I've decided 2011 will be the year I take a step up from my trusty old 100-400L and get a better lens with more reach. Of course I'd love a 500, 600 or 800L but that isn't going to happen to someone with my stricken finances.
It's going to boil down to a secondhand Canon 300 f2.8L IS (MK1) or a new Sigma 500 f4.5 EX. They'd be about the same price if I factor in buying a 2X T/C for the Canon, I already have a Kenko 1.4X. If the new 300 MK2 comes down in price that may be a contender as may the Sigma 120-300 OS if the latter gets good reviews. Either way it is still essentially the same predicament, a 300 f2.8 with t/cs or a bare 500 f4.5.
Does anyone have birding experience with these 2 lenses? I'm especially interested in how the Canon with a 2X T/C fares against the Sigma both in terms of IQ and AF speed. Obviously the Canon has other advantages, it is more handholdable and will be fantastic at 300 f2.8 and I imagine very very good at 420 f4.
Also how good is the Sigma wide open? From what I hear the Canon is razor sharp at all apertures but is this true with a 2X T/C?
One thing that worries me slightly about the Sigma is compatibility. I know some older Sigmas don't work on DSLRs (or can only be used wide open), how likely is it that the Sigma would last more than my next couple of body upgrades?
Any opinions gratefully received especially from people with direct experience of one or ideally both of these lenses........
I have a 7D and I'll be keeping my 100-400L which is very easy to unobtrusively pop in my toploading pouch when I potter around the local parks and forests. The big lens I'll be buying will be for more 'serious' stuff........
...but still what are the second hand rates in japan for the 500L...is it close to the sigma new price?
Might work, might not...taped pins or not.
