Magic3rds wrote in post #12085844
Wow, thanks for the quick replies
Ok yes, making it a little more life like and not a washout. I'm still trying to understand all this different ways and things in Photoshop
I had the camera on TV setting with the shutter at around 1/5, would it have been better to shoot in Manual to be able to select a different exposure?
One thing I always try to do, especially in manual is to take a test shot before hand. Especially if a train is coming since its not a static object so once it passes you its gone and your waiting again awhile before the next one
Its not film so click away. To get a starting point you can always meter the scene in TV for 1/5 SS and see what kind of aperture it spits out. Remember that number and when you go into manual, put that in for your aperture and take a test shot, see what the exposure is like and then you can wait till the train comes and unless the sun goes behind a cloud it should still be the same. This allows you to keep the same exposure instead of having it on TV and just as the train is passing the camera might meter off something dark/light and suddenly change the setting.
It was hand held, I thought about that afterwards that maybe it would haven been better resting on the bridge, but I was unsure about when the train passed under that it would have affected the shot because of the sligh bridge movement
That is a good point you make about the rumbling, didn't think about that until you mentioned it. You are correct in that the railing or ground will most likely rumble as the train zips by
Would also shooting this sort of shot in RAW been better, like butugly had mentioned in an earlier thread?
I generally always shoot RAW as it allows a lot more control and correction of your image after its been taken. In this case shooting in RAW would allow you do bring a bit more detail out of the highlights before they were blown out. It is a personal choice as lots of people don't enjoy the extra processing time.
Thanks I shot the idea I was looking for and with it being just down the road I can try again. The crop isnt the best I had to get it down from about 7mb to be able to send. Would a better crop be to make sure the train is in the middle?
I think you did the best with what you could, I personally would increased the field of view so you can see more and have the train "pass" under you in the tunnel more. Hard to explain. But if your on a bridge and the lens you use is at its lowest focal length then there isn't much you can do about it. Since the tracks under you and in the tunnel are all a bending to the right and running off frame essentially there is not much you can do to improve it in that sense. Ideally in this shot the tracks should be bending to the left slowly instead of the right so the train is more framed and 'disappearing' instead of leaving to the right in my opinion. But in the real world we rarely get the 'perfect' setup.