was wondering if anyone is gonna be shooting the Super Moon that will be happening on 19 March 2011 this year?
jhayesphotography Senior Member 505 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: OKC More info | Mar 17, 2011 21:40 | #1 |
Mar 18, 2011 05:46 | #2 As I said in another post. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cincojoe Member 66 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Texas More info | Mar 18, 2011 09:46 | #3 ha ha...the media has to have something to get everyone excited about. Canon | Mac
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Mar 18, 2011 09:55 | #4 Wow... you have photos of the moon, from the f u t u r e? WOW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Claytoon Hatchling 1 post Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 18, 2011 10:40 | #5 Give the guy a break, A Newbie T2i 18-135 3.5 for now!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Mar 18, 2011 10:55 | #6 Hey, I'm making a special trip to shoot the moon tomorrow. I am pretty excited about it. It may not be much for shooting shooting only the moon, but if you want to use the moon compositionally in a scene, there hasn't been a better moon for this, in over 20 years.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2011 11:29 | #7 I'm curious. When is the best time to take a picture of a full moon? I live in the midwest and its seems that it's best to try and shoot it in the early morning hours before sunrise? Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2011 12:12 | #8 |
ToddLambert I don't like titles More info | Mar 18, 2011 12:16 | #9 LOL!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2011 12:24 | #10 Claytoon wrote in post #12043903 Give the guy a break, The average person in their lifetime may only get too see 800 to 900 full moons. Actually, I'd be surprised if the average person actually 'saw' even half that number. The city-dwellers I've spoken to about things like this very rarely know what the current pahse of the Moon is, nor do they care. Claytoon wrote in post #12043903 Due to a little understood optical effect called the moon illusion. The full moon can seem huge when rising behind distant objects on the horizon. Actually, the illusion is fairly well understood. One of the key points is that you don't need distant objects on the horizon to see the illusion. Even with a featureless horizon the Full Moon will still look a lot bigger when it's low in the sky. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
martyn_bannister Senior Member 568 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Mar 18, 2011 12:40 | #11 Buylongterm wrote in post #12044151 I'm curious. When is the best time to take a picture of a full moon? I live in the midwest and its seems that it's best to try and shoot it in the early morning hours before sunrise? IMHO, never
On the other hand, a new to three-quarter moon is IMHO much more interesting in and of itself.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2011 18:47 | #12 Pah! Call that a Supermoon? Bloody kids of today are so easily impressed, but I've just popped out to look at it and it's not a patch on 1993. Now that was a Supermoon. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkateSoft Senior Member 383 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Mar 18, 2011 23:09 | #13 hollis_f wrote in post #12046528 Pah! Call that a Supermoon? Bloody kids of today are so easily impressed, but I've just popped out to look at it and it's not a patch on 1993. Now that was a Supermoon. Trust me, kids my age (middle school) wouldn't give a damn if they heard anything like this... except for me who is too easily excited. If only my friends knew about my hobbies... Gear- 550d, KONICA Auto S2, Pentak ZX-50, 18-55, 55-250, YN-560
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Boutte Member 105 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Belle Chasse La. More info | Mar 20, 2011 15:25 | #14 i was taking pics last night when a guy told me the moon looks largest just before it sets. He's been seeing it the last few nights and says it appears huge.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Boutte Member 105 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Belle Chasse La. More info | Mar 20, 2011 15:31 | #15 hollis_f wrote in post #12044487 Actually, the illusion is fairly well understood. One of the key points is that you don't need distant objects on the horizon to see the illusion. Even with a featureless horizon the Full Moon will still look a lot bigger when it's low in the sky. It happens because our brains don't think the sky is a hemispherical bowl, but a flattened bowl. We know that stuff on the horizon is a long, long way away - we can see distant objects looking very small and we know it takes a long time to walk there. However, things directly overhead aren't very far away at all - birds above us in the sky are quite close compared to the horizon. So, when we see the Moon near the horizon our brains 'know' that it's a long way away. When it's above us it's not so far away. But in both situations it has the same apparent size, and two objects with the same apparent size but at different distances must have different actual sizes - the distant object must be larger. I don't buy it. I guess it would be easy enough to check though. Use a finger or a ruler. Hold the same distance from your eye at both positions (low on horizon and high in the sky.) and measure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1312 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||