Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 12:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What size should I make my file?

 
XTshooter
Member
Avatar
168 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 08, 2011 12:09 |  #1

I'm designing a 12" x 48" sign/flyer that showcases some of the sports products that we have available. Once designed, we're going to print it through our lab.

I'm having trouble deciding what size I should make the finished file, as I know a full 12" x 48" file in Photoshop would be a nightmare to work on and save. I'm planning on doing it at 300dpi, but I'm wondering if designing it at 50% or 25% of final size would still yield a decent enough print. We don't need it to be crystal clear, but I don't want to lose so much quality that it looks bad. Any thoughts?

Any help is appreciated! Thanks!


Shooting Fujis and Nikons at work, and Canons on my free time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 08, 2011 13:49 |  #2

One thing you can clear up: is this image going to be a composite/combination of shots or a single image?

If a single image, well, you certainly don't want to downsize the file! At 12x48 you will have to do some panorama-style cropping -- an uncropped image will print a 12x18, so you will need to decide whether to crop a bunch or do some "creative framing". But think this through -- if you print at say 100 ppi, that would require a file size of 1200x4800 pixels but would produce a sub-par quality print. Up that to 150 ppi and you need 1800x7200 pixels, which is more of a printable quality.

For a composite, I don't see a big problem with using a 300 ppi image, but you can get away with a smaller resolution/file size, expecially since as you say you don't need a "crystal clear" print. I'd work with your print lab/shop and do test shots with small crops of the image that you can look at from the planned viewing distance to judge the results.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XTshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
168 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 08, 2011 15:03 |  #3

Thanks Tony. Yes, it will be a composite of several smaller images with some text added as well. We shoot a lot of kids sports leagues, so the idea is to have a large print that shows some of the products we offer. I'm thinking I'll talk to our rep at the lab and make sure a smaller file size at 300ppi would work. Thanks for your input!


Shooting Fujis and Nikons at work, and Canons on my free time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 08, 2011 15:46 |  #4

Well, cool, you can get "decent" results at, say, 150 ppi, and then the quality of the print just keeps going up with the more resolution.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 08, 2011 16:10 |  #5

smaller file size at 300ppi

You should understand that a smaller size will be a lower ppi. Ppi is pixels per inch, so 12x48 at 300 ppi can only be 3600 x 14400 pixels. However, for a poster that will not be viewed close up resolution in the area of 180 - 200 ppi will be sufficient.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 08, 2011 17:58 |  #6

XTshooter wrote in post #11980705 (external link)
Once designed, we're going to print it through our lab.

If by "our lab" you mean a professional print lab, they're the ones to ask about this. Different labs have different needs.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Mar 09, 2011 04:33 |  #7

XTshooter wrote in post #11980705 (external link)
as I know a full 12" x 48" file in Photoshop would be a nightmare to work on and save.

If you have a halfway decent computer, 3600 x 14400px isn't too bad.
I've done quite a few images with more pixels on an ancient G5.

If you want to work at a lower resolution for the images, you could let the text be vector based, so it will remain sharp.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,182 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
What size should I make my file?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is slipper1963
1450 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.