Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 09 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 23:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Apple and Canon in bed together?

 
luciddreamer
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: NE Indiana
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:40 |  #16

Sorry, Apple buying Canon would lead to even greater price increases with lesser technology. But those cameras would be pretty and so trendy!


materialism ~
preoccupation with or emphasis on material objects, comforts, and considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual, intellectual, or cultural values.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Indecent ­ Exposure
Goldmember
Avatar
3,402 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:46 |  #17

luciddreamer wrote in post #11996107 (external link)
Sorry, Apple buying Canon would lead to even greater price increases with lesser technology. But those cameras would be pretty and so trendy!

Imagine the problems since we hold our cameras with our right hands!


- James -
www.feedthewant.com (external link)
500px (external link)
Gear List and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaron.dunlap
Goldmember
Avatar
1,805 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: USA
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:48 |  #18

Ah the infamous shutter attenuation. Hold it the wrong way and you can only sync at 1/20....


 Aaron

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luciddreamer
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: NE Indiana
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:52 |  #19

Indecent Exposure wrote in post #11996151 (external link)
Imagine the problems since we hold our cameras with our right hands!


When they got done it would be a touch screen to operate everything. You'd see it in the viewfinder and operate it with your nose.. No need for a right hand.


materialism ~
preoccupation with or emphasis on material objects, comforts, and considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual, intellectual, or cultural values.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:56 |  #20

Would the offspring of Apple and Canon be an Apple Cannon? They have Potato Launchers, so why not. pewpew


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beretta5spd
Member
44 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 10, 2011 15:16 |  #21

Indecent Exposure wrote in post #11994882 (external link)
QUOTED IMAGE

So you're saying there's a chance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


My 2011 Daily Photoblog (external link)
T1i, 18-55 kit lens, nifty 50, Sigma 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sth_
Senior Member
Avatar
811 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Europe
     
Mar 11, 2011 08:45 |  #22

cptrios wrote in post #11994165 (external link)
The great thing about Thunderbolt is that it's backwards-compatible (well not exactly backwards...side-backwards? Cross-backwards?) with USB. So you could have both in one port on the camera. I could be wrong there...but I'm fairly sure that'd be possible.

Not directly, but you could push pretty much anything over that port. If a company wants to build a Thunderbolt-to-USB-cable, it would certainly be possible (although the cable would need an embedded USB controller chip).

cptrios wrote in post #11993941 (external link)
One far-fetched but not entirely out-of-the-question thought is that Canon could be one of Apple's potential "huge acquisitions." Apple has an enormous, enormous amount of cash-on-hand, and there are weekly rumblings as to who the targets might be (from Kodak to Adobe to freaking Sony). I'd put the odds on this at around 100,000:1.

Not going to happen.


My completely outdated Flickr (external link) :: Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaron.dunlap
Goldmember
Avatar
1,805 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: USA
     
Mar 11, 2011 08:55 |  #23

More info on this today.... Canon is reportedly "excited" about thunderbolt. Imagine uploading footage into Final Cut at 10gigabits/sec... or for that matter, transferring photos off your camera that fast.

Methinks there will be some new CF/SD cards coming out soon (fyi, next gen SD cards are already in development that would support these transfer rates....)


 Aaron

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sth_
Senior Member
Avatar
811 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Europe
     
Mar 11, 2011 09:07 |  #24

Even current CF cards are capable of speeds around 3x as fast as USB2 can manage.
It's a shame that the biggest limitation in terms of transfer speed at the moment is the USB port.

Of course they could go towards USB3 (and I guess they will at some point), but I'd really still like to see an additional Thunderbold port since it's actually much more than just a faster alternative to USB.

I guess the professional video people would be glad to be able to stream 1080p to an external monitor, feed an external sound source to the camera and record high-bitrate video directly to an external storage device, all at the same time with just one cable going to the camera.


My completely outdated Flickr (external link) :: Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aaron.dunlap
Goldmember
Avatar
1,805 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: USA
     
Mar 11, 2011 10:09 |  #25

Apple is bypassing USB3. It will never be on any Apple product.


 Aaron

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sth_
Senior Member
Avatar
811 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Europe
     
Mar 11, 2011 10:18 |  #26

aaron.dunlap wrote in post #12001168 (external link)
Apple is bypassing USB3. It will never be on any Apple product.

I don't think so. The reason is more likely to be that USB3 isn't supported by any current Intel Chipset (which is what Apple uses in their machines). The only way to integrate USB3 into an Intel system is by using a seperate, third-party controller chip. And Apple just doesn't seem to care enough about USB3 to go down that route.

But I'm 100% sure that as soon as Intel supports USB3 natively, Apple machines will support it as well. Though that might not be before 2012 because Intel doesn't care much about USB3 either.


My completely outdated Flickr (external link) :: Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dman65
Junior Member
22 posts
Joined Jan 2002
     
Mar 11, 2011 22:00 |  #27

I sure hope Apple does not buy Canon. I would hate to switch to Nikon after all these years of using Canon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImCBParker
Senior Member
893 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 11, 2011 22:05 |  #28

dman65 wrote in post #12004847 (external link)
I sure hope Apple does not buy Canon. I would hate to switch to Nikon after all these years of using Canon.

I think your collection is safe.


Canon 5DIII, 7D, 40D, 8-14L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24L, 50L, 85 f1.8, 100L, 135L, 1.4 Extender, Tokina 16-28 f2.8, and too many lights and accessories to list.
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony_Stark
Shellhead
Avatar
4,287 posts
Likes: 350
Joined May 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Mar 13, 2011 01:09 |  #29

You people are taking this too far. The Macbook Air has been chirped for barely being able to handle Adobe programs, yet now the iPad can handle and EDIT RAW photos?

These rumors are being taken too far. As far as Canon and Apple relationship is concerned, the main thing that will arise from any partnership is going to start with including Thunderbolt ports on Canon DSLRs.


Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
EOS M | 22 f/2 STM

Website (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,745 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Mar 13, 2011 04:34 |  #30

Hey, we're just having a little fun! These are all wish-list kinds of things. Plus, I'm pretty sure nobody mentioned editing RAW photos on the iPad. (Which, by the way, it could certainly do, based on an Aperture-like system of editing smaller preview JPEGs and then applying those edits on export to the raw files or copies thereof. That'd be totally fine if all you're doing is slider editing and cropping).


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,377 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Apple and Canon in bed together?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1871 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.