This is the first time I have taken a formal portrait...
csondagar Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 17, 2011 17:59 | #1 PermanentlyThis is the first time I have taken a formal portrait...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 17, 2011 18:47 | #2 The background looks good with the light around her to get separation but the light on her looks too flat to me. Did you use the pop up flash to light her? Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ootsk Goldmember 1,154 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2002 More info | Mar 17, 2011 18:51 | #3 You certainly got some things right with this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kuraz Senior Member 624 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Louisiana More info | Mar 17, 2011 19:05 | #4 Hi there. Nice first attempt. I honestly can't see nothing really wrong with this photo. Do you have any in portrait orientation?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 17, 2011 21:28 | #5 PermanentlyJakAHearts wrote in post #12040422 The background looks good with the light around her to get separation but the light on her looks too flat to me. Did you use the pop up flash to light her? No. I used my 430EX off the camera - placed on my right side about 6ft away from the subject. I don't quite understand how to make light on her not look flat. Would appreciate some clarification/tips on this. Thanks. ootsk wrote in post #12040435 You certainly got some things right with this one. Great smile, I like the head tilt. Exposure looks fine. Things I'd do differently? I'd crop out the negative space behind her...if you want to use neg space, make it on the other side. I'd have her tilt the other direction, so her part is on top....it just allows the hair to flow a bit more natural looking. I'd also get higher, and shoot slightly down on her. First off, it's thinning for the neck, and it makes the eyes look a bit better when she's looking up. Flash looks to be on-camera. If that's all you've got, fine. Try to get it off, or better yet, use a window for light and ditch the flash. I'll try out your suggestions on her tilting on her right and shoot slight from top. I have a 430EX and 7D pop-up flash. I used 430EX off the camera. Thanks for the tips. kuraz wrote in post #12040511 Hi there. Nice first attempt. I honestly can't see nothing really wrong with this photo. Do you have any in portrait orientation? The above makes a good point about shooting slightly higher for her No. I donot have portrait shot. Will try it out next time. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 18, 2011 06:55 | #6 I think the lighting looks flat because the popup flash also added to the exposure of the picture. See the little catch light dead center in her pupil? Thats a good indicator that the popup flash lit her. Im pretty sure you can disable that so that only the preflash sets off the off camera 430. I dont have a 7D so I cant help you with that but hopefull someone will chime in here and if not, its in your manual. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbvdm Goldmember 1,081 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kenmore, NY More info | Mar 18, 2011 07:01 | #7 I don't think the exposure is correct. It looks slightly underexposed. One critique was the lighting was "flat". I agree with that. The exposure on both sides of the face look identical and there are no soft shadows to define the face. Ideally, you would want some soft shadows on one side of the face to create definition. Also, if the light was to your right, I'm a little confused about the catchlight in the center of her eye. Did you also use your pop up flash? Recommendation: Move the light further to her left and higher with possible reflector on her right to fill in dark shadows. Good start. Canon 5D MkII gripped, Canon 7D gripped, Canon 40D gripped, Canon XTI (IR) gripped, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 60 Macro 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS , Canon 24-105 4.0, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sekonic L-358, Canon Speedlite 580-EX II, (2)430-EX, Pocket Wizards, lots of other stuff that seems to keep growing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 18, 2011 10:47 | #8 PermanentlyJakAHearts wrote in post #12042864 I think the lighting looks flat because the popup flash also added to the exposure of the picture. See the little catch light dead center in her pupil? Thats a good indicator that the popup flash lit her. Im pretty sure you can disable that so that only the preflash sets off the off camera 430. I dont have a 7D so I cant help you with that but hopefull someone will chime in here and if not, its in your manual. Hope that helps.Thanks. I checked the exif info on my raw and it does not show whether both flashes fired or only one. Regardless, my popup flash may have fired. I will try it out without (7D manual shows how to set master/slave flash arrangements). Cheers!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 18, 2011 10:48 | #9 Permanentlybbvdm wrote in post #12042878 I don't think the exposure is correct. It looks slightly underexposed. One critique was the lighting was "flat". I agree with that. The exposure on both sides of the face look identical and there are no soft shadows to define the face. Ideally, you would want some soft shadows on one side of the face to create definition. Also, if the light was to your right, I'm a little confused about the catchlight in the center of her eye. Did you also use your pop up flash? Recommendation: Move the light further to her left and higher with possible reflector on her right to fill in dark shadows. Good start. Thanks for the recommendation. Will try it out and post new photo soon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 20, 2011 13:21 | #10 PermanentlySo, I attempted formal portraits again with suggestions made above. I have chosen two portraits that I think captures the suggestions (and ones I like). #2:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CBJammin103@gmail.com Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Wow, massively better! The only thing that catches my eye at first is that I'd like to see more DoF separation between her and the background... that is, a more blurred out background. You could probably hit it in post production at this point.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 21, 2011 23:04 | #12 PermanentlyCBJammin103@gmail.com wrote in post #12057488 Wow, massively better! The only thing that catches my eye at first is that I'd like to see more DoF separation between her and the background... that is, a more blurred out background. You could probably hit it in post production at this point. Great improvement there! ![]() Thanks. I blurred the background and have update the photos.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 26, 2011 14:12 | #13 PermanentlyI'd like to hear from JakAHearts, ootsk, kuraz, and bbvdm on what they think of the latest photos. I took your advice, and want to see if you think I've hit the mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ootsk Goldmember 1,154 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2002 More info | Mar 26, 2011 21:39 | #14 I took a shot at cropping it more towards a formal portrait style. I prefer an 8x10, either landscape or portrait.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
csondagar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 792 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Victoria, Canada More info | Mar 27, 2011 11:31 | #15 Permanentlyootsk wrote in post #12099733 I took a shot at cropping it more towards a formal portrait style. I prefer an 8x10, either landscape or portrait. I also tilted it as a "masculine" tilt. Look up the different types of tilt...but generally masculine can be done by either sex, but feminine can usually only be done by a female. I left the black line so you can see how much I tilted and cropped it. I would have shot this larger, and included more of her blouse, but I only had to work with what you gave me. Anyways, this is my view of how to improve this photo. I DO think it's a major improvement over your first one, so great job on that. Keep shooting! Ootsk, this crop and tilt is compelling. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2934 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||