Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 14 Mar 2011 (Monday) 10:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hailey -- first shoot with new lights.

 
sWampy
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:01 |  #1

Any feedback would be awesome.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: script
IMAGE: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_GxSAe6agPJo/TX4rRzXhd4I/AAAAAAABCA0/j4vxSXqiAk8/s640/IMG_4768.jpg

IMAGE: https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/_GxSAe6agPJo/TX4rUVFc_tI/AAAAAAABCA8/39pw2pdG7yA/s640/IMG_4769.jpg
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: script

400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:07 |  #2

Looks a touch underexposed and your background looks very underexposed. Did you use a meter?

Try and get that background lit evenly. If you were going for white, it should be all white. If you were going for gray, it should be all gray. Right now, it looks like you just didnt light it properly.

What's the stuff in the background in the bottom of 2?

Maybe pull back the skin work a little as well. Pretty model; keep shooting her.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:19 |  #3

Not for these 2, had metered for some with her laying on the floor, rolling around on the white sheet you still see on the floor on the bottom of shoot 2.

It's a 9x12 room with 8 foot ceilings, getting the light constant on the background is a big challenge.

She was having a major bad breakout day, but yeah, I agree I think sometimes less is more.


400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:39 |  #4

yeah the skin blur is just way too strong. If you are going to use a white drop you really have to make it white. Its tough to do sometimes with one background light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:49 |  #5

I'll pull the original when I get home, the originals were brighter, I cranked the exposure down a little, then did a white vignette in light room. The solid stark white background caused her white shirt to get a little lost in the background.


400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuraz
Senior Member
624 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
     
Mar 14, 2011 16:12 |  #6

Please remove the white vignette in number 2. It doesnt do well on her jeans. I would say loose it all the way in both but thats just my opnion of white vignetting in this case.

If you were going for the white background look and thats what you really want to do then listen to the above and keep working with it. If not then try moving around (even though the room isnt huge) and getting different angles (low from the left 45 degrees with camera close to the floor, same for the right, shoot 90 degrees from both directions) while keeping the light stationary. Then try moving the light around while you stay at the same angle. Its a few things you can do with a small room and still be creative.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 14, 2011 19:59 |  #7

I just really didn't like how the shirt got lost in the background.

IMAGE: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_GxSAe6agPJo/TX65f0pFi4I/AAAAAAABCCU/7HXqpVUpSAY/s640/IMG_4768.jpg

400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 21:49 |  #8

Oh this version is so much better than the previous posts. The shirt doesnt fade into the background on my monitor and that terrible white vignette is gone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 14, 2011 22:13 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #9

I used burn in lr to darken the right shoulder a little. I tried to get out my spyder 2 express to calibrate my monitor again to see if it's off, and I can't find the serial number. ;-( I have to buy a monitor calibration thing from someone else, having to find the serial number to use a piece of hardware really bugs me, they should at least give you basic function with out a serial number, and make you put in a serial number if you wanted the features they charge extra for. grr.


400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CosmoKid
Goldmember
Avatar
4,235 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2009
Location: NJ
     
Mar 15, 2011 08:23 |  #10

MUCH better than the first 2. the shirt absolutely does not get lost.

if you meter your subject and background properly, you will always be able to differentiate a white subject on a white background.


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.com (external link) - Portfolio (external link)

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Page (external link) -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 15, 2011 09:30 |  #11

CosmoKid wrote in post #12023531 (external link)
MUCH better than the first 2. the shirt absolutely does not get lost.

if you meter your subject and background properly, you will always be able to differentiate a white subject on a white background.

I'm still learning, studio lights are new to me.


400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12Rock
Senior Member
691 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2010
     
Mar 15, 2011 09:35 |  #12

To much blur it seems , I would have went with a darker backround for contrast




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Benji
Goldmember
2,220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 27
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North east Indiana
     
Mar 15, 2011 09:57 |  #13

Lots and lots of things going on here. A beautiful young lady. Focus is nice. The clothing, the prop and the background are all in the same key, nice!

Problems. WB is off. Shoot in Raw, shoot a gray card first. WB problems will then no longer be problems. Pose is quite static but I use it on occasion myself. :-) The kicker is nice and soft (ambient light from a window I assume) but it is blue and has encroached onto the side of her nose. Main light was too close to the camera and the image is underexposed by one stop. To be real picky, the necklace is crooked and long sleeves keeps our eyes off her face and on her arms.

Benji




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sWampy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi
     
Mar 15, 2011 10:02 |  #14

12Rock wrote in post #12023900 (external link)
To much blur it seems , I would have went with a darker backround for contrast

Well I really wasn't paying much attention to the background when taking this, I was trying to see what my new 6' soft box, and 48' umbrella on the main light did to light the subject.


400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphot​os.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/melodysphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kuraz
Senior Member
624 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
     
Mar 15, 2011 15:18 |  #15

gonzogolf wrote in post #12021467 (external link)
Oh this version is so much better than the previous posts. The shirt doesnt fade into the background on my monitor and that terrible white vignette is gone.

+1 on the vignetting. try cooling her down a little by adjusting the WB. Seems a little warm for my taste. Keep shooting tho. You can always do PP to this later :cool:


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,162 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Hailey -- first shoot with new lights.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1857 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.