Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 10 Mar 2011 (Thursday) 23:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

CCD vs CMOS sensors which is better?

 
boerewors
Goldmember
Avatar
1,948 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: South African living in Indonesia
     
Mar 10, 2011 23:13 |  #1

Im a little confused about this one because both high end and entry level cameras tend to use CCD sensors but all the mid range stuff is CMOS. Why is this? If CCD is more expensive then why use them in entry level cameras like the sony A200?


The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
stax
Senior Member
Avatar
731 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Oakland
     
Mar 10, 2011 23:19 |  #2

The A200 uses an APS CCD sensor. I don't think that is the same thing as CCD sensor, but I admit that this topic is a bit out of my league.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/staxnet/ (external link)

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=865770

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Mar 10, 2011 23:20 |  #3

There is no better, there is only better for certain applications.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shoturtle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,187 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M.
     
Mar 10, 2011 23:21 |  #4

CMOS has matured, in the pass cdd was the more developed system so it was better for a while. But as CMOS improved, it has pass CDD in many respects. But most apparent is low light shooting. 1600iso is max for cdd, and it was noisy at 1600. Now with CMOS you have auto iso going to 3200 and 6400 is about the same level of noise where 1600 on cdd.

At lower iso, some say cdd is still nicer in resolving light but that is very hard to tell.

CDD still rules the pns market, but the backlit cmos is starting to gain traction. So the tiny 1/2.23 sensor might actually shoot well at 800iso in the future. Anything above 400iso on those sensor were pretty noise. All that 3200iso hype was just hype with the power shots. Only ones that could shoot well pass 400 iso were the larger g and s digicams with the 1/1.63 sensors.


Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
Canon 60D, T1i/500D, Eos 1, Eos 630, and Olympus epl-1. Current Canon Lenses ef 100 2.8, ef 85 1.8, ef 50 1.4, ef 28 1.8, ef 50 1.8,ef 28-135, ef 70-300, ef-s 18-55, ef-s 55-250, 500D close up lens. Current Olympus lenses oly m4/3 14-42, oly 4/3 35mm 3.5 macro with m4/3 adapter, panasonic 45-200, panasonic 20 1.7. And a Part time Pentax K-X shooter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xhack
Goldmember
Avatar
1,283 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Lothian
     
Mar 11, 2011 02:41 |  #5

I'm no expert on sensor technology, but the 4.1mp CCD sensor on my 1Dc has an intangible quality that is just . . . pleasing. Sharp and smooth is the best I can describe. Certainly a much more coherent image quality than the roughly contemporaneous 8mp CMOS 20D. That seems "gritty" by comparison. Of course, my 5D knocks both into a cocked hat!


~ Wallace
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shoturtle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,187 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M.
     
Mar 11, 2011 02:46 |  #6

20D was early cmos, there has been couple of generations since then. Case in point the 5d cmos, and the 7d cmos are way better then the 20d.


Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
Canon 60D, T1i/500D, Eos 1, Eos 630, and Olympus epl-1. Current Canon Lenses ef 100 2.8, ef 85 1.8, ef 50 1.4, ef 28 1.8, ef 50 1.8,ef 28-135, ef 70-300, ef-s 18-55, ef-s 55-250, 500D close up lens. Current Olympus lenses oly m4/3 14-42, oly 4/3 35mm 3.5 macro with m4/3 adapter, panasonic 45-200, panasonic 20 1.7. And a Part time Pentax K-X shooter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Mar 11, 2011 03:58 |  #7

-> Unless I am mistaken CCD has a higher energy consumption compared to CMOS.

At least according to Canon.


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Mar 11, 2011 04:56 |  #8

CCDs overall are probably the superior technology. Scientific imaging equipment, if I'm not mistaken, all use CCD. CMOS was adopted in DSLRs because it can move the data off the sensor faster and the sensor doesn't get as hot, and for whatever reason CCD sensors simply could not compete with CMOS at high ISO settings.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sp1207
Goldmember
1,835 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Right Behind You
     
Mar 11, 2011 05:18 |  #9

Yep, CCD has higher IQ, and initially higher read-off rates. For some reason high-ISO never developed for CCD the way it did with Cmos. You'll find a lot of super-pro studio cams that shoot at ISO 5 still (at least up until 2 years ago) used CCD for it's colors and 'smoother' quality, as did most government/scientific cams.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,461 views & 0 likes for this thread
CCD vs CMOS sensors which is better?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mimick
845 guests, 378 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.