Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 16 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 22:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What type of modifier is used for these shots? Beautydish?

 
m.shalaby
Goldmember
3,443 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
     
Mar 16, 2011 22:24 |  #1

I like the punchy/contrasty lighting. I'm guessing its a beautydish, silver perhaps? - but wanted confirmation:

http://www.flickr.com …5/sizes/z/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

http://www.flickr.com …5/sizes/z/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

http://www.flickr.com …5/sizes/z/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)

also, any idea how to get the shadows so dark? i'm guessing underexposing the ambient a little?

I really like this type of lighting, I just have no idea how to even begin with it




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:15 |  #2

Thanks, I did use a beauty dish. I built it myself, but it's about 16" in diameter, and does have a silver interior (metallic silver spray paint). Using this beauty dish for half length shots gives the deeper shadows/higher contrast (from a faster light fall off), versus a 22" beauty dish that gives more even lighting. I got your message on flickr and will show you the beauty dish I modeled my design off of, they're pretty inexpensive...

There's not really any "ambient" in any of these images (without flash, they'd be about a dozen stops underexposed) -- it's all flash. Actually, in all three of these images, the setup was exactly the same: An Alien Bee B800 boomed on a manfrotto 420B stand, through a bare (ungridded, unsocked) beauty dish on the camera axis. I use pocketwizards to trigger them...

The color is such (in the one color photo) because I intentionally used a three stop ND filter that is pretty cheap and shifts colors. with the two black and white images (from the same shoot), it uses the same lighting setup and they were both unchanged from what I got out of the camera, but when I did the black and white conversion in photoshop, I dragged the blues down a little, which gives it a bit more contrast. I just realized this is a canon forum, so I hope I'm not overstepping my bounds (shot these with Nikon, but light is light to me, and I love my 7D too), just trying to be helpful.

:)

If you have any other questions, I'm happy to help!


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:23 |  #3

m.shalaby wrote in post #12035243 (external link)
also, any idea how to get the shadows so dark? i'm guessing underexposing the ambient a little?

On a nice sunny day, stand close to a wall and observe your shadow on it. Or if you have a flash use it bare and observe it shadow with any subject. Now try this with other diffusers.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:31 |  #4

Be careful about under exposure. Even with lots of light. Strong tone curve is also you friend for getting rich blacks contrasty looking mid-tones and well detailed highlights.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 16, 2011 23:34 |  #5

as far as these images in particular, it makes a difference that I was wearing a black sweatshirt, and the other image, wearing dark blue pants and dark boots, so the dynamic range of the jpeg does probably clip the blacks more than a raw/tif would...only using one light often is the most dramatic lighting though, without other lights for fill...

edit: using a beauty dish without a sock, especially when compared to a softbox or umbrella that diffuses light much more, will give you higher contrast...you won't get the light "wrap" that you'd get with an umbrella, because there is no diffusion material in front of the dish. Additionally, the beauty dish is only a 16" light source, versus the larger 40"+ umbrella or typical softbox.


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,443 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 07:22 |  #6

anlenke wrote in post #12035505 (external link)
Thanks, I did use a beauty dish. I built it myself, but it's about 16" in diameter, and does have a silver interior (metallic silver spray paint). Using this beauty dish for half length shots gives the deeper shadows/higher contrast (from a faster light fall off), versus a 22" beauty dish that gives more even lighting. I got your message on flickr and will show you the beauty dish I modeled my design off of, they're pretty inexpensive...

There's not really any "ambient" in any of these images (without flash, they'd be about a dozen stops underexposed) -- it's all flash. Actually, in all three of these images, the setup was exactly the same: An Alien Bee B800 boomed on a manfrotto 420B stand, through a bare (ungridded, unsocked) beauty dish on the camera axis. I use pocketwizards to trigger them...

The color is such (in the one color photo) because I intentionally used a three stop ND filter that is pretty cheap and shifts colors. with the two black and white images (from the same shoot), it uses the same lighting setup and they were both unchanged from what I got out of the camera, but when I did the black and white conversion in photoshop, I dragged the blues down a little, which gives it a bit more contrast. I just realized this is a canon forum, so I hope I'm not overstepping my bounds (shot these with Nikon, but light is light to me, and I love my 7D too), just trying to be helpful.

:)

If you have any other questions, I'm happy to help!

oh awsome, i didn't know you were on PONT! bro, i love your work.
I sent you a flickr e-mail asking as well... lol...

cool to know your here on PONT - now I'll bug the hell out of you for lighting advice! :) j/k, j/k

I'm not a big DIY guy.. i'd like to buy something pre-made, ya know. I have been looking at this 16" silver dish -
http://www.cheetahstan​d.com …d-Pro-16%22-Beauty/Detail (external link)

any thoughts on that? should do the trick, right? -also, is the 16" big enough to do full body shots? from your photo's it looks like its covering just about your full body.
and one other question about ambient - so you just shot these with your BD, but what was the ambient in the room? window light or just like table lamps, ect???

thanks for the help in advance!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 17, 2011 08:37 |  #7

Typical beauty dish you want to use real close. So most sizes are for face shots only unless you buy those really big ones that Peter uses. I have kacey dish and do use it for full length though. It is not perfect but it works for me. I am using two speedlites and I have seen that this configuration puts more light on a wide pattern to cover full body. Here are some samples.

IMAGE: http://www.bobbyzphotography.com/img/s3/v25/p9089183-5.jpg
IMAGE: http://www.bobbyzphotography.com/img/s3/v23/p108769473-4.jpg

Don't know how the pattern for cheetah or other 16" dishes with only 1 speedlite looks.

Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,443 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 09:59 |  #8

bobbyz wrote in post #12037077 (external link)
Typical beauty dish you want to use real close. So most sizes are for face shots only unless you buy those really big ones that Peter uses. I have kacey dish and do use it for full length though. It is not perfect but it works for me. I am using two speedlites and I have seen that this configuration puts more light on a wide pattern to cover full body. Here are some samples.

QUOTED IMAGE
QUOTED IMAGE

Don't know how the pattern for cheetah or other 16" dishes with only 1 speedlite looks.

not sure who Peter is, but the linked photo's are exactly what I'm looking to do, and he is pulling it off with a 16" BD.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 17, 2011 10:12 |  #9

m.shalaby wrote in post #12037436 (external link)
not sure who Peter is, but the linked photo's are exactly what I'm looking to do, and he is pulling it off with a 16" BD.

Look at the waist down on the linked pictures. There is couple of stops difference.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,443 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 10:35 |  #10

bobbyz wrote in post #12037502 (external link)
Look at the waist down on the linked pictures. There is couple of stops difference.

Ah, I gotcha... well I'm cool with that. Those are the exact types of shots I'm looking to do, and I really like the punchy look of the silver dish....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 17, 2011 11:16 as a reply to  @ m.shalaby's post |  #11

"oh awsome, i didn't know you were on PONT! bro, i love your work.
I sent you a flickr e-mail asking as well... lol..."


Haha, I wasn't a member until last night when I saw there were a bunch of links pointed to my photographs, and I thought, since you were asking, that it'd be helpful if I chimed in...I didn't even realize it was a canon forum until after I posted lol.

"cool to know your here on PONT - now I'll bug the hell out of you for lighting advice! j/k, j/k"
I'm happy to share what I know, no problems there...

"I'm not a big DIY guy.. i'd like to buy something pre-made, ya know. I have been looking at this 16" silver dish -
http://www.cheetahstan​d.com/servlet/...-Beauty/Detail (external link). any thoughts on that? should do the trick, right?"


I'm not a DIY guy anymore either, but college forces you to stretch the dollar ;)
Would you be using this beauty dish with a strobe or a speedlight? There could be a pretty significant difference here...With my strobes, the flash bulb sticks out into the beauty dish, which allows it to spread the light much more evenly. The diagram in the picture for that beauty dish makes it look like the speedlight is recessed more, which would probably eat a lot of light because it'd be firing right into the central circle. The circle is designed to spread the light around the surface of the dish, but you might get a light that is smaller than you think, with faster fall off and not much power.

"-also, is the 16" big enough to do full body shots? from your photo's it looks like its covering just about your full body."
It will cover your full body, but there will definitely be a difference of about 2 stops or more, depending on how close the beauty dish is to the subject. I'm about 6'4'', so I probably have a little bit more of a difference than most people you'd shoot too, and the dark pants/shoes make for a more dramatic difference in fall off as well, as I've mentioned.

"and one other question about ambient - so you just shot these with your BD, but what was the ambient in the room? window light or just like table lamps, ect"

I shot all of these at night, with the ceiling bulbs (dimmed all the way down) in an 18' ceiling...It would have probably taken something like ISO 1000 at f/7.1, to use a handholdable shutter speed. I had my camera on a tripod, but was using ISO 200 at f/7.1 and 1/200th of a second, so there wasn't going to be any ambient in the shot...I even test it before I shoot, turning off the strobe, and taking a photo...pure black.

"thanks for the help in advance!"

Welcome! :)


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.shalaby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,443 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
     
Mar 17, 2011 12:31 |  #12

anlenke wrote in post #12037883 (external link)
"oh awsome, i didn't know you were on PONT! bro, i love your work.
I sent you a flickr e-mail asking as well... lol..."


Haha, I wasn't a member until last night when I saw there were a bunch of links pointed to my photographs, and I thought, since you were asking, that it'd be helpful if I chimed in...I didn't even realize it was a canon forum until after I posted lol.

"cool to know your here on PONT - now I'll bug the hell out of you for lighting advice! j/k, j/k"
I'm happy to share what I know, no problems there...

"I'm not a big DIY guy.. i'd like to buy something pre-made, ya know. I have been looking at this 16" silver dish -
http://www.cheetahstan​d.com/servlet/...-Beauty/Detail (external link). any thoughts on that? should do the trick, right?"


I'm not a DIY guy anymore either, but college forces you to stretch the dollar ;)
Would you be using this beauty dish with a strobe or a speedlight? There could be a pretty significant difference here...With my strobes, the flash bulb sticks out into the beauty dish, which allows it to spread the light much more evenly. The diagram in the picture for that beauty dish makes it look like the speedlight is recessed more, which would probably eat a lot of light because it'd be firing right into the central circle. The circle is designed to spread the light around the surface of the dish, but you might get a light that is smaller than you think, with faster fall off and not much power.

"-also, is the 16" big enough to do full body shots? from your photo's it looks like its covering just about your full body."
It will cover your full body, but there will definitely be a difference of about 2 stops or more, depending on how close the beauty dish is to the subject. I'm about 6'4'', so I probably have a little bit more of a difference than most people you'd shoot too, and the dark pants/shoes make for a more dramatic difference in fall off as well, as I've mentioned.

"and one other question about ambient - so you just shot these with your BD, but what was the ambient in the room? window light or just like table lamps, ect"

I shot all of these at night, with the ceiling bulbs (dimmed all the way down) in an 18' ceiling...It would have probably taken something like ISO 1000 at f/7.1, to use a handholdable shutter speed. I had my camera on a tripod, but was using ISO 200 at f/7.1 and 1/200th of a second, so there wasn't going to be any ambient in the shot...I even test it before I shoot, turning off the strobe, and taking a photo...pure black.

"thanks for the help in advance!"

Welcome! :)

Thanks for the responses. Yes, this would be speedlight usage. I have this bracket:
http://www.cheetahstan​d.com …-Speed-Pro-Bracket/Detail (external link)
which allows me to control how deep into or out of the BD I put the speedlight

The BD also allows me to set the center circle depth... so with control of both the center circle, and control over how deep I put the speed light, what would you recommend for max light output?

EDIT: - Also, I’m not certain exactly how to set the speedlight’s manual FL (50mm, 80mm, 105mm) ect… ? What would I set it to?

I would imagine I would NOT want a very wide spread like a 24mm setting that I use for a softbox, right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 17, 2011 12:58 as a reply to  @ m.shalaby's post |  #13

Well, I'd nose it in just slightly past the entrance of the dish's back, and leave the zoom probably pretty wide, with my dish that seems to give me the most even spread, but each dish is different. It's great yours is adjustable, I'd spend 30 minutes trying different configurations (even without a person, you could simply use a wall) and see which results you like best!


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Mar 17, 2011 13:10 |  #14

Anyone else laugh when they saw this guy (who took the photos) reply? Pretty awesome. Welcome to POTN! You seem like you'll blend in just fine :)


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brendo666
Goldmember
Avatar
1,538 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Renton, WA
     
Mar 17, 2011 13:19 |  #15

Aressem wrote in post #12038611 (external link)
Anyone else laugh when they saw this guy (who took the photos) reply? Pretty awesome. Welcome to POTN! You seem like you'll blend in just fine :)

not going to lie, i did. and this thread is helping me also! thanks guys, i will continue to sit back and read.


-Brendan B.
Graphic Designer | Photographer
5D III | 5D III | Σ 35 1.4 Art | 35 1.4L | 85 1.8 | 100 2.8L | 135 2L
Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,883 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
What type of modifier is used for these shots? Beautydish?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2839 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.