Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Mar 2011 (Friday) 08:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anything I should know about a "Tamron 28-75 f2.8 Canon"

 
dparisoe
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Mar 11, 2011 08:14 |  #1

Well just as the title says I'm looking at a local sale of a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 for Canon and was wondering if there is anything I should be looking for. Do these lenses have any issues that I need to look for or ask about?

How do they compare to the 24-70L from Canon?

I would mostly use the lens for taking photos of my baby daughter and thought this might be a nice replacement for my kit lens.

Thanks for any comments.


Canon 6D Gripped | 24-105 L f/4 IS | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 11, 2011 08:20 |  #2

Great lens and a good value. I have not heard of any issues with it.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Japers
Member
Avatar
192 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Palmetto Point, FL
     
Mar 11, 2011 08:53 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #3

I've never used the 24-70L but all the reviews I read prior to purchasing my Tamron 28-75 said the two were equivalent. Having said that, I love my Tamron! :) It's tack sharp, well built, fast, and quiet. I've never had single problem with it. It's a great walk about lens and should be quite the improvement over your kit lens..

Look through: https://photography-on-the.net …ht=tamron+28-75mm+f%2F2.8


60D + Lenses = Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,335 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec
     
Mar 11, 2011 09:27 |  #4

I like mine and have never had a problem with it. The focal length is great for kid photography, and it produces super-sharp results. I think you'll enjoy it.


Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spacetime
Goldmember
Avatar
1,276 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Mar 11, 2011 10:05 |  #5

Using it on a crop the differences are somewhat marginal. I found the Canon to be sharper throughout the frame, have better AF and more contrast especially wide open. On FF the corner sharpness was more pronounced and the Canon seemed to focus even faster.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Mar 11, 2011 10:06 |  #6

I had one for about a year and from my experience:

Negatives

1.) Had to be stopped down to f/3.5 before sharpness was most apparent
2.) Focus was rather slow and has a tendency to hunt and miss focus in low light
3.) Cheaply built but for the price its about what you'd expect

Positives

1.) Really nice IQ once the lens was stopped down starting at f/3.5
2.) Very lite weight
3.) Multiple year warranty
4.) Affordable
5.) Comes with Lens Hood




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dparisoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 11:19 |  #7

Well I went ahead and picked it up yesterday, I have not had a chance to play with it much yet.

Thanks for all of the comments.


Canon 6D Gripped | 24-105 L f/4 IS | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,481 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1081
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Mar 16, 2011 13:09 |  #8

dparisoe wrote in post #12000602 (external link)
Well just as the title says I'm looking at a local sale of a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 for Canon and was wondering if there is anything I should be looking for. Do these lenses have any issues that I need to look for or ask about?

How do they compare to the 24-70L from Canon?

I would mostly use the lens for taking photos of my baby daughter and thought this might be a nice replacement for my kit lens.

Thanks for any comments.

Congrats on new lens!
I went for it for exactly same reason and it is very sharp at 2.8 for kids portraits.

First couple of months I struggle to get distance objects at focus under AF. It was also OOF at closer objects more often compare to kit lens. Now it is better. Don't know why.

For the price of the brick I have this lens and 70-200 F4 L which is perfect lens for kids photos as well.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SCOTTinNJ
Senior Member
Avatar
550 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Mar 16, 2011 16:13 |  #9

I just got one and find it pretty sharp to 65 or 70mm at 2.8. After that 65-70 point, it seems to be a bit softer unless stopped down. Have yet to confirm that with more testing.

Otherwise I'm pretty pleased with it.

Oh, and that's on FF. Haven't tested it enough with the cropper to comment.


Fuji X-T1

9 | 18 | 23 | 50
18-55 | 55-200
35 manual | 50 vintage

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfb318
Member
110 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: WPB, FL
     
Mar 16, 2011 20:40 as a reply to  @ SCOTTinNJ's post |  #10

Copy variation seems to be the plague of this lens. The first copy I had was terrible, the second one was so sharp I ended up selling my 24-70. The size and weight are about half of what the Canon is.:)


* 5DmkIII * 35mm 1.4L * 50mm 1.4 * 85mm 1.8 * 135mm 2L * 16-35mm II 2.8L * 24-105mm 4L IS * 70-200mm 4L IS * 580exii * Metz 70 MZ-5 *

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reprazent
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2009
     
Mar 16, 2011 20:59 |  #11

I was lucky when I bought mine used, since it was a sharp copy. Now I sorta regret selling it.


gearlist | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rweav72
Member
137 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Ky
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:36 |  #12

Love mine. Wouldn't trade it.


Ron Weaver
Canon 7D, 50D, 1D classic, Sigma 50 1.4, Canon 85 1.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8, 28-75 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 non IS
Nissan 622, Vivitar 383, Yongnuo 560 (3)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Mar 20, 2011 22:08 |  #13

Same here. I guess I got a good copy right off the bat because it is sharp all the way through, even wide open. I'll never sell mine!!


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Downs ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: New Orleans
     
Mar 21, 2011 01:50 |  #14

I had it before I went with the 24-70L 2.8, I enjoyed it, but in low light focus was horrible


| 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
Gear
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idsurfer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,255 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4378
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Boise, Idaho
     
Mar 21, 2011 07:21 |  #15

So, I am looking for this lens also...With the copy variation issues should I buy new in order to have the chance to return if not acceptable. Also, this may seem like a dumb question but, how do you know you have a bad copy? Will it just be soft despite your best efforts?


Cory
Sony ⍺6700 | Sony 10-20/4 | Sigma 56/1.4 | Tamron 17-70/2.8
flickr (external link)
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,196 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Anything I should know about a "Tamron 28-75 f2.8 Canon"
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1599 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.