Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 26 Mar 2011 (Saturday) 10:54
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Black & White or Color"
Color
4
57.1%
Black & White
3
42.9%
Both
0
0%

7 voters, 7 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Water Stream: BW or Color?

 
learncanon
Member
177 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 26, 2011 10:54 |  #1

1st of all, i apologize as these are not top-notch photos compared to e others.

Below are 2 photos PPed into BnW and Color. I can't really pick which is my favorite as they work well in both BnW and Color to me. The color version looks vivid and is easily like by most people. Whereas the BnW really shows the texture of the water (i didnt use super long shutter speed on purpose) and the rocks. BnW gives intense mood too.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Which one works well for you?
CC on composition, PP and etc... are welcome:)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2011 11:15 |  #2

Sorry, but neither works for me. The blacks look very clipped resulting in the shadows being obliterated. Also, I know you stated you did it on purpose, but it would be great if you could reshoot using a much slower shutter-speed to get a creamier look to the water.

Without seeing more of the surroundings it's hard for me to comment on the crop. Since you only show a tiny bit of the creek bank I'd be tempted to crop most of it out, even if the result is more "pano like".

I hope the above helps.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LamontSanders
Senior Member
894 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: PA USA
     
Mar 26, 2011 11:29 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #3

Color, but both look to be overdone. the B&W is really overprocessed...pull it back a little.


5DS R | 1Ds Mark III | Canon 16-35mm F/4L IS | Canon 24-70mm F/4L IS | Canon 70-200mm F/4L | Canon 50mm F/1.8 STM | Sigma 24-35mm F/2.0 Art | Samyang 14mm F/2.8 |
flickr (external link) | Old flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
learncanon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
177 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 26, 2011 11:30 |  #4

Bob_A wrote in post #12096733 (external link)
Sorry, but neither works for me. The blacks look very clipped resulting in the shadows being obliterated. Also, I know you stated you did it on purpose, but it would be great if you could reshoot using a much slower shutter-speed to get a creamier look to the water.

Without seeing more of the surroundings it's hard for me to comment on the crop. Since you only show a tiny bit of the creek bank I'd be tempted to crop most of it out, even if the result is more "pano like".

I hope the above helps.

Hey thank you.
I did a quick revision on the BnW. Hope its better. Im also confused as Ive seen photographers take advantage of clipping to lose all the details,show a small portion of their photo and make audience focus on the composition/subject. Seem like its more suitable for street?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Mar 26, 2011 15:54 as a reply to  @ learncanon's post |  #5

I'd reshoot, and use a polarizer to kill the glare on the rocks.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2011 16:01 |  #6

learncanon wrote in post #12096813 (external link)
Hey thank you.
I did a quick revision on the BnW. Hope its better. Im also confused as Ive seen photographers take advantage of clipping to lose all the details,show a small portion of their photo and make audience focus on the composition/subject. Seem like its more suitable for street?

The B&W looks better, but IMO the blacks are still too clipped for the color version. Personally I haven't been impressed with some of the attempts I've seen were photographers has purposefully moved the black point to obliterate shadows. I'm even seen wedding photographers do this and it's always awful, as you can't even see details in their subjects hair so it looks like everyone is wearing a black helmet. On occasion it works for street photography, in combination with a bit higher contrast or even some "grain" to get a grungier look. Pushing it too far still make for a horrible image though.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Mar 26, 2011 21:36 |  #7

The color version has bluish looking water.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 26, 2011 22:08 |  #8

HappySnapper90 wrote in post #12099712 (external link)
The color version has bluish looking water.

Agree, the WB needs some adjustment. If the image were taken in partial shade it would explain why it's too "cool".


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

892 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Water Stream: BW or Color?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1519 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.