Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Mar 2011 (Thursday) 13:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Enlarging problems

 
DVW
Member
Avatar
197 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
     
Mar 10, 2011 13:36 |  #1

I send photos for printing to either our local Meijer, Wal-mart, or Walgreen when it is just for myself. When ordering, I sometimes go into their poster menu just to see how large a size I could print. They give you a warning when the selected size is too large due to resolution.

Many times the warning will say to not go larger than 16x20 or sometimes 20x24. I understand it when I have cropped the heck out of an image, but I thought with the resolution of these cameras the prints can go much larger.

Do I need to resize the image in PS first? I'm just not understanding this at all.


Canon 7D gripped, XSI gripped, Canon 70-200L IS f4 , Canon 24-105L, 100mm Macro 2.8L, nifty fifty, 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS, 75-300 4-5.6, 430EX II,
1.4 teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4528
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 10, 2011 14:05 |  #2

Many commercial print making establishments have a guideline that there needs to be a minimum of 300 dpi in order have good quality output which will not be disappointing to the person ordering the print. Take your pixel dimension in one direction (e.g. width) and divide by the number of inches of print size in the same direction; for example, 2592 pixels / 16" = 162 dpi...too few for 300 dpi minimum, so resizing to 185% would be necessary in order to have 4800 pixels across the 16" print dimension.
Not all commercial printers insist on 300 dpi, some do, some don't.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DVW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
197 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
     
Mar 10, 2011 15:14 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #3

Thanks for the information Wilt. So, using your example, can I re-size in PS to 185% and not lose anything as far as resolution etc in the print?


Canon 7D gripped, XSI gripped, Canon 70-200L IS f4 , Canon 24-105L, 100mm Macro 2.8L, nifty fifty, 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS, 75-300 4-5.6, 430EX II,
1.4 teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 10, 2011 16:23 |  #4

Resizing to a larger size will add pixels by digitally "dithering" them -- spreading out detail over more pixels than your original. It is a normal part of printing, but the quality depends on the software doing it. It is frequently fine when done by the print provider (those who don't specifically require say 300 ppi or 360 ppi).

But, the advantage of doing it yourself is that you have both more control over the quality of your enlargement and also you can apply "output sharpening" that is "tuned in" to your actual print size.

So, there is some personal preference that can come into play as well as quality considerations that typically need to be adressed by contact with the print provider(s) and doing test runs trying different approaches.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4528
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 10, 2011 18:03 |  #5

DVW wrote in post #11996314 (external link)
Thanks for the information Wilt. So, using your example, can I re-size in PS to 185% and not lose anything as far as resolution etc in the print?

Personally I rather choose nice round numbers when resizing...for example starting with 2592 pixels, 150% = 3888, and 200% is 5184, but 160% = 4147.2 or 170% = 4406.4 ! So run it thru a calculator first, to see if the product is a nice integer.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HughR
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Mar 10, 2011 19:16 |  #6

If you consider the ability of the human eye to resolve detail, for a 12x18 inch print viewed at 18 inches, you need about 240 pixels per inch. The figure of 300 pixels per inch was created years ago by someone who did not know much about human vision. To resize, you can use Photoshop with bicubic smoother to enlarge the image appropriately.
For larger prints, you still need about 240 ppi if you want to view them at 18 inches. However, if you want to view them at a greater distance, you can get away with fewer ppi. For example, if you want a 16x24 inch print and want to optimize it for viewing at 24", you can use as low as 180 ppi. Whether the photo houses will be happy with this, I don't know, as I do all my own printing.


Hugh
Canon 60D, Original Digital Rebel (2003)
EFS 15-85mm IS USM, EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tokina 11-16mm
Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 430EX II,
Qbox 16 pro, Lastolite EZbox 24x24, Lumiquest Softbox III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JEC
Senior Member
Avatar
334 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Centerville, Ohio
     
Mar 10, 2011 20:01 |  #7

To preview how a file will print when enlarged in Photoshop, simply go to the image tab, select "image size", change the "document size" to whatever size you'd like to print at, then click "actual pixels"
Generally, if it looks good at that view, it will print well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DVW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
197 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
     
Mar 10, 2011 20:30 as a reply to  @ JEC's post |  #8

Thanks everyone, I'm starting to understand this a little more. Will have to experiment with it some this weekend.

What a great forum. Everyone is so helpful and willing to share their knowledge.


Canon 7D gripped, XSI gripped, Canon 70-200L IS f4 , Canon 24-105L, 100mm Macro 2.8L, nifty fifty, 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS, 75-300 4-5.6, 430EX II,
1.4 teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carshop
Goldmember
Avatar
1,846 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Mar 10, 2011 21:17 |  #9

JEC wrote in post #11997960 (external link)
To preview how a file will print when enlarged in Photoshop, simply go to the image tab, select "image size", change the "document size" to whatever size you'd like to print at, then click "actual pixels"
Generally, if it looks good at that view, it will print well.

I dont see the option, "actual pixels" in CS5


ShawnSmugmug (external link)/Flickr (external link)/LikeMyFacebook (external link)
Canon 70D Gripped|
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS|Canon 24-105|Canon 18-135
Canon 580 EX II|Sigma 18-50 2.8
Canon 55-250|Sigma 17-35 2.8| 2 Pocket Wizard II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m52
Goldmember
1,232 posts
Gallery: 53 photos
Likes: 350
Joined Jan 2009
Location: diamonhead ms
     
Mar 10, 2011 21:31 |  #10

look on the view menu or ctrl+1


Randy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carshop
Goldmember
Avatar
1,846 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Mar 10, 2011 21:32 |  #11

Thanks


ShawnSmugmug (external link)/Flickr (external link)/LikeMyFacebook (external link)
Canon 70D Gripped|
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS|Canon 24-105|Canon 18-135
Canon 580 EX II|Sigma 18-50 2.8
Canon 55-250|Sigma 17-35 2.8| 2 Pocket Wizard II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 10, 2011 23:08 |  #12

JEC wrote in post #11997960 (external link)
To preview how a file will print when enlarged in Photoshop, simply go to the image tab, select "image size", change the "document size" to whatever size you'd like to print at, then click "actual pixels"
Generally, if it looks good at that view, it will print well.

This isn't clear. I may be missing something in what you are suggesting. From what I know viewing "Actual Pixels" will show the image at "100% Zoom", whereas viewing the "Print Size" will show the "approximate" print size (when the image is set to dimensions in inches). There can be a huge difference between the two unless the print resolution is about 100 ppi...

Or you may be getting at something I'm not aware of?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,763 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Enlarging problems
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1473 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.