Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 11 Mar 2011 (Friday) 15:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First attempt at city skyline photography

 
porky101
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Mar 11, 2011 15:31 |  #1

Hi Guys ,

Heres my first shot at city night time pictures.

Settings :

5 shots.
Shot in Raw
F10
Iso 100
20 Seconds exposure on tripod.

18-55MM lens IS off.

Focused on street lights at the bottom (1/3rd in)

Converted to B&W with photoshop

Is anything wrong with it? I think it came out pretty well:)


Go easy on me plz!

It may look like the top of the tower is chopped off , but it is NOT , I have a bit of space between is and the end of the frame.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrbubbles
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: NJ, USA
     
Mar 11, 2011 16:47 |  #2

This photo is very hard to make out. There is alot of negative space. The lights from the buildings look like randomly placed white dots. If there was a sky and was not black and white I think it would have more potential. Keep experimenting!


Gear List
Zenfolio (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Mar 11, 2011 16:49 as a reply to  @ mrbubbles's post |  #3

Why do you think it came out well? Asking because I want to know what you intended for us to see?


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 11, 2011 18:24 |  #4

Crank the exposure up about 2.5 stops and you can see the building outlines. I think it improves the image a lot. As it is all you see is little spots of light.

I'll bet the color is more interesting.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
squashed
Goldmember
Avatar
4,317 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 3201
Joined Oct 2006
Location: MidEastCali
     
Mar 11, 2011 18:26 |  #5

It looks terribly underexposed to me.


Done with Numbers. Own the X and the R
http://www.garyyoungph​otography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Mar 11, 2011 18:35 as a reply to  @ squashed's post |  #6

You'll get much better results shooting skylines while there's still some color in the sky...sorry to say, but this one isn't doing it.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 147
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Mar 11, 2011 18:40 |  #7

All of the above.
Black and white night time skylines work better when at least building outlines are recognizable.
Why are you shooting at F10? At this distance, DOF isn't an issue.
Why make your focus point the street light, when the buildings / buiding lights are the point of interest?
Why put the tallest structure that the absolute edge? Move it in to the left (one 3rd from the edge), and view that composition. The far left has nothing really in it, so losing that wouldnt be a great loss.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandytrouble
Member
104 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
Mar 11, 2011 18:48 as a reply to  @ kjonnnn's post |  #8

Color would make for a better picture here; you're picture partially covers a road, and over the course of the long exposure you would see a multitude of colors, hinting of a busy skyline


7D [EFS 17-55, EF 50 1.4, 70-200 IS II]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Mar 12, 2011 03:56 as a reply to  @ sandytrouble's post |  #9

Here is the colour version ,

Im not try anything really , I just wana a nice photo of a city skyline ,

I manually made the outline of the buildings darker and the sky darker , the original the sky is very bright and distracting , I will get the original for you guys its still on my camera , here is a Coloured version with some processing done to it.


I was told that to get the best DOF you should focus 1/3 of the way into a picture.

I could not center the tall building any more as there was a wall to my right.


Thx again :

Option 1) Original no processing:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



Option 2) Colour Burn.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



Option 3) Original converted to B&W :

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Option 4 ) Improved composition with original image :

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Option 5) Imporved composition with colour burn.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5093/5519571788_c603f179e4_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whoty
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1233
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Pensacola,FL
     
Mar 12, 2011 05:34 |  #10

I like option 3 best.


There is nothing worse than a brilliant image of a fuzzy concept. - Ansel Adams
Instagram (external link)
Facebook (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Mar 12, 2011 06:01 |  #11

porky101 wrote in post #12005670 (external link)
Here is the colour version ,

Im not try anything really , I just wana a nice photo of a city skyline ,

I manually made the outline of the buildings darker and the sky darker , the original the sky is very bright and distracting , I will get the original for you guys its still on my camera , here is a Coloured version with some processing done to it.


I was told that to get the best DOF you should focus 1/3 of the way into a picture.

I could not center the tall building any more as there was a wall to my right.


Thx again :

Ignore that advice...generally speaking, its nonsense. A lot depends on the focal length of the lens you're using, whether you're shooting vertical or horizontal, and whether or not you have a specific point of interest at the one-third line.

Night shots of city lights when its pitch black outside generally do not convey well...as stated earlier, try shooting a bit earlier (as in very late afternoon/early evening) to take advantage of the light...you'll get a much more compelling image.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Mar 12, 2011 10:50 |  #12

hmm , thanks...I wana to get one printed , maybe 4 Feet in size....they are panaroma made up of 6 pictures...which one should I print?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jffielde
Member
195 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Mar 12, 2011 11:35 |  #13

I prefer 1 and 3.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 12, 2011 12:48 |  #14

You really do need some light in the sky for this type of shot. Your images are still about 2 stops under exposed IMO. If you can't see the buildings against the sky the lights are still just dots of light.

Post up the 'original' with the brighter sky?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
porky101
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Mar 12, 2011 13:52 |  #15

Hi Titus ,

If you can't see the buildings against the sky the lights are still just dots of light.

Thanks for this info , I was exposing for the lights , not for the buildings...must I expose for the dark stuff rather and not the lights??

Ill post another photo shortly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,513 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
First attempt at city skyline photography
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1237 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.