Pretty Impressive: Canon 5D Mark II vs Fujifilm X100 vs Leica X1 Test

Canon 5D Mark II vs Fujifilm X100 vs Leica X1 Test

Wow! i'm impressed with the ISO & Lens sharpness of the X100 compared to the Canon 5d Mark II to the Leica X1.

(side note = too bad the 35 f/2 was on the 5DII. would have loved to see the difference with the 35L mounted)

Thoughts?

Do you really think its a fair comparison between a Canon FF DSLR against 2 point and shoot cameras? I really think the Leica did pretty good against them all.

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick

It's not clear which camera you are "wowing" about.

Saint728 wrote in post #12015757
Do you really think its a fair comparison between a Canon FF DSLR against 2 point and shoot cameras? I really think the Leica did pretty good against them all.

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick

pknight wrote in post #12016080
It's not clear which camera you are "wowing" about.

LOL. I should have noted first that I was comparing the X100 to the other cameras.

It's just nice to see a comparison from a 5DII user perspective. It's nice to see that if I were to acquire the X100, i wouldn't be losing that much IQ.

Marloon wrote in post #12015569
Canon 5D Mark II vs Fujifilm X100 vs Leica X1 Test

Wow! i'm impressed with the ISO & Lens sharpness of the X100 compared to the Canon 5d Mark II to the Leica X1.

(side note = too bad the 35 f/2 was on the 5DII. would have loved to see the difference with the 35L mounted)

Thoughts?

This site proving few things for me:

All three cameras are exelent choice for taking pictures and post them at 400x300 pixels size.

5D MKII still needs sensor to be cleaned.

My 500D costs probably two times less compare to x100 and providing better pictures.