Falkon
there use to be a device that did that, shot at right angles it screwed onto a lens the mirror was coated on the outer serface to inprove the shot.
Rob.
GyRob Cream of the Crop 10,206 posts Likes: 1413 Joined Feb 2005 Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK. More info | Sep 30, 2005 15:54 | #16 Falkon "The LensMaster Gimbal"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Salleke Goldmember 2,201 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Belgium More info | Falkon wrote: That is what I was thinking about. When you see a person that you want a photo of and you ask first then they will be hamming it up for the camera. Candid shots appear more realistic and often look better. Maybe I will mount a mirror to the front of my lens so I will appear to be taking a photo in one direction when I wan really taking one in another. ![]() Falkon - Here is a link for the right angle lens that you mean:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hell, if you were going to go to that length, might as well just use a 600mm lens and sit on a rooftop! Canon 40D, Canon 70-200mm 2.8 L, Canon 50mm 1.4, Sigma 20mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shutter22 I'm very sensitive 1,379 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: The Only Town in Pennsylvania, fools. More info | Oct 01, 2005 21:09 | #19 It doesn't help that I'm a teenager and people don't seem to take me seriously. Danielle
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Oct 02, 2005 04:05 | #20 I let people know I'm there and try to make myself noticable as to not worry anyone. If someone approaches me, I explain to them. Asking someone first, at usually pulls away its naturalness, so I ask afterwards. At least that's how I do it for PJ stuff. And for kids, I always offer to the parents if they want copies. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neil_r Cream of the Proverbial Crop Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006 18,065 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jan 2003 Location: The middle of the UK More info | craigrdunn wrote: This hasn't been helped by the stupid mayor of London Mr. Livingston proposing 'No photo' areas in the middle of London, including trafalgar square, Commercial photography is currently not allowed in Trafalgar Square or Parliament Square, or any of the Royal parks (without a permit, which costs an arm and a leg) There is no restriction on tourist type photography or pictures that will no be used for profit or in any other business context. Neil - © NHR Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aylwin Senior Member 564 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Tampere, Finland More info | Oct 02, 2005 05:21 | #22 I like Salleke's smile, point to the person and point to the camera suggestion. It's a friendly approach without being too confrontational or up close and personal. Aylwin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Oct 02, 2005 05:32 | #23 I see it this way. If you are honest and up front and willing to give your information out, you generally wouldn't be someone who is trying to hide something. Maybe that's just me as far as photographing anyone young. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Actionphotog Senior Member 654 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Luray VA More info | Oct 02, 2005 09:30 | #24 For a photographer not selling their work Graeme Davies
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveParr should have taken his own advice 6,593 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Permanent banquietman wrote: This is indeed an often-discussed subject. A couple of law firms have put together a list of guuidelines: For Americans: http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm For those in the UK: http://www.sirimo.co.uk/ukpr.php Both sites have quick reference sheets/pamphlets you can print and carry with you, to hand out to those concerned, or heaven forbid, those in authority... I've never looked at the second one, but there was some rather heated discussion concerning the first one in another thread some time back. I've got some issues with it. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
waldograce Goldmember 1,680 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Bristol, VA More info | kenyc wrote: So here's my musing on this. Why is it any different for a news photo than one sold to a magazine. The law is that if the photo is taken for the newspaper or TV (news) etc. then a release is not required, but if it is taken by the photographer to sell to mags or to see as prints or for stock sales then a release is required. Is not the news photo sold to the newspaper, isn't money being made from the use of the photo regardless of whether it's "news" or not. I'm beginning to not see a differenece. Why would one case require protection for the subject and not another? KAC You forgot the distinction that it has to be a "newsworthy" event for the paper... I can't create beauty with my camera, I can only capture it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigJohn Senior Member 471 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Janesville, Wisconsin More info | Oct 25, 2005 13:39 | #27 I am purely an amatuer at this point, but slowly working my way into marketing and selling some photos. I love taking candids of people as well as semi-posed shots using something like: "Hey, I love your mohawk! Can I get a quick picture of you?" And as stated above, 99% of the time people will smile and say "sure!" come see my photos at www.cmuetz.smugmug.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Salleke Goldmember 2,201 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Belgium More info | Big John wrote: I am purely an amatuer at this point, but slowly working my way into marketing and selling some photos. I love taking candids of people as well as semi-posed shots using something like: "Hey, I love your mohawk! Can I get a quick picture of you?" And as stated above, 99% of the time people will smile and say "sure!" Sometimes I just go right up to them and chat them up for a bit if there is something unusual going on and this breaks the ice. They see me walking around with a camera and big white lens taking pictures of whatever is going on, and I am "pegged" as a photographer. I try to get people talking about themselves and build rapport so when the question "Can I take your picture?" is asked, it's something they almost expect. I also carry some business cards with my name, my website and an e-mail address that they can contact me if they want some free prints or just an e-mail of the photos. If I think it might be a particularly nice shot I will say "I think I have some great photos of you! I'd like to put them on my online gallery. Check out my work, and if you don't want to be on my website, just shoot me an e-mail and I will pull your photos off right away." I have not had a single person e-mail me yet! I think some of them like the idea of being in a gallery. IMHO it all comes down to be polite and friendly with people and nobody will have problems that we take pictures ... good luck to all of us ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
berto Senior Member 725 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2004 Location: Guam More info | Oct 26, 2005 01:07 | #29 well, mypersonal rule is if i wantto take pictures of strangers. i would ask first or, i would take the picture and show them. if they approve i keep it and email them a copy if not then its deleted. Canon 40D, 50Dx2, e-pl1, 580ex, 580ex2 with special attachment...me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YosemiteJunkie Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Here's a thought. How about an official "P.O.T.N. PRESS" badge we could hang on our pocket or even the old fashion hang it on the hat Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1584 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||