Sorry, Apple buying Canon would lead to even greater price increases with lesser technology. But those cameras would be pretty and so trendy!
luciddreamer Senior Member 861 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: NE Indiana More info | Mar 10, 2011 14:40 | #16 Sorry, Apple buying Canon would lead to even greater price increases with lesser technology. But those cameras would be pretty and so trendy! materialism ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndecentExposure Goldmember 3,402 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Austin, Texas More info | Mar 10, 2011 14:46 | #17 luciddreamer wrote in post #11996107 Sorry, Apple buying Canon would lead to even greater price increases with lesser technology. But those cameras would be pretty and so trendy! Imagine the problems since we hold our cameras with our right hands! - James -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aaron.dunlap Goldmember 1,805 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: USA More info | Mar 10, 2011 14:48 | #18 Ah the infamous shutter attenuation. Hold it the wrong way and you can only sync at 1/20.... Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
luciddreamer Senior Member 861 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: NE Indiana More info | Mar 10, 2011 14:52 | #19 Indecent Exposure wrote in post #11996151 Imagine the problems since we hold our cameras with our right hands!
materialism ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Mar 10, 2011 14:56 | #20 Would the offspring of Apple and Canon be an Apple Cannon? They have Potato Launchers, so why not. pewpew
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beretta5spd Member 44 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 10, 2011 15:16 | #21 So you're saying there's a chance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My 2011 Daily Photoblog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sth_ Senior Member 811 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Europe More info | Mar 11, 2011 08:45 | #22 cptrios wrote in post #11994165 The great thing about Thunderbolt is that it's backwards-compatible (well not exactly backwards...side-backwards? Cross-backwards?) with USB. So you could have both in one port on the camera. I could be wrong there...but I'm fairly sure that'd be possible. Not directly, but you could push pretty much anything over that port. If a company wants to build a Thunderbolt-to-USB-cable, it would certainly be possible (although the cable would need an embedded USB controller chip). cptrios wrote in post #11993941 One far-fetched but not entirely out-of-the-question thought is that Canon could be one of Apple's potential "huge acquisitions." Apple has an enormous, enormous amount of cash-on-hand, and there are weekly rumblings as to who the targets might be (from Kodak to Adobe to freaking Sony). I'd put the odds on this at around 100,000:1. Not going to happen. My completely outdated Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aaron.dunlap Goldmember 1,805 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: USA More info | Mar 11, 2011 08:55 | #23 More info on this today.... Canon is reportedly "excited" about thunderbolt. Imagine uploading footage into Final Cut at 10gigabits/sec... or for that matter, transferring photos off your camera that fast. Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sth_ Senior Member 811 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Europe More info | Mar 11, 2011 09:07 | #24 Even current CF cards are capable of speeds around 3x as fast as USB2 can manage. My completely outdated Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aaron.dunlap Goldmember 1,805 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: USA More info | Mar 11, 2011 10:09 | #25 Apple is bypassing USB3. It will never be on any Apple product. Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sth_ Senior Member 811 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Europe More info | Mar 11, 2011 10:18 | #26 aaron.dunlap wrote in post #12001168 Apple is bypassing USB3. It will never be on any Apple product. I don't think so. The reason is more likely to be that USB3 isn't supported by any current Intel Chipset (which is what Apple uses in their machines). The only way to integrate USB3 into an Intel system is by using a seperate, third-party controller chip. And Apple just doesn't seem to care enough about USB3 to go down that route. My completely outdated Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dman65 Junior Member 22 posts Joined Jan 2002 More info | Mar 11, 2011 22:00 | #27 I sure hope Apple does not buy Canon. I would hate to switch to Nikon after all these years of using Canon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ImCBParker Senior Member 893 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Mar 11, 2011 22:05 | #28 dman65 wrote in post #12004847 I sure hope Apple does not buy Canon. I would hate to switch to Nikon after all these years of using Canon. I think your collection is safe. Canon 5DIII, 7D, 40D, 8-14L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24L, 50L, 85 f1.8, 100L, 135L, 1.4 Extender, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, and too many lights and accessories to list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead 4,287 posts Likes: 350 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Mar 13, 2011 01:09 | #29 You people are taking this too far. The Macbook Air has been chirped for barely being able to handle Adobe programs, yet now the iPad can handle and EDIT RAW photos? Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cptrios Goldmember 1,745 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France More info | Mar 13, 2011 04:34 | #30 Hey, we're just having a little fun! These are all wish-list kinds of things. Plus, I'm pretty sure nobody mentioned editing RAW photos on the iPad. (Which, by the way, it could certainly do, based on an Aperture-like system of editing smaller preview JPEGs and then applying those edits on export to the raw files or copies thereof. That'd be totally fine if all you're doing is slider editing and cropping). Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1871 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||