cooooper!

and co...

Way overexposed in the windows/body panels. At the same time, the shadows are too dark, no detail. The angle does nothing for me, and neither does the background. I'd say try again. Check out the automotive strobist setup thread to figure out where to place the light so you don't get the blown out areas.

Agreed, lighting needs attention, poor set up. I'm OK with the angle though.

cheers for the feed back guys! was a lil intoxicated when i took this...

surprised no one has said anything about it being HDR :P

Probably because it's not HDR, bland and desaturated is a closer description.

HDR stands for High Dynamic Range

You take 3 shots, one over exposed, one under and one correct, merge them together and so on n so fourth....

perhaps ud like to see al 3 pictures Mick Emmet? Thanks for your constructive criticism.....

Take my critique as you like, my opinion still stands. HDR it's not, there's more to it than just sticking 3 shots together. Perhaps you should post all 3 so I could have a look at them.

Road_Rebel wrote in post #12093282
HDR stands for High Dynamic Range

You take 3 shots, one over exposed, one under and one correct, merge them together and so on n so fourth....

perhaps ud like to see al 3 pictures Mick Emmet? Thanks for your constructive criticism.....

High Dynamic Range means there is detail in the extremely bright, and the extremely dark. The multiple-shot stitching is one technique to achieve this. Your picture, on the other hand is the exact opposite of HDR -- no detail in the bright, no detail in the dark.