Noise reduction: Lightroom vs NoiseNinja

NoiseNinja has been my go-to guy for noise reduction for a long time. I have Lightroom 2.3, but rarely use it. I've heard good things about LR 3.0 for noise reduction. I'm curious about the impressions of people who have used both Lightroom 3 and NoiseNinja for noise reduction. Do you see any advantage of Lightroom?

For perfection noiseninja is better, i used to use noiseninja but now i just use lightroom 3 because its less hassle using a plugin and faster.. integrates into the raw workflow alot more easier and faster.

k.CHU wrote in post #12047190
For perfection noiseninja is better, i used to use noiseninja but now i just use lightroom 3 because its less hassle using a plugin and faster.. integrates into the raw workflow alot more easier and faster.

Ditto me.

tzalman wrote in post #12048823
Ditto me.

Me three.

I rely on LR 3 when it is sufficient and Noise Ninja otherwise. I don't use NN as much anymore because of the improvements to LR, but I like having it handy.

I use bibble pro which comes with NN built in!

LR3!

LR3. Whether it is one or a thousand pics. click - boom-done.

I, too, put in a solid vote for LR3.
Its very efficient now.