Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 26 Sep 2005 (Monday) 13:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best Monitors

 
sagebrush
Member
158 posts
Joined Dec 2001
     
Sep 26, 2005 13:12 |  #1

What's the current thinking about the best monitor for graphic editing for PS use? Have the flat panel displays caught up to the CRT yet?
My CRT went south so I need a good replacement monitor.

Sagebrush




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griff2
Senior Member
Avatar
266 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, UK
     
Sep 26, 2005 13:18 |  #2

Some of the latest flat panels are quite good. I'm thinking of those from companies such as Iiyama and Eizo, although the latter are quite expensive. The advantage that the flat panels have over CRT is that you can use DVI which cuts out the digital to analogue process, something you have to do with CRT. Samsung also do quite good panels at a more reasonable price.

If price is a sticking point then Iiyama and Samsung also do good CRT's, although it's important to get one with a good high resolution at a high refresh rate, i.e. 80Hz.


griff2;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Sep 26, 2005 13:52 |  #3

Read this....
The VP191B is now discontinued, even though the new version was only a few months old, and arguably the best LCD monitor available. Luckily it has been replaced by the VP930B!


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Okiewan
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Dallas
     
Sep 26, 2005 15:33 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

VERY happy with the Dell 24" wide ... Screen to printer (Epson R2400) calibration is SPOT on.
(Mac G5)


1DsMkIII . 7D . 20D . , Lot's o' red-ringed Glass.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Sep 27, 2005 00:36 |  #5

Best is quite possibly Eizo and LaCie, though you pay a LOT of them.

I'd pick up an S-IPS panel if possible. Unfortunately, the newer panels are ALL TN+film, it seems like they don't care about image quality, and everyone who buys them just want faster response time.

You could always pick up another CRT.

Don't get me wrong, some TN+Film LCDs are very good. Just be sure to get a DVI one, if you have DVI out on your video card. There's a lot of research to be done.


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,201 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: L.A. formerly N Ireland
     
Sep 27, 2005 01:01 |  #6

how do the iMac G5 displays rate for photo editing? I'm considering getting the 20" model.


Pete
http://www.pbase.com/p​etejackson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nidz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,408 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2005
Location: VIC, Australia
     
Sep 27, 2005 01:42 |  #7

Samsung or Sony make good LCD Montors. If money is no object go with either of these. For image quality many brands are comparable. It's all about the MS seek time and the resolutions. You pay a lot more for a higher wide screen LCD monitor with a 6ms or less refresh rate. I think 3 is standard these days.


Stop or I'll Shoot!
10 Years on POTN Forums!
Canon 350D | 70-200f/4L | ef35-105mm | ef100-300mm | 50mm f1.8 etc..
Some of my Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Sep 27, 2005 13:58 as a reply to  @ Duder's post |  #8

Duder wrote:
how do the iMac G5 displays rate for photo editing? I'm considering getting the 20" model.

Check the review here:
http://www.behardware.​com …le-cinema-display-20.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,201 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: L.A. formerly N Ireland
     
Sep 27, 2005 14:20 as a reply to  @ chtgrubbs's post |  #9

chtgrubbs wrote:
Check the review here:
http://www.behardware.​com …le-cinema-display-20.html (external link)

yeah, i read that, but I'm talking about the imac G5. (external link)


Pete
http://www.pbase.com/p​etejackson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Sep 27, 2005 17:29 as a reply to  @ KevC's post |  #10

KevC wrote:
Best is quite possibly Eizo and LaCie, though you pay a LOT of them.

I'd pick up an S-IPS panel if possible. Unfortunately, the newer panels are ALL TN+film, it seems like they don't care about image quality, and everyone who buys them just want faster response time.

You could always pick up another CRT.

Don't get me wrong, some TN+Film LCDs are very good. Just be sure to get a DVI one, if you have DVI out on your video card. There's a lot of research to be done.

The Viewsonic VP191B/VP930B I mention above is actually an (m)VA panel, with true 8 bit colour. Even though it's marked as 8ms response, it's actually faster than most so-called 4ms TN panels because it never slows beyond 16ms (which equals 60hz refresh). The so-called 4ms panels often hit speeds as low as 30ms in certain conditions.

The colour reproduction of the MVA panel in the VP191B and VP930B match and sometimes exceed even the 10bit colour of some IPS panels, and definately outperform the IPS panels in most other areas, such as movie playback, and definately gaming.

Nidz wrote:
Samsung or Sony make good LCD Montors. If money is no object go with either of these. For image quality many brands are comparable. It's all about the MS seek time and the resolutions. You pay a lot more for a higher wide screen LCD monitor with a 6ms or less refresh rate. I think 3 is standard these days.

As mentioned above, the ms response time means very little, especially for a photographer.
The so-called fast TN panels have relatively poor contrast, viewing angles, and colour reproduction (they are only 6 bit), and even the 8ms VP930B (which is a real 8 bit MVA panel) is overall faster for games than the "4ms" TN panels, and offers almost perfect colour reproduction.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Oct 19, 2005 09:46 as a reply to  @ drisley's post |  #11

If you want the "best" LCD monitor, check out this one:
ViewSonic VP2290b (Black) 22.2" LCD Monitor

Retails for about $7500 USD


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
Avatar
2,622 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: London UK
     
Oct 19, 2005 09:54 as a reply to  @ SWPhotoImaging's post |  #12

I have the 23" Apple CinemaDisplay and am very happy with it.

I do think that it's what you are used to and consistency that are important. I only ever look at the apple display and it is calibrated. I adjust to it's colour rendition. It is repeatable and I know what to expect.

If you value your desk space, then an lcd from a reputable manufacturer is a good choice.

Just allow for a hardware calibrator and you will be fine.

Graham


.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Hardcard
Senior Member
578 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Oct 19, 2005 19:45 as a reply to  @ blue_max's post |  #13

What about CRTs? While I would love a high-quality LCD, I can't afford one now. I am in the market for a good 19-inch or (better) 21-inch CRT in the $200 to $250 (used) price. Maybe one that goes for or went for $350 to $500 new.

It doesn't have to be a super "Professional with one- million adjustments", just one that would let me work in 1600 x 1200 with reasonably accurate geometry and the ability to do color management on it.

No one seems to talk about CRTs anymore, it is very difficult to find info on CRT monitors these days. The few reviews I do find are for models that no one seems to be selling.:confused: :mad: :mad:

Is there anyone using a readily-available CRT that they can recommend?


Sweet new gear for a photogenic new year!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,833 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Best Monitors
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1209 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.