Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 17 Mar 2011 (Thursday) 21:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Super Moon

 
jhayesphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
505 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: OKC
     
Mar 17, 2011 21:40 |  #1

was wondering if anyone is gonna be shooting the Super Moon that will be happening on 19 March 2011 this year?


Jason
Canon 5Dc gripped | Elan 7e | Mamiya RB67 w/ 90mm lens | Canon 135L | Canon 17-40mm f4L | Canon 50mm f1.8
FeedbackFlickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 18, 2011 05:46 |  #2

As I said in another post.

No point.

1) Full Moon is the worst time to try to take a photo (well, apart from New Moon).

2) It will look the same as other other New Moon. It will be about 0.6% closer than April's Full Moon (356580 vs 358798) km.

IMAGE: http://www.frankhollis.com/temp/Supermoon.jpg

Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cincojoe
Member
66 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Texas
     
Mar 18, 2011 09:46 |  #3

ha ha...the media has to have something to get everyone excited about.


Canon | Mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Mar 18, 2011 09:55 |  #4

Wow... you have photos of the moon, from the f u t u r e? WOW ;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Claytoon
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 18, 2011 10:40 |  #5

Give the guy a break,
The average person in their lifetime may only get too see 800 to 900 full moons.

Due to a little understood optical effect called the moon illusion. The full moon can seem huge when rising behind distant objects on the horizon.
A super moon could appear especially impressive.

So, Jason shoot a way and hang them where you can enjoy them everyday


A Newbie T2i 18-135 3.5 for now!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Mar 18, 2011 10:55 |  #6

Hey, I'm making a special trip to shoot the moon tomorrow. I am pretty excited about it. It may not be much for shooting shooting only the moon, but if you want to use the moon compositionally in a scene, there hasn't been a better moon for this, in over 20 years.

That's the way I look at it. ;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Buylongterm
Goldmember
Avatar
2,084 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 69
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chi-town
     
Mar 18, 2011 11:29 |  #7

I'm curious. When is the best time to take a picture of a full moon? I live in the midwest and its seems that it's best to try and shoot it in the early morning hours before sunrise?


Christian
flickr (external link)
@WerthLiving (Follow me on Instagram)
Canon EOS 5D MK III Gripped | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS MK II |100mm f/2.8L Macro | 24mm-105mm f/4.0L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 18, 2011 12:12 |  #8

Todd Lambert wrote in post #12043633 (external link)
Wow... you have photos of the moon, from the f u t u r e? WOW ;-)a

You should see the ones from after the minor mishap in 2036!


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Mar 18, 2011 12:16 |  #9

LOL! 8-) I suppose you picked up a 1DsMk6 too!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 18, 2011 12:24 |  #10

Claytoon wrote in post #12043903 (external link)
Give the guy a break,
The average person in their lifetime may only get too see 800 to 900 full moons.

Actually, I'd be surprised if the average person actually 'saw' even half that number. The city-dwellers I've spoken to about things like this very rarely know what the current pahse of the Moon is, nor do they care.

Claytoon wrote in post #12043903 (external link)
Due to a little understood optical effect called the moon illusion. The full moon can seem huge when rising behind distant objects on the horizon.

Actually, the illusion is fairly well understood. One of the key points is that you don't need distant objects on the horizon to see the illusion. Even with a featureless horizon the Full Moon will still look a lot bigger when it's low in the sky.

It happens because our brains don't think the sky is a hemispherical bowl, but a flattened bowl. We know that stuff on the horizon is a long, long way away - we can see distant objects looking very small and we know it takes a long time to walk there. However, things directly overhead aren't very far away at all - birds above us in the sky are quite close compared to the horizon.

So, when we see the Moon near the horizon our brains 'know' that it's a long way away. When it's above us it's not so far away. But in both situations it has the same apparent size, and two objects with the same apparent size but at different distances must have different actual sizes - the distant object must be larger.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 18, 2011 12:40 |  #11

Buylongterm wrote in post #12044151 (external link)
I'm curious. When is the best time to take a picture of a full moon? I live in the midwest and its seems that it's best to try and shoot it in the early morning hours before sunrise?

IMHO, never :)

Getting a decent amount of contrast is difficult which results in it taking on the featureless appearance of the sun i.e. only interesting in relation to the foreground you shoot it with.

IF you can get it VERY low on a misty/dusty horizon at dawn or dusk then I take that back, because you might then be able to see some detail on it.

Or you can use its illumination.....

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


On the other hand, a new to three-quarter moon is IMHO much more interesting in and of itself.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 18, 2011 18:47 |  #12

Pah! Call that a Supermoon? Bloody kids of today are so easily impressed, but I've just popped out to look at it and it's not a patch on 1993. Now that was a Supermoon.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkateSoft
Senior Member
383 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Mar 18, 2011 23:09 |  #13

hollis_f wrote in post #12046528 (external link)
Pah! Call that a Supermoon? Bloody kids of today are so easily impressed, but I've just popped out to look at it and it's not a patch on 1993. Now that was a Supermoon.

Trust me, kids my age (middle school) wouldn't give a damn if they heard anything like this... except for me who is too easily excited. If only my friends knew about my hobbies...


Gear- 550d, KONICA Auto S2, Pentak ZX-50, 18-55, 55-250, YN-560
http://www.dylanredfie​ldphotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Boutte
Member
Avatar
105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Belle Chasse La.
     
Mar 20, 2011 15:25 |  #14

i was taking pics last night when a guy told me the moon looks largest just before it sets. He's been seeing it the last few nights and says it appears huge.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Boutte
Member
Avatar
105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Belle Chasse La.
     
Mar 20, 2011 15:31 |  #15

hollis_f wrote in post #12044487 (external link)
Actually, the illusion is fairly well understood. One of the key points is that you don't need distant objects on the horizon to see the illusion. Even with a featureless horizon the Full Moon will still look a lot bigger when it's low in the sky.

It happens because our brains don't think the sky is a hemispherical bowl, but a flattened bowl. We know that stuff on the horizon is a long, long way away - we can see distant objects looking very small and we know it takes a long time to walk there. However, things directly overhead aren't very far away at all - birds above us in the sky are quite close compared to the horizon.

So, when we see the Moon near the horizon our brains 'know' that it's a long way away. When it's above us it's not so far away. But in both situations it has the same apparent size, and two objects with the same apparent size but at different distances must have different actual sizes - the distant object must be larger.

I don't buy it. I guess it would be easy enough to check though. Use a finger or a ruler. Hold the same distance from your eye at both positions (low on horizon and high in the sky.) and measure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,793 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Super Moon
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1312 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.