Any feedback would be awesome.
![]() | Content warning: script |
![]() | Content warning: script |
sWampy Senior Member 331 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Mississippi More info | Mar 14, 2011 10:01 | #1 Any feedback would be awesome.
400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CosmoKid Goldmember 4,235 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2009 Location: NJ More info | Mar 14, 2011 10:07 | #2 Looks a touch underexposed and your background looks very underexposed. Did you use a meter? Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2011 10:19 | #3 Not for these 2, had metered for some with her laying on the floor, rolling around on the white sheet you still see on the floor on the bottom of shoot 2. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Mar 14, 2011 10:39 | #4 yeah the skin blur is just way too strong. If you are going to use a white drop you really have to make it white. Its tough to do sometimes with one background light.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2011 10:49 | #5 I'll pull the original when I get home, the originals were brighter, I cranked the exposure down a little, then did a white vignette in light room. The solid stark white background caused her white shirt to get a little lost in the background. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuraz Senior Member 624 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Louisiana More info | Mar 14, 2011 16:12 | #6 Please remove the white vignette in number 2. It doesnt do well on her jeans. I would say loose it all the way in both but thats just my opnion of white vignetting in this case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 14, 2011 19:59 | #7 I just really didn't like how the shirt got lost in the background. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Mar 14, 2011 21:49 | #8 Oh this version is so much better than the previous posts. The shirt doesnt fade into the background on my monitor and that terrible white vignette is gone.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I used burn in lr to darken the right shoulder a little. I tried to get out my spyder 2 express to calibrate my monitor again to see if it's off, and I can't find the serial number. ;-( I have to buy a monitor calibration thing from someone else, having to find the serial number to use a piece of hardware really bugs me, they should at least give you basic function with out a serial number, and make you put in a serial number if you wanted the features they charge extra for. grr. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CosmoKid Goldmember 4,235 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2009 Location: NJ More info | Mar 15, 2011 08:23 | #10 MUCH better than the first 2. the shirt absolutely does not get lost. Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2011 09:30 | #11 CosmoKid wrote in post #12023531 MUCH better than the first 2. the shirt absolutely does not get lost. if you meter your subject and background properly, you will always be able to differentiate a white subject on a white background. I'm still learning, studio lights are new to me. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2011 09:35 | #12 To much blur it seems , I would have went with a darker backround for contrast
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2011 09:57 | #13 Lots and lots of things going on here. A beautiful young lady. Focus is nice. The clothing, the prop and the background are all in the same key, nice!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 15, 2011 10:02 | #14 12Rock wrote in post #12023900 To much blur it seems , I would have went with a darker backround for contrast Well I really wasn't paying much attention to the background when taking this, I was trying to see what my new 6' soft box, and 48' umbrella on the main light did to light the subject. 400D, 50D, 7D, 550ex, 420ex, 380ex, 50mm f/1.4, 17-85 EFS, 70-200 L f/2.8, 28-70 L f/2.8, 100-400L http://www.melodysphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuraz Senior Member 624 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Louisiana More info | Mar 15, 2011 15:18 | #15 gonzogolf wrote in post #12021467 Oh this version is so much better than the previous posts. The shirt doesnt fade into the background on my monitor and that terrible white vignette is gone. +1 on the vignetting. try cooling her down a little by adjusting the WB. Seems a little warm for my taste. Keep shooting tho. You can always do PP to this later
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1857 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||