Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Feb 2011 (Monday) 22:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

non-printable web only

 
HammerCope
Senior Member
803 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Nebraska
     
Feb 28, 2011 22:41 |  #1

Im trying to make images to send by email size 640x480. I want them to look ok but if printed not very good or if put on web to look ok what do I need to do. When I crop then use the resize they still come out looking good enough for most people when printed. I want them web usable only. Any ideas I'm lost.


Pete
Canon 40D & 7D 24-70 F2.8 L 70-200 F4 L Norman 400B, AB800,AB1600 White Lighting 3200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Feb 28, 2011 22:48 |  #2

What are you trying to prevent, or force? Are you trying to force a print purchase from you vs. printing whatever you posted on the web?

If you want to just 'ruin' the photo, then watermark them strongly along one edge so that they can see the photo but if they printed it they'd have to crop it so heavily it wouldn't be the same.

EDIT: removed bad NFO; doh!


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HammerCope
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
803 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Nebraska
     
Feb 28, 2011 23:08 |  #3

Im selling them for web use. To be used on Facebook or just viewing on their own computer.


Pete
Canon 40D & 7D 24-70 F2.8 L 70-200 F4 L Norman 400B, AB800,AB1600 White Lighting 3200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 01, 2011 03:56 |  #4

HammerCope wrote in post #11933766 (external link)
Im selling them for web use. To be used on Facebook or just viewing on their own computer.

For Web use, you have to understand that monitors will vary in how images look. For a "quick" approach, just get something that looks good on your monitor. For something more "solid" (advanced/complicated) look at the stickies in this section at color problems/color management.

S.Horton wrote in post #11933703 (external link)
What are you trying to prevent, or force? Are you trying to force a print purchase from you vs. printing whatever you posted on the web?

In either case, what software are you generating the jPGs with?

Generally speaking, if I wanted to make sure they could play on Facebook but not print, I'd render them at 72 dpi. At 96 dpi, they could get printed, but not very large.

Sam, pal, the "ppi" resolution means nothing to digital images and Web display. The Web displays an image at 100%, meaning that the image displays at "full bore", meaning you have to display an image on the Web that has been sized so that a full-sized image will display "normally", not huge.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 01, 2011 04:50 |  #5

Generally speaking, if I wanted to make sure they could play on Facebook but not print, I'd render them at 72 dpi. At 96 dpi, they could get printed, but not very large.

Dpi means nothing, the tag can be changed in ten seconds and the image size will remain the same. Pixels is the only thing that counts.

OP - Other than putting a semi-transparent watermark over the image there is nothing you can do. 480 x 640 (or 720) pixels is probably the smallest you can post for reasonable viewing and there will be people who will print them at 4x6 inches on plain paper and a cheap office printer and be entirely satisfied. If they want to spend a little money almost any lab will resample them from 120 ppi to 240 ppi or 300 ppi and sell them a print.

I'll tell you a little story: Last week I sent off a file to my regular lab to be printed at 20x30. I usually drive over to them and take my photos on a usb key, but this time I uploaded it through the 'net after preparing it at 6000x9000 pixels (300 ppi). The upload took about 15 minutes and when it completed I got an automated announcement, "Your file can be printed at any size up to 200 x 300 inches." They were willing to accept a 30 ppi image!


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Mar 01, 2011 05:51 |  #6

tonylong wrote in post #11934606 (external link)
For Web use, you have to understand that monitors will vary in how images look. For a "quick" approach, just get something that looks good on your monitor. For something more "solid" (advanced/complicated) look at the stickies in this section at color problems/color management.



Sam, pal, the "ppi" resolution means nothing to digital images and Web display. The Web displays an image at 100%, meaning that the image displays at "full bore", meaning you have to display an image on the Web that has been sized so that a full-sized image will display "normally", not huge.

...except for the case of HTML having the browser render it differently, correct? Great story, so, I'm re-dacted. (thx)


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HammerCope
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
803 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Nebraska
     
Mar 01, 2011 05:54 |  #7

I am using CS3.


Pete
Canon 40D & 7D 24-70 F2.8 L 70-200 F4 L Norman 400B, AB800,AB1600 White Lighting 3200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Mar 01, 2011 07:09 |  #8

Use a watermark, and accept that the quality of web images will be good enough (for some people) to print them.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Mar 01, 2011 08:23 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #9

Maybe also use a Flash website, so your images can't be captured with a simple mouse click action?


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 01, 2011 09:26 |  #10

ChasP505 wrote in post #11935305 (external link)
Maybe also use a Flash website, so your images can't be captured with a simple mouse click action?

Good idea.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Mar 01, 2011 09:46 |  #11

René Damkot wrote in post #11935066 (external link)
Use a watermark, and accept that the quality of web images will be good enough (for some people) to print them.

I agree. I've had people tell me that they took a 600px 80KB web image & made a "Great looking!" 8X10" print from it! I tell them to please tell people that I didn't make it for them.

A BIG watermark with © & maybe the text underneath saying "This image was stolen from..." probably wouldn't make much difference, either. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HammerCope
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
803 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Nebraska
     
Mar 01, 2011 11:18 |  #12

I'm selling it the right to them to be used on a FB page or personal at home viewing. It will have a copyright mark on it. I just don't want them to be able to make a good print at home.


Pete
Canon 40D & 7D 24-70 F2.8 L 70-200 F4 L Norman 400B, AB800,AB1600 White Lighting 3200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,729 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
non-printable web only
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1706 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.