Here is the link to my newest time-lapse: LINK![]()
Taken on the 10th of March
ArcticShooter Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Mar 13, 2011 13:23 | #1 |
thejimmy Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 33 Joined Dec 2009 Location: west coast of Florida More info | Mar 13, 2011 14:13 | #2 ArcticShooter wrote in post #12011952 Here is the link to my newest time-lapse: LINK Taken on the 10th of March Excellent work, can you film this in 3D IMAX!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 13, 2011 22:28 | #4 Wow ! Great show ArcticShooter ! How many frames did you have to take for this ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ArcticShooter THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Mar 14, 2011 13:05 | #5 the jimmy wrote in post #12012136 Excellent work, can you film this in 3D IMAX! Thank you. Sure, just send me a capable camera and I will give it a try L.J.G. wrote in post #12012299 Wow, amazing. Thank you Celestron wrote in post #12014617 Wow ! Great show ArcticShooter ! How many frames did you have to take for this ? This is roughly 600 images. Helge
LOG IN TO REPLY |
syed.ammar Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Saudi Arabia More info | Mar 14, 2011 17:28 | #6 WOW!! datss sooo ammazing !! Equipment: Canon 450D+18-55mm+55+250mm+50mm/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
folville Goldmember 1,022 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2006 Location: MN More info | Mar 15, 2011 18:32 | #7 That's really impressive how fluid and dynamic the whole thing is - I had no idea. Thanks for sharing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Mar 15, 2011 18:49 | #8 Wow. Looks hard to get tired of. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | Mar 16, 2011 05:31 | #9 Awesome Helge. I see you metioned how many frames, but I'm curious over what sort of time period it was. Never having seen an aurora, I don't have a feel for how much and how quickly they move. "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ArcticShooter THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Mar 17, 2011 12:14 | #10 syed.ammar wrote in post #12019672 WOW!! datss sooo ammazing !! Thank you folville wrote in post #12027220 That's really impressive how fluid and dynamic the whole thing is - I had no idea. Thanks for sharing. ![]() Thank you S.Horton wrote in post #12027325 Wow. Looks hard to get tired of. I know, tell me about it troypiggo wrote in post #12029845 Awesome Helge. I see you metioned how many frames, but I'm curious over what sort of time period it was. Never having seen an aurora, I don't have a feel for how much and how quickly they move. Some of the slow moving ones last for up to 5 minutes while the really fast can be over in 1 minute or so Helge
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DragonSpeed Goldmember More info | Mar 17, 2011 12:30 | #11 ArcticShooter wrote in post #12038251 Thank you Thank you ![]() I know, tell me about it ![]() Some of the slow moving ones last for up to 5 minutes while the really fast can be over in 1 minute or so I have a friend heading up to Yellowknife to shoot the Aurora in April...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ArcticShooter THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Mar 17, 2011 13:03 | #12 DragonSpeed wrote in post #12038361 I have a friend heading up to Yellowknife to shoot the Aurora in April... A couple of q's 1) what frequency did you shoot these frames at? 2) what exposure settings work best for Auroras? Thanks! That is almost an impossible question to answer! Helge
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DragonSpeed Goldmember More info | Mar 17, 2011 14:07 | #13 ArcticShooter wrote in post #12038575 That is almost an impossible question to answer! I shoot continues mode so when one exp is done it's right on to a new one. Think most of these where at 2s or faster. I varied between the 24mm and the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 What camera and lens is he going to be using? On my 5DmkII with the 24mm f/1.4@1.4 I have been successful down to 0.3s, it depends on how dark it is. And ISO from 1250 and up to 4000 But on iso4000 I go down to sRAW1 (9.9M) If you have the full moon behind you it can be really fast, down to 0.3s at iso 1600. So there is only one solution, trial and errors, sorry But since I have done this so many years I am able to get it correct in 1 or 2 tries Thank you for the information. I don't know what he's got, other than the fact that the camera manufacturer starts with and ends with an "N"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ArcticShooter THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,828 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Arctic Norway (Tromsø) More info | Mar 18, 2011 00:51 | #14 DragonSpeed wrote in post #12038949 Thank you for the information. I don't know what he's got, other than the fact that the camera manufacturer starts with and ends with an "N" I'll pass the shutter info on to him though.Cheers! Oops, those cameras have a total different setting! Helge
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1493 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||