Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 Mar 2011 (Saturday) 19:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Correct flash exposure without a lightmeter?

 
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:02 |  #16

TMR Design wrote in post #12012859 (external link)
I'm saying that many people don't understand that, shoot with all kinds of in-camera adjustments, and are perpetually fooled because they are using the histogram or looking at a shot and thinking it's too bright or dark, only to make a change in exposure and find out it made a mess out of things when they finally look at the raw image.


:lol: bw!


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:02 |  #17

drdiesel1 wrote in post #12012843 (external link)
OK, so what are you saying ???

I think he's agreeing with you, but I don't want speak for him:rolleyes:

I concur with what you're saying, neutral with -4 contrast is what I use. I've also got DPP highlight alert set up to match what the camera is: 251. This works on my 40D, 7D and 5DII.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:04 |  #18

windpig wrote in post #12012874 (external link)
I think he's agreeing with you. I concur with what you're saying, neutral with -4 contrast is what I use. I've also got DPP highlight alert set up to match what the camera is: 251. This works on my 40D, 7D and 5DII.


DPP is the only software I know of that will import internal camera settings and use them to render the final imported image ;)


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:06 |  #19

windpig wrote in post #12012874 (external link)
I think he's agreeing with you, but I don't want speak for him:rolleyes:

I concur with what you're saying, neutral with -4 contrast is what I use. I've also got DPP highlight alert set up to match what the camera is: 251. This works on my 40D, 7D and 5DII.

I didn't realize my post was confusing. Yes, I agreed with him, and the fact that that's how it should be.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:08 |  #20

TMR Design wrote in post #12012898 (external link)
I didn't realize my post was confusing. Yes, I agreed with him, and the fact that that's how it should be.

More vague for me, than confusing ;)


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:37 |  #21

drdiesel1 wrote in post #12012888 (external link)
DPP is the only software I know of that will import internal camera settings and use them to render the final imported image ;)

I was able to get my picture style set up by having DPP set up to match the blinkies and seeing if in fact my histogram and LCD were giving me what the RAW files show when DPP opened them.

I know that ACR at least will get the best captured data I can provide it, what it does from there depends on my willingness to go dweeb the ACR input settings. But you knew that anyway:cool:

I hope I'm not being obtuse:rolleyes:


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BestVisuals
Senior Member
763 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:54 as a reply to  @ windpig's post |  #22

If a light meter isn't calibrated, it isn't much use. I agree that you need to calibrate any light meter to your grey card. It's easy as pie to do. Use your meter on incident mode, write down the exposure. Take a photo at the exact distance of the light meter of a certified grey card using the exposure you wrote down (use Manual exposure).

Take this image on your computer and use the eyedropper tool in a photo editor. The closer to 128/128/128 you are, the more accurate your meter and/or camera combination is.

Assuming you do that, however, there is a very quick way to determine exposure. Shoot a test photo using whatever metering method you use. If your camera shows the "blinkies" on any important area you want detail on, you must reduce exposure until the "blinkies" goes away. Using the blinkies method makes sure you haven't set something wrong or made a mistake - it's the absolute final test.


Canon 5D MK II, 24-105 L, Sigma 16mm fisheye

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 17:56 |  #23

windpig wrote in post #12013035 (external link)
I was able to get my picture style set up by having DPP set up to match the blinkies and seeing if in fact my histogram and LCD were giving me what the RAW files show when DPP opened them.

I know that ACR at least will get the best captured data I can provide it, what it does from there depends on my willingness to go dweeb the ACR input settings. But you knew that anyway:cool:

I hope I'm not being obtuse:rolleyes:

DPP will import the in-camera settings and use them to render the imported file. It will have whatever sharpness, contrast, picture style settings used in-camera when it opens the file.

ACR will ignore those settings when it imports the files. I have my ACR default settings setup to use my Color Checker Passport profile from the DNG file I created for each camera.


Now shine my shoes :p I'm not being Obtuse am I :lol:


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:02 |  #24

drdiesel1 wrote in post #12013124 (external link)
DPP will import the in-camera settings and use them to render the imported file. It will have whatever sharpness, contrast, picture style settings used in-camera when it opens the file.

ACR will ignore those settings when it imports the files. I have my ACR default settings setup to use my Color Checker Passport profile from the DNG file I created for each camera.


Now shine my shoes :p I'm not being Obtuse am I :lol:

I may digress here, but which Passport profile do you use as a default?
BTW, I don't shine shoes anymore, not since Sunday school when I was a kid.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:08 |  #25

BestVisuals wrote in post #12013112 (external link)
If a light meter isn't calibrated, it isn't much use. I agree that you need to calibrate any light meter to your grey card. It's easy as pie to do. Use your meter on incident mode, write down the exposure. Take a photo at the exact distance of the light meter of a certified grey card using the exposure you wrote down (use Manual exposure).

Take this image on your computer and use the eyedropper tool in a photo editor. The closer to 128/128/128 you are, the more accurate your meter and/or camera combination is.

Assuming you do that, however, there is a very quick way to determine exposure. Shoot a test photo using whatever metering method you use. If your camera shows the "blinkies" on any important area you want detail on, you must reduce exposure until the "blinkies" goes away. Using the blinkies method makes sure you haven't set something wrong or made a mistake - it's the absolute final test.

I use both. The EV target works great for quick outdoor EV evaluations.
The calibrated LM is used for studio work.


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:12 |  #26

windpig wrote in post #12013160 (external link)
I may digress here, but which Passport profile do you use as a default?
BTW, I don't shine shoes anymore, not since Sunday school when I was a kid.


The daylight profile. I haven't made the Dual or a flash profile yet. Most of my work is outside, so it's my general/default setting.

I was referring to the Wardens line in the movie "Shawshank Redemption"


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:15 |  #27

drdiesel1 wrote in post #12013208 (external link)
The daylight profile. I haven't made the Dual or a flash profile yet. Most of my work is outside, so it's my general/default setting.

I was referring to the Wardens line in the movie "Shawshank Redemption"

That's the reason I threw out the obtuse comment. What a great scene in a great movie.

Thanks for the info on the profile default, I'll need to go dweeb my CS4 when I get a chance.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:18 |  #28

windpig wrote in post #12013231 (external link)
That's the reason I threw out the obtuse comment. What a great scene in a great movie.

Thanks for the info on the profile default, I'll need to go dweeb my CS4 when I get a chance.


:lol: Dweeb isn't a term I've heard in a while. Yep, the ShawShank was a great movie.

Do you have the latest software from X-Rite to make the dual profiles as well as controlling the profiles you have ?

When you open ACR and select the cameras profile, go to the flyout menu and set it to the default setting near the bottom of the menu.

I have saturation, clarity, and WB defaults set for each camera. I also have default sharpening and noise reduction set. Everything I need to adjust has been set to my default spec as the image is imported and then I work each file from there.
It's a lot quicker than doing each file from zero.


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:29 |  #29

drdiesel1 wrote in post #12013244 (external link)
:lol: Dweeb isn't a term I've heard in a while. Yep, the ShawShank was a great movie.

Do you have the latest software from X-Rite to make the dual profiles as well as controlling the profiles you have ?

When you open ACR and select the cameras profile, go to the flyout menu and set it to the default setting near the bottom of the menu.

I have saturation, clarity, and WB defaults set for each camera. I also have default sharpening and noise reduction set. Everything I need to adjust has been set to my default spec as the image is imported and then I work each file from there.
It's a lot quicker than doing each file from zero.

I've got 1.0.2, I've not look for a new version for a while, but will check it out this afternoon along with your directions.

As far as dweebing, it was a term we used all the time when windsurfing. Lots of adjusting to get things dialed in, especially new gear, but also when sailing at a new venue with different wind and wave conditions.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drdiesel1
Goldmember
Avatar
4,043 posts
Gallery: 86 photos
Likes: 1699
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Mar 13, 2011 18:48 |  #30

windpig wrote in post #12013295 (external link)
I've got 1.0.2, I've not look for a new version for a while, but will check it out this afternoon along with your directions.

As far as dweebing, it was a term we used all the time when windsurfing. Lots of adjusting to get things dialed in, especially new gear, but also when sailing at a new venue with different wind and wave conditions.


Here's where you'll find it. It's second from the bottom of the menu.

I suggest you preset everything you want, then create the default. It's as simple as "save new camera raw default"


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
Canon 5DMKIII - Canon 24-105F/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,563 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Correct flash exposure without a lightmeter?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2913 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.