Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 05 Mar 2011 (Saturday) 19:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Royal Enfield

 
Nmahooch
Goldmember
Avatar
3,815 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 135
Joined May 2010
Location: NYC
     
Mar 05, 2011 19:47 |  #1

Looked like something out of MASH. UK version.. Interesting.

IMAGE: http://i1122.photobucket.com/albums/l534/Nelmahooch/IMG_6187.jpg

http://phlotography.sm​ugmug.com/Nelson-Malave (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texaskev
Goldmember
Avatar
1,469 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 278
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Austin & Dallas Texas
     
Mar 05, 2011 23:55 |  #2

Wow, I've never seen one before. They did a very nice restore on it. Great capture.


Canon 1DX II, 1DX, 11-24 F4 L, 100 F2.8 L, 16-35 F2.8 L II, 17-40 F4 L, 24-70 F2.8 L II, 24-105 F4 L II, 70-200 F2.8 L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5572
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 06, 2011 00:13 |  #3

I was expecting a rifle....:| Nice pic, though :)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooTall
Senior Member
Avatar
443 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, Ca. USA
     
Mar 06, 2011 01:06 |  #4

texaskev wrote in post #11964470 (external link)
Wow, I've never seen one before. They did a very nice restore on it. Great capture.

That's a brand new bike. Enfields have been built in India for many years and now they are starting to export them.

Kurt O.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,421 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Mar 06, 2011 02:58 |  #5

We've had Indian produced Royal Enfields in the UK for some time. That looks like an updated model and not the original RE Bullet model that was virtually identical to the 1950's version.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 06, 2011 12:27 |  #6

Snydremark wrote in post #11964543 (external link)
I was expecting a rifle....:| Nice pic, though :)

None of the rifles manufactured by the Royal Small Arms Factory Enfield was ever known as a Royal Enfield, they were commonly called Lee Enfield's, although there were many variants.
For those in the USA the rifle that is most often thought of as an Enfield, was pretty much a rip off of the German Mauser G98 rifle and built under licence by several different manufactures in the USA including Winchester and a typewriter manufacturer. This was in the early days of world war one. After making many of these rifles for us in .303 calibre, when the USA entered the war in 1917 the design was put back into production for the US forces but this time in the American 30-06 caliber.
I hope that this information is of some interest to readers.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronin ­ Silv
Goldmember
Avatar
4,907 posts
Gallery: 216 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 168
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Kent UK
     
Mar 06, 2011 13:38 |  #7

BigAl007 wrote in post #11966947 (external link)
None of the rifles manufactured by the Royal Small Arms Factory Enfield was ever known as a Royal Enfield, they were commonly called Lee Enfield's, although there were many variants.
For those in the USA the rifle that is most often thought of as an Enfield, was pretty much a rip off of the German Mauser G98 rifle and built under licence by several different manufactures in the USA including Winchester and a typewriter manufacturer. This was in the early days of world war one. After making many of these rifles for us in .303 calibre, when the USA entered the war in 1917 the design was put back into production for the US forces but this time in the American 30-06 caliber.
I hope that this information is of some interest to readers.

Alan

Utter rubbish the Lee Enfield design has nothing to do with the Mauser G98. The Lee-Enfield rifle was derived from the earlier Lee-Metford, a mechanically similar black powder rifle, which combined James Paris Lee's rear-locking bolt system with a barrel featuring rifling designed by William Ellis Metford. The Lee action cocked the striker on the closing stroke of the bolt, making the initial opening much faster and easier compared to the "cock on opening" of the Mauser design.


Film gear Rollecord V, Yashica A, Halina 35X, Olympus Trip and Canon EOS 5, 500 and 300v
Stusio Visage Facebook (external link) flickr (external link) studiovisage.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
L.J.G.
"Not brigth enough"
Avatar
10,463 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Jul 2010
Location: ɹǝpun uʍop
     
Mar 06, 2011 13:50 |  #8

TooTall wrote in post #11964760 (external link)
That's a brand new bike. Enfields have been built in India for many years and now they are starting to export them.

Kurt O.

Picked it in one Kurt. The front end is a dead giveaway


Lloyd
Never make the same mistake twice, there are so many new ones, try a different one each day
Gear Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 06, 2011 16:29 |  #9

Ronin Silv wrote in post #11967336 (external link)
Utter rubbish the Lee Enfield design has nothing to do with the Mauser G98. The Lee-Enfield rifle was derived from the earlier Lee-Metford, a mechanically similar black powder rifle, which combined James Paris Lee's rear-locking bolt system with a barrel featuring rifling designed by William Ellis Metford. The Lee action cocked the striker on the closing stroke of the bolt, making the initial opening much faster and easier compared to the "cock on opening" of the Mauser design.

No it's not utter rubbish. Please re read my original post. I was specifically referring to what we here in the UK would know as a P14 (.303) or P17 (.30-06). Also nowhere in my original post did I mention the "Lee Enfield" specifically by name. In the USA these rifles (P14/P17) are generally known as Enfield rifles, as that is where they were designed. The P14/P17 design is based on the Mauser G98 action. I was aiming my reply to the post that I quoted in my first post who just happened to be American. There are relatively few Lee-Metford, Long Lee-Enfield, SMLE or Lee Enfield No4 rifles in circulation over there. They do though have a lot of P17's left over from W.W.1 and thousands of them were converted to sporting rifles in the twenties and thirties.
Personally I think that the cock on opening action is nicer to operate, although the Lee design is known to be faster. The rear locking Lee action is also superior for accuracy at longer range (800 yards and over) both in the original .303 calibre and in rifles re-barreled in 7.62×51 NATO (308WIN), but not to the same extent as in the original .303, to the Mauser or P14, although personally I think the original Mauser action superior in inherent accuracy at ranges to 600 yards.

Alan

Sorry I should have re read my first post again properly. I had not realised that I had typed "Lee Enfield" in my post. Sometimes what I think and what I actually type end up being slightly, but significantly different in resulting meaning.


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5572
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 06, 2011 21:43 as a reply to  @ BigAl007's post |  #10

Didn't mean to derail the thread; but thanks for the info on the rifles :)


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
miccullen
Member
Avatar
240 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Spokane, Washington State, USA
     
Mar 06, 2011 23:28 |  #11

BigAl007 wrote in post #11968332 (external link)
No it's not utter rubbish. Please re read my original post. I was specifically referring to what we here in the UK would know as a P14 (.303) or P17 (.30-06). Also nowhere in my original post did I mention the "Lee Enfield" specifically by name. In the USA these rifles (P14/P17) are generally known as Enfield rifles, as that is where they were designed. The P14/P17 design is based on the Mauser G98 action. I was aiming my reply to the post that I quoted in my first post who just happened to be American. There are relatively few Lee-Metford, Long Lee-Enfield, SMLE or Lee Enfield No4 rifles in circulation over there. They do though have a lot of P17's left over from W.W.1 and thousands of them were converted to sporting rifles in the twenties and thirties.
Personally I think that the cock on opening action is nicer to operate, although the Lee design is known to be faster. The rear locking Lee action is also superior for accuracy at longer range (800 yards and over) both in the original .303 calibre and in rifles re-barreled in 7.62×51 NATO (308WIN), but not to the same extent as in the original .303, to the Mauser or P14, although personally I think the original Mauser action superior in inherent accuracy at ranges to 600 yards.

Alan

Sorry I should have re read my first post again properly. I had not realised that I had typed "Lee Enfield" in my post. Sometimes what I think and what I actually type end up being slightly, but significantly different in resulting meaning.

FYI the SMLE and other Lee-Enfield variants are far better known in the US than the P-14, or it's US variant the P-14, there are far more surplus smellies floating around than the mauser knock offs :)

I have owned 2 of the Lee-Enfields myself, both very fun rifles to shoot, very smooth and fast operators


Noob Gear: EOS Rebel XT, 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-80mm, 55-250mm IS, and a bag full of other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,025 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Royal Enfield
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1048 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.