Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Mar 2011 (Monday) 09:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

As far as image quality goes, which would be better...

 
nitrox28
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Mar 21, 2011 09:18 |  #1

The 28-135mm or the 18-135mm lens? I've owned the 28-135 before and loved it, but had to sell everything when I lost my job last year. Now I'm back in the saddle and just bought a 60D body and I need a good all purpose/walk around lens and the two I mentioned are in my budget. Any thoughts?


Kodak disposable, Ansco 35mm disk, Polaroid my parents gave me. That's about all I need really.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fernando
Goldmember
Avatar
1,628 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
     
Mar 21, 2011 09:22 |  #2

Even though the 28-135 gets more than its share of negativity on POTN I always liked mine. Nice range for what I shot and decent IS.

I've only gave it up for a faster lens (Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 ) since it was my only lens at the time.


Fuji convert - Ping me if you have any Fuji gear or legacy glass you're moving.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 21, 2011 09:35 |  #3

With that budget, a tamron 17-50 would be a better choice IQ wise.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3075
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Mar 21, 2011 11:35 |  #4

I dunno but if you were considering the 18-135 you shoulda gotten the 60D kit with it as i believe it would have saved you some $$

Between the two, Neither, get an 18-55 and 55-250, More range, Roughly the same price


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 21, 2011 11:47 |  #5

KenjiS wrote in post #12062537 (external link)
Between the two, Neither, get an 18-55 and 55-250, More range, Roughly the same price

yes, if image quality is important the 18-55IS and 55-250IS combination would be a better choice over the 28-135 -
www.photozone.de (external link)
or
http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=2​&APIComp=2 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HughR
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Mar 21, 2011 14:08 |  #6

The EF-S 15-85mm IS lens is outstanding, and that is the major lens I use on my 60D. It is a bit more expensive, however.


Hugh
Canon 60D, Original Digital Rebel (2003)
EFS 15-85mm IS USM, EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tokina 11-16mm
Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 430EX II,
Qbox 16 pro, Lastolite EZbox 24x24, Lumiquest Softbox III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nitrox28
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Mar 22, 2011 07:25 |  #7

Thanks everyone


Kodak disposable, Ansco 35mm disk, Polaroid my parents gave me. That's about all I need really.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Mar 22, 2011 07:31 |  #8

You could buy the 18-135 now and sell it later if you are ready for upgrade. Although like Hugh said, 15-85 is nicer if you could afford it. But I voted for 18-135 instead of 28-135, because 28 at APSC body may not be wide enough.


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 22, 2011 07:31 |  #9

Another vote for the Tamron 17-50 F/2.8.


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nepali
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Mar 22, 2011 10:12 |  #10

nitrox28 wrote in post #12061695 (external link)
The 28-135mm or the 18-135mm lens? I've owned the 28-135 before and loved it, but had to sell everything when I lost my job last year. Now I'm back in the saddle and just bought a 60D body and I need a good all purpose/walk around lens and the two I mentioned are in my budget. Any thoughts?

Check out these comparisons between 28-135 and 18-135:

@50mm f/5.6: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=3​&APIComp=2 (external link)

@85mm f/5.6: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=4​&APIComp=1 (external link)

@135mm f/5.6: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=5​&APIComp=1 (external link)

I would suggest you add about $100 more to your budget and buy a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8.



[Current Gears: Fuji X-T4, Fuji 35 f/2, GoPro HERO8, YN-560 III]
[Feedbacks: #1, #2]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,647 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
As far as image quality goes, which would be better...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
908 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.