Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 21:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why do you need to factor in sensor crop when using the 1/(focal length) handholding

 
edmyloo
Senior Member
861 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 21:53 |  #1

I just read in another thread to factor in sensor crop when using the 1/(focal length) hand holding rule. Why do you need to do that? I understand that whether you're using APS or full frame, (x)mm will ALWAYS be (x)mm. The camera just uses less of the projected image and that's where you get the crop. So, why would you need to factor in sensor crop when using that hand holding rule? If you were using a 5D MK II and were planning to crop it down to APS-C format, would you have to factor in the 1.6x there too?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:06 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Since the image on the Crop sensor is smaller then image on the FF sensor, when you print (or present on screen with the same, specified dimension) both of them at the same paper, the cropped image has to be enlarged more then FF image.
More enlargement shows more of the displacement caused by the camera shake.

When you crop down FF image and enlarge it to the same size as the uncropped image, results will be the same: cropped final picture will show more imperfections then the FF one.

Also, don't forget that 1/FL*CF is only the guide line: actual results depend on couple of other, non photographic factors.


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natums
Senior Member
739 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:11 |  #3

If you are only using crop sensor camera, then this really has no reference for you, but if you are comparing the field of view to a FF camera or 35mm camera, then you will use that 1.6x crop factor to assess how to create a similar FOV.


| Current Gear (external link) |
| Vimeo (external link) | The Daily Discipline (external link) | Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:21 |  #4

Simple, If the image is amplified (cropped) then your shake is also amplified. Always good to throw in a fudge factor anyways.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edmyloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
861 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:42 |  #5

So if you were to crop a full frame picture into a 1.6 crop format and enlarge it to the same size, you SHOULD take that into consideration when hand holding?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:46 |  #6

What does your own experience tell you about your own ability to handhold lenses? Go by that!


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:48 |  #7

edmyloo wrote in post #12035355 (external link)
So if you were to crop a full frame picture into a 1.6 crop format and enlarge it to the same size, you SHOULD take that into consideration when hand holding?

Or any other factor you care to use.

Do keep in mind that this is just a guide. How still each person can hold a camera/lens depends on many variables. Find out for yourself what works and what doesn't.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edmyloo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
861 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:51 |  #8

Haha, alright! I generally use the 1/(focal length) rule and don't factor in the 1.6 crop and it's been working for. Just wanted some clarification about something I read I guess.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arentol
Goldmember
1,305 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Seattle WA
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:07 |  #9

The 1/focal length rule is a suggestion. It is most useful for those starting out, but it is also useful to pros as well as a general reference point. It also saves you from having to memorize a ton of info for each lens you have....

For instance, I know that I can only use my lenses effectively at the inverse of the focal length - 1/3rd stop. So instead of memorizing (literally) the 15 different minimum shutter speeds I need to know for all my lenses, + the 15 others I need with my other camera, or about 30 total shutter speeds I can just memorize 3 things....

The rule, the crop factor for when using my 7d, and that after setting shutter speed to 1/focal length I can roll it one more click to the left.

I don't even have to remember IS if I don't want.... Just set my focal speed, then roll up to 6 clicks for my 50-500, or up to 9 clicks for my 70-200.


5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto​.com/ (external link)
*****Lenses For Sale (external link)*****

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arentol
Goldmember
1,305 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Seattle WA
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:12 |  #10

edmyloo wrote in post #12035409 (external link)
Haha, alright! I generally use the 1/(focal length) rule and don't factor in the 1.6 crop and it's been working for. Just wanted some clarification about something I read I guess.

Yeah, definitely use what works for you. A lot of people do that and are fine. 1.6 is only 2/3rds stop. I bet a LOT of people are steady enough to use 1/FL - 2/3rds stop on Full Frame after they have a little practice. So it makes sense that with a little practice a lot of people just use the unmodified rule on crop.


5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto​.com/ (external link)
*****Lenses For Sale (external link)*****

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AntonLargiader
Goldmember
Avatar
3,110 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 411
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Charlottesville, VA
     
Mar 17, 2011 06:07 |  #11

edmyloo wrote in post #12035023 (external link)
If you were using a 5D MK II and were planning to crop it down to APS-C format, would you have to factor in the 1.6x there too?

That's a really good point. That is the way the guideline would work; if you're cropping then you would be seeing the camera shake more so you would want to give yourself a bit of extra safety margin. But as stated, it's just a guide and you should see what works for you.


Image editing and C&C always OK
Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . TT1/TT5 . Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
2,118 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 09:28 |  #12

I find that when I factor in the conversion factor, I need a little less compensation than this for a shorter focal length. Thus, I can hold my 35f2 at 1/40 or 1/50. For the 85, I need at least 1/125, but it is much better to have 1/160. I need to brace myself if using the 85 at 1/100. Some people may have steadier hands.
IS helps and I don't hesitate to use 1/15 or 1/10 with a short zoom and IS.
Action matters. A speed of 1/400 may not be enough for the 85 when photographing runners. A higher shutter speed is better for this.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,608 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Why do you need to factor in sensor crop when using the 1/(focal length) handholding
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1394 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.