Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 14 Mar 2011 (Monday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Suggestions for blur on gymnastics pictures

 
Doemasters
Member
163 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 301
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:20 |  #1

I went and shot a few pictures this past friday evening at an alabama gymnastics meet but i ended up getting some blur in the shots, i was shooting across the gym floor in my seats so i am hoping that is the main problem. The other problem is they do not allow a lens over 6 inches so i took a canon 2.8 200mm prime lens. Anyway what would you suggest. Higher iso? I think all of my image info should be in the pictures

IMAGE: http://doemasters.smugmug.com/RollTideBama/Misc/Alabama-Gymnastics/IMG1447/1213760681_yNaFB-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://doemasters.smugmug.com/RollTideBama/Misc/Alabama-Gymnastics/IMG1538/1213791019_EGEk8-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://doemasters.smugmug.com/RollTideBama/Misc/Alabama-Gymnastics/IMG1558/1213796895_gF4Qp-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://doemasters.smugmug.com/RollTideBama/Misc/Alabama-Gymnastics/IMG1431/1213753305_dmyY6-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://doemasters.smugmug.com/RollTideBama/Misc/Alabama-Gymnastics/IMG1488/1213777046_rznTP-XL.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
*sigh*
Hardware Master (or something like that)
Avatar
25,131 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:30 |  #2

Most of the shots look pretty sharp outside of hands and feet and things like that.

The slower moving parts of the body are nice and crisp, it's the hands/feet and heads that are sometimes blurred and they will be moving substantially faster, so that is why they are blurred. Shoot with a faster shutter speed next time to entirely "freeze" the action.


-Nick | Gear | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:38 |  #3

You need to get your shutter speed up. I would up your ISO without hesitation, especially as you are using a 5DII.

When I shoot basketball I can't get away with less than 3200 ISO, the light is just horrible in most gyms.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bubbygator
I can't tell the difference
Avatar
1,477 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles
     
Mar 14, 2011 10:55 as a reply to  @ Familiaphoto's post |  #4

Yah, one click up on speed, and probably one click up on ISO.


Gear List
The avatar is my middle grandson. (the TF can't tell the difference, but the fish is frowning and the kid is grinning)
Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doemasters
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 301
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 11:19 |  #5

thanks, i will give that a try next time




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Mar 14, 2011 11:35 |  #6

I see the same hand/feet motion blur shooting basketball at 1/640. I guess to completely freeze all motion, you'd need something like 1/1000-1250. And it's really hard to see shutter speeds that high shooting indoors. Heck, I'd need ISO 32000 to see that at most HS gyms!

As someone else pointed out, you've got the important body parts (face, torso) in great focus with current settings. If it's imperative to stop motion in the hands and feet, by all means raise ISO until you reach 1/1000 or faster on the shutter.

dave

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rady
Member
82 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Mar 14, 2011 12:18 as a reply to  @ snyderman's post |  #7

the longer your lens is the faster shutter speed you need. to freeze the action with a 200mm i think 1/400 doesn't do the trick with this sport. but at 1/800 you shouldn't have any problems


SS (external link) - Blog (external link) - Pixelpost (external link)
1DMKIIN 17-40L LB2.0 85 70-200L 300L 430ex 285hv AB800 CyberSyncs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lacks_focus
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Coventry, CT
     
Mar 14, 2011 14:33 |  #8

rady wrote in post #12017670 (external link)
the longer your lens is the faster shutter speed you need. to freeze the action with a 200mm i think 1/400 doesn't do the trick with this sport. but at 1/800 you shouldn't have any problems

Not sure if you meant that somehow focal length and a shutter speed needed to freeze action were somehow tied, so excuse the following if that wasn’t your intent! Generally speaking, longer lenses require a faster shutter to prevent camera shake induced blur. The loose "rule" is 1/focal length (200 MM lens = shoot 1/200 or higher), some toss in a little fuzzy math to figure in the camera’s crop factor, but in truth, since it is not a hard fast rule it doesn't matter too much. The individual and the environment come in to play more than the rule. In comes the advent of IS to help here... A fast shutter is needed to freeze action, of course, but that depends entirely on the action and not your lenses focal length. If you need 1/800 to achieve the result you want, it would hold true whether you were shooting at 70 MM or 300 MM lens.

On the shots, they are great captures IMHO. I would say they should be a little brighter if anything, maybe by a full stop. You were in AV mode with -EC dialed in. Not sure if you meant to have the -EC dialed in, but it was there. If you want to completely freeze action, AV is not the mode to use! Use TV, or M to have positive control of the shutter speed would have been better. Just judging by the pics, I think I would have shot Manual, 1/800 – 1/1000 with an ISO of 6400.


1D MKIII | FujiFilm X10 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 | 135 f/2 | 85 f/1.8 | 580EX |
lacks-focus.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doemasters
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 301
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 15:00 |  #9

I will most likely try manual next time and see what happens, it was my first time trying and was not sure what to expect at all and plan on getting in me 70-200 IS lens next time after seeing a few people with those and think the stabilization may also help. I did move the EC because i thought some of the pictures did not look right




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lacks_focus
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Coventry, CT
     
Mar 14, 2011 15:09 |  #10

Doemasters wrote in post #12018718 (external link)
I will most likely try manual next time and see what happens, it was my first time trying and was not sure what to expect at all and plan on getting in me 70-200 IS lens next time after seeing a few people with those and think the stabilization may also help. I did move the EC because i thought some of the pictures did not look right

Well again, the IS will only help in removing camera shake induced blur caused by shooting at a shutter speed slower than the focal length the lens (1/FL). It will do absolutely nothing for you to stop subject motion blur. For IS, think electronic tripod. If you’re shooting with a shutter fast enough to freeze action of that (advanced) level of gymnastics, then all IS will do is eat batteries faster. Your 200 MM prime is a better choice unless you needed to go wider.


1D MKIII | FujiFilm X10 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 | 135 f/2 | 85 f/1.8 | 580EX |
lacks-focus.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fligi7
Senior Member
968 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 14, 2011 16:55 |  #11

I would say you have some pretty good shots already. A simple ISO increase and shutter speed bump next time and you'll be getting well frozen shots.

BTW, the IS version of the 70-200 is sought by sports photographers more for the image quality improvement rather than the actual help of the IS system since IS does nothing for fast sports shooting at shutter speeds 1/200 and above.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doemasters
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 301
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 14, 2011 17:21 as a reply to  @ Fligi7's post |  #12

Thanks again, I will keep practicing and use this advice




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,621 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Suggestions for blur on gymnastics pictures
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1220 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.