Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Apr 2003 (Tuesday) 21:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Coverin contact to stop a lens down

 
GenDEM
Member
79 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Apr 22, 2003 21:16 |  #1

Hi there

Now bear with me here, I'm new to the SLR scene.

I have a 10D and I was tonight attempting to shoot an indoor soccer game with a 100-300 4.5-5.6 lens. Of course, at max zoom, the lowest I could go was 5.6...this lead to most shots being dark to avoid blur, even at 3200 ISO.

I've read in other forums that there are contacts you can cover on an EF lens to trick the camera into letting you stop down lower than the lens is rated. It sounds good...but there must be a reason why a lens is rated the way it is.

Before I go and try this for myself, can someone offer an explanation, or point me at one, of why lenses are rated with an f number at all, the ramification of shooting below the lens's rated minimum F stop, and if anyone does this in Real Life or if it's a half wit posting rumors that I fell for?

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henkbos
Senior Member
923 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Apr 23, 2003 01:30 |  #2

This seems magic to me: piece of tape and you gained 2 stops while the physical hole that the light passes through remains the same!
The only thing I can imagine is that the tape will stop passing that info from the lens to the camera and will somehow trick the exposure meter.

Curious to other responses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bluebomberx
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 23, 2003 02:00 |  #3

The purpose of taping contacts on lenses is to retain auto focus capability at f/8. Canon EOS cameras will not attempt to auto focus if the maximum aperture of the lens in reported smaller than f/5.6. This happens when using a 2x teleconverter on lenses such as the Canon EF 70-200 f/4 L. The tape prevents the aperture data from going back through the contacts on the lens mount, thus retaining auto focus because the camera will think it is still at f/5.6 or lower.

-Richie


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henkbos
Senior Member
923 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Apr 23, 2003 02:07 |  #4

Ritchie,

Can you tell us which contact?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bluebomberx
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Joined Apr 2003
     
Apr 23, 2003 02:56 |  #5

I don't have a clue, but search around on the D30/D60/10D forums over at http://www.robgalbrait​h.com (external link) to find out. I haven't needed to do this with any of my lenses so never bothered to learn more than I already posted ;)

-Richie


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger_Cavanagh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,394 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Apr 23, 2003 04:22 |  #6

It's explained here:

http://www.fredmiranda​.com/TipsPage/ (external link)

Regards,


=============
Roger Cavanagh
www.rogercavanagh.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yance
Member
136 posts
Joined Mar 2003
     
Apr 23, 2003 08:27 |  #7

gendem wrote:
I have a 10D and I was tonight attempting to shoot an indoor soccer game with a 100-300 4.5-5.6 lens. Of course, at max zoom, the lowest I could go was 5.6...this lead to most shots being dark to avoid blur, even at 3200 ISO.

Physically the aperture of the lens can open so far, so if you set the maximum aperture that is what you will get. Stuck with the conditions you had for indoor soccer you will either have to use a flash or invest in a better lens, either an f4 or f2.8. There really is no other way around it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenDEM
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
79 posts
Joined Sep 2001
     
Apr 23, 2003 09:03 |  #8

Thanks for all the feedback. This shoot was an experiment that likely won't be repeated, but it has made me think a bit differently about lens selection...it's one thing to read about lens metrics, and quite another to see the effect of them right in front of you. Perhaps the 28-135IS would have been a better choice of a starter lens.

Thanks again




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,950 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Coverin contact to stop a lens down
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1744 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.