Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 16 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 08:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sunset after the storm...

 
MNUplander
Goldmember
2,534 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
     
Mar 16, 2011 08:15 |  #1

An early spring rainstorm rolled through the Duluth, MN area yesterday afternoon. It cleared up just in time to leave us with a beautiful sunset over Lake Superior.

The corners on images from my 10-22 seem to be very hit or miss - and in this case they missed, but I think I just need to pay more attention to them when Im focusing.

Let me know what you think - thanks!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography (external link)
Buy & Sell Feedback
R6, EF16-35 f4 IS, EF 50 1.2, EF 100 2.8 IS Macro, 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scm2000
Member
185 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Indy
     
Mar 16, 2011 09:07 |  #2

I really like it. Especially the detail in the rocks.


C&C Welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thetathink
Member
Avatar
194 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 10:17 |  #3

Nice sunset. Just out of curiosity, was this a composite of foreground and background? The foreground rocks look like there's a lot more light on them than would be available, judging by the background. Or maybe a light kit was used on the foreground?

The two larger rocks look cutout around the edges.
Overall something about it seems unnatural to my eye, but I do like the scene.


portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MNUplander
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,534 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
     
Mar 16, 2011 10:40 |  #4

thetathink wrote in post #12030940 (external link)
Nice sunset. Just out of curiosity, was this a composite of foreground and background? The foreground rocks look like there's a lot more light on them than would be available, judging by the background. Or maybe a light kit was used on the foreground?

The two larger rocks look cutout around the edges.
Overall something about it seems unnatural to my eye, but I do like the scene.

Yes, it was a composite - I exposed one image for the sky and one for the ground then did some layer masks. Cant wait for my GND's to get here, Im sooo sick of exposure blending...

I spent quite a bit of time working on blending them, but its more difficult than you would expect - at least it was for me. Ill go back around and do a bit more dodge/burn to give those cut-out looking edges a bit more depth.

As for the lighting, its probably more likely that I got carried away with underexposing the sky and water for drama than it is the light available in the foreground - there was plenty there. Maybe a bit of burning is order here too.

In any case, thanks for the comments - glad you liked it despite the shortcomings.


Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography (external link)
Buy & Sell Feedback
R6, EF16-35 f4 IS, EF 50 1.2, EF 100 2.8 IS Macro, 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natawijaya
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Abu Dhabi
     
Mar 16, 2011 10:43 |  #5

amazing scene... great shot....


http://natawijaya-photography.blogspot.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thetathink
Member
Avatar
194 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 11:06 |  #6

MNUplander wrote in post #12031069 (external link)
Yes, it was a composite - I exposed one image for the sky and one for the ground then did some layer masks. Cant wait for my GND's to get here, Im sooo sick of exposure blending...

I spent quite a bit of time working on blending them, but its more difficult than you would expect - at least it was for me. Ill go back around and do a bit more dodge/burn to give those cut-out looking edges a bit more depth.

As for the lighting, its probably more likely that I got carried away with underexposing the sky and water for drama than it is the light available in the foreground - there was plenty there. Maybe a bit of burning is order here too.

In any case, thanks for the comments - glad you liked it despite the shortcomings.

I haven't gotten any graduated filters yet either, so I know your pain! :)

The main thing giving it away is the tiny black fringe you can see on the edge of the rocks. Perhaps cleaning that up and maybe adding some slight glow bending over the edge of the rocks will help.

I do some cg/live-action compositing for my day job, so I'm always looking at that sort of thing, I'm sure it's not that noticeable to anyone else.


portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,007 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 117
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Darlington,England
     
Mar 16, 2011 11:43 |  #7

Very nice!


5D | 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Oppo Smartphone
My photo blog:
http://inventedeye.blo​gspot.com/ (external link)
My Photography Page
https://www.facebook.c​om/LarryShonePhotograp​hy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrGreen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,252 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Mar 16, 2011 11:48 |  #8

thetathink wrote in post #12031265 (external link)
I do some cg/live-action compositing for my day job, so I'm always looking at that sort of thing, I'm sure it's not that noticeable to anyone else.

I do the same thing as you for a living, but trust me this is pretty noticeable to ANYONE. There's an extreme exposure difference between the rocks and sky which is what's giving it away that it's not natural.


My site: www.millionflame.com (external link)
Gear: 7D - Zeikos Grip, Rebel XTi/400D - Opteka Grip, EF 24-105mm f/4L, EF 100mm f/2.8L MACRO, EF 50mm f/1.8 (Nifty Fifty), EF-s 55-250mm (Nifty Two-Fifty), Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Σ 150-500mm (Bigmos), Σ 35mm f/1.4, Σ 85mm f/1.4, Feisol CT-3442 CF Tripod, Photo Clam PC-40NS Ball head, 580 EX II Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MNUplander
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,534 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
     
Mar 16, 2011 16:08 |  #9

MrGreen wrote in post #12031520 (external link)
I do the same thing as you for a living, but trust me this is pretty noticeable to ANYONE. There's an extreme exposure difference between the rocks and sky which is what's giving it away that it's not natural.

Yah, like the other poster mentioned - it almost looks like the rocks were lit with something.

I personally like the look this image has, but I think Ill do a re-edit tonight that is less extreme.

Thanks for the comments everyone!


Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography (external link)
Buy & Sell Feedback
R6, EF16-35 f4 IS, EF 50 1.2, EF 100 2.8 IS Macro, 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Doctorh
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jan 2010
Location: South East Texas
     
Mar 16, 2011 16:24 |  #10

nice


Canon R6, 2 Canon 5D Mk II; Sony A6000; 16-35 LF2.8; 24-70 F2.8 L; 24-105 F4 IS L; 70-200 F4 IS L; 28-135 F3.5; 50 F1.4; RF 24-105 F4 IS L, and 580 EX11

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bakedcookies
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Mar 16, 2011 16:58 |  #11

Nice PP work and shot man!!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arzuhl
Member
Avatar
132 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Brisbane Australia
     
Mar 17, 2011 01:34 as a reply to  @ bakedcookies's post |  #12

Sweet shot!


5d MkIII Gripped, 1D mk3, EF 24mm f1.4L , 24-105mm Lf4, EF 50mm f1.2L, EF 85mm f1.2 II L, EF 70-200L f2.8 IS II, 3 x 600EX-RT Flash, Manfrotto 190 CX PRO 3 tripod with 498RC2 Ball Head, Manfrotto 334B Automatic Monopod.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MNUplander
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,534 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Duluth, MN
     
Mar 17, 2011 08:40 |  #13

Thanks everyone!


Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography (external link)
Buy & Sell Feedback
R6, EF16-35 f4 IS, EF 50 1.2, EF 100 2.8 IS Macro, 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pophoto
Senior Member
580 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 19:26 |  #14

I absolutely love the shot. One thought as I am studying composition at the moment. At first glance my eye wanders all of the scene. Nothing seems to draw me to a focal point. My eye actually went to the sunset first and then I realized the lightened area in the rocks.

Regardless ... the shot is very nicely done.


Canon 5D Mark II - 24-105mm, 100mm macro, 70-200mm 2.8L
www.dancphotography.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,395 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Sunset after the storm...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
503 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.