 2,331 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Feb 28, 2011 15:28 | #1 |
Merlin_AZ Senior Member 872 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Feb 28, 2011 15:55 | #2 The only time I get blurry background with f/2 is when I'm really close to the subject.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DH22 Member 197 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Canada More info | Feb 28, 2011 15:56 | #3 Unfortunately the only way to get a blurry background is by getting real close to your subject due to the cameras small sensor. Theres some other factors as well but it was explained to me this was the main reason. S95/T2i
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ApGfoo Member 30 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | I'm still a beginner but trying optically zooming the full 3.8x on your subject and then have the background be as far away from your subject. The aperture will be at F4.9 but will give you a shallower depth of field vs leaving your settings at F2 not zoomed plus you'll have less lens distortion cos of the longer focal length. This is what I do with my Canon SX130 with decent results but with the Canon SX130, I'm zooming in 12x optically. Either that or get shallow depth of field with macro mode on a small object being your subject. It doesn't work well with portraits though since you'll be too close to your subject. apgfoo.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Mar 01, 2011 13:38 | #5 You can always doctor the photo as well. Go into elements (or whatever program you use), highlight your subject, then inverse the selection so that everything BUT your subject is highlighted. Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Mar 01, 2011 13:38 | #6 You can also shoot in macro. This sometimes works. Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 02, 2011 08:39 | #7 Ya, that's the way it goes. I guess the f/2 on this P&S camera are for letting in more light so don't even think about depth of field. Going to Mardi Gras in New Orleans in 2 days so I'm just making sure I have a handle on all my settings and what to shot that will come out looking like great photos instead of standard P&S fanfare. I'll have to focus on WHAT to shoot that doesn't require lots of depth of field. When I'm taking photos of my friends and people, use Macro Mode, extend the zoom and face detection. D800 | Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art | Nikkor 85mm 1.8G | Nikkor 70-200 2.8G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Mar 04, 2011 02:07 | #8 Sensor size has more to do with DOF than aperture, and these have small sensors compared to your SLR kit. At 28mm f2.0, the S95 is like 18mm f6 on APS-C Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgara Goldmember 2,336 posts Likes: 8 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA More info | Mar 05, 2011 06:08 | #9 Razeus wrote in post #11931134 Even with f/2.0 set, I'm not getting nice and blurry backgrounds. Any ideas? As others have said, getting blurred backgrounds with a P&S is difficult due to the physical limitations of the components in the camera. The small sensor size is the main culprit, but without that you would not have a pocketable camera. EOS 5D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xhack Goldmember 1,283 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Edinburgh, Lothian More info | Mar 05, 2011 08:17 | #10 tgara wrote in post #11959908 As others have said, getting blurred backgrounds with a P&S is difficult due to the physical limitations of the components in the camera. The small sensor size is the main culprit, but without that you would not have a pocketable camera. ![]() The best you can do is to (1) stop the lens down to f/2, (2) get close to the subject, and (3) set a long focal length , e.g., 105mm. It is the best you can do, but the trouble is that, when you zoom to 105mm (equiv.), the maximum aperture available is ƒ4.9 - not the bestest aperture for narrow DoF. ~ Wallace
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgara Goldmember 2,336 posts Likes: 8 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA More info | Mar 05, 2011 08:46 | #11 xhack wrote in post #11960216 It is the best you can do, but the trouble is that, when you zoom to 105mm (equiv.), the maximum aperture available is ƒ4.9 - not the bestest aperture for narrow DoF. Correct. As I said, there are physical limitations to a camera of this size that make it difficult to get limited DOF. This is one of those. EOS 5D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Mar 05, 2011 09:57 | #12 Look what this guy did (and, yes, he was close to the subject). Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auto-clicker Senior Member 819 posts Likes: 37 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Looks like it's been software enhanced.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeFairbanks Cream of the Crop 6,428 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Mar 05, 2011 14:54 | #14 That's okay. It's the end product that counts. Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterseaford Hatchling 2 posts Joined Jul 2011 Location: seaford . victoria. australia More info | Jul 02, 2011 23:57 | #15 G'day - I have a real problem - am old and just bought this S95 for our first and only trip To UK and Europe.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1260 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||